Tag: LSM shills for the left

No bad news for the demcorats until after the election…

The sycophants in the media, in order to protect the democrats and this criminal administration in particular, are also holding off on a lot of information that would be detrimental to the collectivist powers that be. Picking a replacement for that criminal Eric Holder? Not until after the election. The Secret Service scandals? Not until after the election. The whole Ebola disaster that’s unwinding right now as the CDC crashes & burns and the powers that be pretend there is nothing wrong? Not until after the election. The fact that democrats want to give a pass to millions of illegal immigrants so they can drastically skew future elections in their favor as these people line up for their free shit? Not until after the elections. The list of things the DNC controlled media doesn’t want to talk about until after the election is long and distinguished.

And if they are not doing this delaying of bad news, they are outright faking data (unemployment numbers, economic numbers, government scandals) to fool people into thinking things are getting better than they are. If they deign to report, they provide cover. When they can, they bury the story. This despicable behavior is not news to those of us that pay close attention to the incestuous relationship between the DNC shills in the LSM passing themselves off as objective reporters and their masters in the democratic party, and par for the course. For example, bad Obamacare rate news is also being withheld from the public to prevent a negative impact to democrats, whom passed this disastrous and idiotic law on a party line vote, at the polls.

Here in the US, where the LSM thinks its job is to filter news to favor democrats and hurt republicans, we have not heard a peep about the US military investigation of the deserter the Obama administration traded Gitmo detained master terrorists for, but lucky for us the Berghdal story is covered by others outside the country. The unannounced fact, something that seems very common with anything that has detrimental impact for democrats in the coming election, is the military completed that investigation last week. But here in the US that never made the news cycle. Obviously even this compromised and PC-centric military leadership couldn’t sanitize the story enough to cover the obvious conclusion that Berghdal was nothing but a deserter and an enemy sympathizer, and that the Obama administration traded people very likely to attack the US again, to bring one of their own back.

The key to my speculation is the revelation in the MailOnline article pointing out that this information is unlikely to be reported until after the November election.

Low information voters and cheaters win the elections for the left. No wonder the left balks at any talk of actually providing some accountability and verification.

With the left it is ALWAYS about political gain

The proof of this sort of despicable behavior by the progtrads ample, but I want to come back to the whole rigmarole where millions of tax payer dollars were wasted on an investigation that they knew the leaker practically from the start and that the motive they produced was false, just to put Scooter Libby in jail, and all, because the left had a boner for Boosh and his people back in the day. Vallerie Plame, a nobody, was outed by Armitage, a democrat, and the left suddenly got all patriotic and concerned about national security. Kind of like they get concerned about deficit spending, military action, abuse of power, the right of states, and a slew of other such things, but then, only when a republican is in the WH. Now we have another such incident where national security was violated – for reeal this time – but because the guy in the WH is their man, they can’t be bothered.

The White House is adopting enhanced security procedures during foreign trips after the name of a CIA official was accidentally leaked to the press during President Barack Obama’s visit to Afghanistan late last month. However, no one was disciplined or fired as a result of the leak.

Deputy White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest announced the results of an investigation into the incident conducted by White House Counsel Neil Eggleston ahead of a fundraiser attended by the president in Massachusetts Wednesday evening. Earnest said Eggleston briefed White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough on the results of the investigation Tuesday. The president was also informed of the investigation’s findings Tuesday. Eggleston made three recommendations to prevent similar security breaches from occurring in the future.

The leak occurred when the name of the CIA’s station chief in Kabul was including on a list of officials who participated in a military briefing with Obama during his Afghanistan visit that was subsequently emailed to thousands of reporters on the White House press pool list. Business Insider has withheld the name of the station chief, which has not been widely reported in spite of the leak.

Earnest described the leak of the CIA station chief’s name as “inadvertent.” He said no officials were disciplined or fired.

“What this review was focused on was determining the nature of the release – in this case, they determined that it was inadvertent – and putting in place some process improvements that would make sure that this didn’t happen again,” Earnest explained.

