Tag: Islam and antisemitism

Peace? We don’t need no stinking peace!

That peace deal with the “o so maligned” Palestinians? It’s a damned farce. As usual this isn’t peace, this is a lull on the storm so they can rearm, but the usual stupid stooges in the LSM are glad to pretend they mean it this time. See we already are seeing Hamas reminding the peace lovers what the end game really remains for them all. Check the video out:

In the mean time the helpful nations of the world are sending in emergency supplies to the poor Palestinians. This is happening while the other death cultists, the ones that are better at hiding what they are about, are hoping to join one of the most evil organizations on the planet. France sure is for it! Seriously, can we send the UN packing yet?

I am sure all this other nonsense will be drowned out anyway, as this other circus is starts up soon. I hope they finally come clean and admit the dude died of AIDs. I know! George W. Bush did it! Heh.

Some real perspective.

In Hal’s post titled Hamas and Israel, round 47, we got in a pretty heated discussion with the moralizers that seem to have a beef with Israel fighting back. At issue was the fact that the LSM immediately accused evil Israel of killing babies, while either using insane and twisted logic to justify their criticism or completely ignoring the fact that the Hamas worshipping death cultists in Gaza were lobbing hundreds of missiles daily at Israeli civilians. As those of us that knew better expected, it turned out that the indignation by the Jew haters in the west was based on damned and staged lies. Even when there are actual civilian casualties on the Palestinian side – according to the LSM there never are civilian casualties on the Israeli side, and certainly not innocent civilian casualties, because evil and powerful Israel is an occupier and a bully – those of us that are able to view this conflict without the bias coloring the view of your average enlightened leftist, know these people were purposefully put in harms way by their own leadership to score cheap points.

This conflict is neither complex nor difficult to comprehend: it is insane. On one side you have a bunch of tools that are being used by the Nazi influenced Arab world and have spent the last 7 decades being turned into death worshippers that refuse to back off their holy charter of driving all the Jews into the sea and exterminating Israel. On the other you have a nation that has offered everything short of its own extinction up to reach an insane and imposed compromise, only to be rebuffed, repeatedly, being held to impossible and ever changing standards. It is insane. Israel is expected to basically tie its hands behind its back and bare its throat to these monster that want to exterminate its people.

That so many in the west, under the pretense of just holding Israel to a high standard, as several of the pro-death worshippers posting in Hal’s comment section told us, demand Israel be perfect or do nothing is not a coincidence. It is a strategy; deprived of the ability to respond, one can only logically conclude that the agenda here is to handicap Israel until it falls. Before you try to argue otherwise, consider a revelation from this article about the Iron Dome missile defense system and what it really says:

Except, here’s a true story: Back in mid-June, during the great Paris weapons show, the Rafael pavilion was absolutely the busiest around, and everybody wanted to look at the new, exciting, Iron Dome system, the greatest achievement in rocket defense ever. But by the end of the show, Rafael hadn’t made a single sale. The Arrow sold well, other systems did great – Iron Dome wasn’t moving. So they contacted their big clients, the serious ones, and asked what gives. And those clients told them no one except Israel has any use for these things. Because in any normal, sane country, if some hooligans were to start targeting civilians with rockets – the army would go and kill them.

Emphasis mine. Yeah, sure, these people demanding Israel be perfect, or do nothing otherwise, really are doing it out of higher morality. Not because they want to prevent Israel from being able to defend itself or protect its citizens, with only one possible outcome following that line of thinking. Everyone knows that the bad people are the ones like me that do not want to accept the moral equivocation that pretends barbarians on a genocidal quest should be given a pass, while a civilized nation gets told to die a death by a thousand paper cuts, because the issue is “complex”. Right. Their demands Israel do the impossible is not about higher standards: it is about crippling Israel’s ability to defend itself. It is the same phenomenon that we saw when the left imposed impossible ROEs on US military forces in the hopes it would lead to a loss both in Iraq and Afghanistan when the WH was not occupied by a person with an (R) next to their name. These people do not give two shits about the victims they pretend to cry for. It is about fucking over the people they don’t like. No other country in this world would tolerate what Israel is being told to. The real moral question here is why this is so.

WTF can go wrong with this?

And by “This”, I mean the disclosure that U.S. officials have met members