So progtards investigate themselves, and find no wrong doing! Yeah, sure. Also note that they say that it is not a crime this time because it was an accident. If I recall correctly, the investigation on Plame found practically immediately that Armitage had revealed her name, by accident, but dragged on for over a year after that, because the left wanted blood. I wouldn’t be surprised that this was accidentally done. We are talking about progtard government types after all, and these fools take the prize for thinking they know shit when they are nothing but morons with authority. The point is the double standards. Again, if it was not for double standards, the left wouldn’t have any. Remember that time you hear these leftards accuse someone other side of criminal behavior.

Obamacare will be worse than this…

As with everything about this administrations, people were rewarded for mismanagement while we had rampant abuse of power, I mean frightening abuses like this one, and of course, delays in care correctly pointed out as death panels.

The left is desperate to pretend that this is a preview of Obamacare. Yeah sure. That’s because the bureaucrats that will run Obamacare are not the same low rent, power hungry, delusions of grandeur having dirt bags that now run the VA and screw over vets. “I told you so” is very appropriate at this time, but the profit haters that think government should run healthcare won’t care as long as their envy of other people making money is satisfied. After all, profits are evil and healthcare is a right. These people will make excuses for the most horrible dysfunctional system possible as long as it allows them to avoid having to submit themselves to the laws of economics and human nature. Of course, their delusion can only be maintained for so long as countless fortresses of lefty belief are finding out these days when they run out of other people’s money to spend.

The best thing that can come from Obamacare is that we roll it back and learn for at least a few generations that collectivism is a disease best avoided.

More proof the left is a bunch of economic illiterates.

This past weekend Matt Drudge of the famous Drudge Report website started a firestorm that had all the usual credentialed LSM idiots thinking they had scored a huge hit against a man they have hated for being instrumental in showing the LSM’s hypocritical status as nothing but a DNC propaganda machine. The controversy started with a tweet from Drudge about having paid what he labeled a “Liberty tax” in the case of the Obamacare penalty.
The credentialed fucking economic illiterate douchebags of course immediately accused Drudge of telling a lie
, and went after him something fierce. One after another DNC propagandist stuck out their neck to call Drudge out on his “lie”, stating that people paying taxes right now are doing that for the year 2013, and thus, with Obamacare’s penal-tax only going into effect in 2014, there was no way Drudge could be telling the truth. They were having a ball, thinking themselves the superior intellects, but the facts speak differently.

See Drudge is a self-employed small business owner, and as such, is required by the IRS to file his estimated taxes quarterly, in lieu of employer withholdings:

Estimated tax is the method used to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes and income tax, because you do not have an employer withholding these taxes for you. Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals (PDF), is used to figure these taxes. Form 1040-ES contains a worksheet that is similar to Form 1040. You will need your prior year’s annual tax return in order to fill out Form 1040-ES.

So when Drudge filed these withholdings, he filed them for the first quarter of 2014, which means he is required to pay that Obamacare penalty tax if he didn’t purchase health insurance, as every American now is forced through, under penalty of law and with the full coercive power of the federal government to punish him or her otherwise, or risk retaliation from the tyrants running the country these days. Tyrants, I should remind you, that have shown they are quite willing to bend/ignore/abuse the law to get their political enemies, and Matt Drudge is one of the top dogs on the WH list of enemies, and make them pay for defying the will of the new Emperor.

The problem here was that the credentialed douchebags in the LSM are economic illiterate turds, more interested in protecting the emperor with no clothes on, than in getting the facts right, and they literally have no clue how the complex and idiotic tax system, especially related to Obamacare, really works. If anything, this shitstorm of stupid shows, yet again, that these idiots, like most leftards, don’t know how small businesses or self-employed people pay taxes. Why would anyone trust them when they just parrot bullshit from their masters in the DNC is something I never get.

This abortion of a bill, one that we were told had to be passed so we could find out what was in it, rammed through the donkey controlled political machine, on a purely partisan vote that required all sorts of sweetheart deals – deals that cost the US tax payers billions – to get enough votes for it to be passed, is an epic disaster. It is so toxic that the WH, in a craven display of disregard for the constitutional separation of powers, has willy-nilly made changes to its implementation, in order to avoid getting creamed at the polls in the coming election. Americans are going to be fucked over royally by this bill.

The only people making out are the few extreme cases that either had pre-existing conditions or had bad plans to begin with due to other such extraneous factors. It wouldn’t surprise me that the number of these people is less than 1 or 2% of the total population impacted. The rest of us will be hammered, and hammered hard, by this shit bill. And to top that insult to injury off, we will see drastic reductions in access and quality of coverage as well, as this thing plays out. But we are not allowed to say that, because the DNC’s propaganda arm will throw a shitfit and try its best to defend the indefensible. Fuck you communist scumbags and you power grabbing schemes and scams.

The ACA will make healthcare less more expensive and harder to get for practically all of us, but the left has no desire to let you know that. This was not about helping us, but about cementing their power over us. Don’t let them pretend otherwise. These credentialed elite have no clue how things work anyway in the real world, as you can clearly tell from therir reaction right now.

More battlespace preparations..

In an article, carried in Al Jazeera of all places, titled Jill Abramson talks to John Seigenthaler, we find one tid-bit of information pertinent to the recent conversation about the secretive nature of this WH – the one that claimed it would be the most transparent administration EVAH! back during the early campaign days – and the reason so many people are finally catching on that this den of thieves is up to no good. The bolded text is the question by Seiigebthaler, and the other text is Abramson’s, whom is not a conservative in any sense of the word, answer:

Let me move on to another topic in the Obama administration. How would you grade this administration, compared to others, when it comes to its relationship with the media?

Well, I would slightly like to interpret the question as “How secretive is this White House?” which I think is the most important question. I would say it is the most secretive White House that I have ever been involved in covering, and that includes — I spent 22 years of my career in Washington and covered presidents from President Reagan on up through now, and I was Washington bureau chief of the Times during George W. Bush’s first term.

I dealt directly with the Bush White House when they had concerns that stories we were about to run put the national security under threat. But, you know, they were not pursuing criminal leak investigations. The Obama administration has had seven criminal leak investigations. That is more than twice the number of any previous administration in our history. It’s on a scale never seen before. This is the most secretive White House that, at least as a journalist, I have ever dealt with.

There is a reason the that these people that promised to be the most transparent WH ever have been, and continue to be, so secretive, and it has zero to do with national security or anything positive. And before anyone starts saying this doesn’t reflect on Obama at all, let me post another part of that exchange that will make it very clear that Abramson at least admits the directive has to come from the top man:

And do you think this comes directly from the president?

I would think that it would have to. I don’t know that, but certainly enough attention has been focused on this issue that, if he departed from the policies of his government, I think we’d know that at this point.

So it makes it more difficult for The New York Times to do its job.

Absolutely.

You can, if you like me, have paid attention to and seen the production of what the NYT claims has amounted to them doing their job, have a hearty laugh at the last Q&A there, because the evidence clearly shows that the NYT’s effort has been to provide coveer for this WH, and Obama specifically, but even the NYT is admitting that Obama is the one that has created the directive to control the flow of information.

Looks, information is key. I am not surprised to see Obama and the left think they need to control it. It’s Stalin’s dictatorship rules of control 101.

Yes Abramson, in typical lib fashion then proceeds to pretend like the Boosh administration misled them and the media on Iraq, as if the same information and arguments made by Boosh’s people to them was also not what came from the Clinton administration, or for that matter every other intelligence organization on the planet, which shows her lib creds. It’s the typical need to throw the lib audience a bone after you point out how fucked up one of their heros is. The left remains obsessed with rewritting this chapter of history, and I suspect the reason theya re doubling down now is so Hilllary can claim her vote to go into Iraq was because she was lied to. That would give the rabbid leftoids an out come 2016.

The NYT gets a two-fer. They play hardball with Obama, pretending that they have actually been doing their job, and they get to set up a narrative that benefits the next donkey candidate, another criminal and liar, they are already hard at work shilling for. Par for the course for the NYT.

Progtard narrative misleading yet again

Let me start by saying that the death of a child is a terrible thing, but I just can’t stand the progtard’s deceptive use of tragedy to rob us of our freedoms, especially when statistics tell a different story than the one they want you to hear. From this stupid article:

About 500 American children and teenagers die in hospitals every year after sustaining gunshot wounds — a rate that climbed by nearly 60 percent in a decade, according to the first-ever accounting of such fatalities, released Sunday.

In addition, an estimated 7,500 kids are hospitalized annually after being wounded by gunfire, a figure that spiked by more than 80 percent from 1997 to 2009, according two Boston doctors presenting their findings at a conference of the American Academy of Pediatrics, held in Orlando, Fla.

Eight of every 10 firearm wounds were inflicted by handguns, according to hospital records reviewed by the doctors. They say the national conversation about guns should shift toward the danger posed by smaller weapons, not the recent fights over limiting the availability of military-style, semi-automatic rifles.

“Handguns account for the majority of childhood gunshot wounds and this number appears to be increasing over the last decade,” said Dr. Arin L. Madenci, a surgical resident at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital and one of the study’s two authors. “Furthermore, states with higher percentages of household firearm ownership also tended to have higher proportions of childhood gunshot wounds, especially those occurring in the home.”

Among homes with children, rates of gun possession ranged from 10 percent in New Jersey, for instance, to 62 percent in Montana, the researchers found.

Madenci, and his colleague, Dr. Christopher Weldon, a surgeon at Boston Children’s Hospital, tallied the new statistics by culling a national database of 36 million pediatric hospitalizations from 1997 to 2009, the most recent year for which figures are available.

During that period, hospitalizations of kids and teens aged 20 and younger from gunshot wounds jumped from 4,270 to 7,730. Firearm deaths of children logged by hospitals rose from 317 in 1997 to 503 in 2009, records showed.

Among those victims may have been 3-year-old Will McAnaul, who died on July 21, 2009 in Dayton, Ohio. The preschooler discovered his father’s loaded handgun under his parents’ bed and accidentally shot himself.

You get a whole bunch of numbers, numbers that are not adequately explained, and then they focus on one case: the tragic death of a 3 year old. Because that sob story is far more likely to appeal to their agenda than pointing out that most of those deaths and injuries happen to gangbangers under the age of 20. It is outright despicable that this author is that much of a scumbag.

Yeah, the death of this poor, young, child is a horrible tragedy, but this vile and deceptive story leaves you believing that this scenario is the norm, not the exception. Nothing could be further from the truth. The vast majority of the killed and hurt are gangbangers doing their thing. The story doesn’t even mention these facts. This piece masquerades as news, but it is nothing but propaganda, and despicable propaganda that uses the death of a child to push a vile agenda. These people are scum, I tell you.

LSM doing 2014 battlespace preparation

I suspect that we are going to be flooded with articles like this one about the racism in America that can only be kept at bay by electing democrats the closer the 2010 election gets to us. The whole made up Trayvon Martin and White Hispanic George Zimmerman thing sure served to get out the vote, so I expect the LSM to gin up as many of these as they can. Case in point this article:

FORT WORTH (CBSDFW.COM) – Fifth graders at a Fort Worth elementary school told their parents a teacher separated them by race, and then insulted them and their families. The Fort Worth Independent School district said in a statement it was aware of the allegations, and would take appropriate action after the facts are known.

Parents said the incident happened in a music class Friday at Hazel Harvey Peace Elementary school. Sandra Lee said it was the first thing her daughter told her about after school.

“He called the class stupid, and when he separated the black kids from the white kids, he told the black kids I know where y’all from,” Lee said her daughter told her. “He said I can tell neither one of y’all get punished at home.”

That highlighted section is mine, and done for a reason. There really were only 2 students that got separated from the rest of the class. At least these reporters acknowledge that in this blatant lefty narrative fluff piece. Yes, they happened to be black, but I think this had nothing to do with race and everything to do with behavior.

There is more that they omitted though. When you read this piece of shit article you are supposed to think that some racist honkey teacher did this because racism is rampant. From the idiotic people they interview to provide evidence that racism was the motivation, brainwashed leftist dolts for sure, you could be forgiven for that impression. Like good little drones these idiots are all ready to earn their street creds, even if they have to make up shit to do so, with the progtard movement. But they can be forgiven for being your usual brainwashed public school system drones. The people that wrote this despicable article however, should be tarred & feathered.

Read the comment section, and you find out a little detail that’s quite startling and obviously been purposefully omitted from the article: that racist teacher you are supposed to think is white turns out to be Latino. I guess that like George Zimmerman, this teacher must be one of those elusive “racist White Hispanics” that only members of the LSM seem to know about. It’s another case of “narrative uber alles!” with these fucking leftist scumbags, I tell you. This man’s life will is now ruined, all so the left can keep pushing the narrative. There is an election coming soon, and that trumps any damage the LSM must inflict to gin up the vote. In the meantime, what do you think is the lesson that these 2 disruptive kids learned, and how will that work out for them later in life, huh?

CONSENSUS! So it must be true.

It must be true because the members of propaganda arm of the DNC say it is so, and we all know that when the LSM says so, it is so:

The nation’s big three news networks are falling right into place for President Obama and the Democrats, blaming the Republican Party for the government shutdown by a whopping 21-0 story count.

According to a survey by the conservative media watchdog Media Research Center, in 39 stories during the two weeks leading up to the shutdown, CBS, ABC and NBC blamed the failure to cut a budget deal on the Republicans 21 times, both parties four times, and Democrats zero times. In 14 stories, nobody was to blame.

Yeah, OK, that’s got to be true then since these shills all agree on it. Then you get revelations like this one, which shows the blatant bias they pretend doesn’t exist.

Of course, I believe this whole shutdown thing is to keep people from finding out problems with Obamacare’s exchange implementation. Stuff like the hotline for this turd sandwich actually being 1-800-FUCKYO, something I am sure is purely coincidental and not by design, because we all know that they mean well. Of course, the alternative, that they are too stupid to figure out their hotline number is that, doesn’t speak well for them either, if this was just a coincidence.

The only people losing out, both when it relates to this shutdown and to Obamacare, are the productive and tax paying American people.

Some Obamacare updates..

When the LA Times has to call you out on a blatant lie, it must suck ass:

California’s health insurance exchange vastly overstated the number of online hits it received Tuesday during the rollout of Obamacare. State officials said the Covered California website got 645,000 hits during the first day of enrollment, far fewer than the 5 million it reported Tuesday. The state exchange had cited the 5 million figure as a sign of strong consumer interest and a major reason people had so much difficulty using its $313-million online enrollment system. Dana Howard, a spokesman for Covered California, said the error was the result of internal miscommunication.

I bet the miscommunication was that they forgot to tell the LA Times not to call them out on their incessant lying. The rest of the article is fluff, to spin the fact that this thing is a disaster in some positive light, and can be ignored. There is a prevalent trend here. Hold on and we will get to it.

As one can find out – in the foreign press, because here in the US the propaganda branch of the DNC is doing its best to spin the story in a positive way – things are looking bleak. Here are some details:

* EXCLUSIVE: Less than 1% of visitors are signing up for Obamacare on state health exchange websites
California’s program registered an estimated 0.58 per cent of website visitors in its first day

* A Connecticut congressman boasted that his state took 167 applications for Obamacare services on day one, a rate of 0.59 per cent

* Obama administration won’t say how many Americans signed up on the central website that covered insurance exchanges for 36 states

* Kentucky’s 5.3 per cent application rate seems to be the nation’s highest

* Other states wouldn’t provide statistics, or tracked only the creation of new online accounts, not numbers of completed applications

My personal favorite, and a quite telling piece of information, was this one:

But without enrollment figures, it’s impossible to know whether Obamacare is seeing a flood of new customers or just a trickle. The White House did not respond to a request for those numbers.

I am gonna bet that they are not holding this back because they think they can then silence the critics by showing some unbelievably high numbers and score a major win. The more likely scenario is that the shit stinks, and they are getting desperate. Maybe the government shutdown was done so the left could distract people from how bad this Obamacare thing really is? It also gives them cover to say shit like this and get away with it.

Don’t worry however. It looks like the donkeys have a solution to mitigate the problems. More free shit that isn’t free at all. And wait until they have all the information on you. That’s when things will get all jiggy.

Of course, anyone that points out what sort of disaster is coming our way is a racist, evil hack.

One of these is not the same…

There was that Sesame Street game when I was a wee lad in the days of the dinosaurs, where the protagonists always sang that song about one of the items not being the same or not belonging, and in this case of the recent Time Magazine release, I think the same applies.

One of these doesn't belong

One of these doesn’t belong

Heh….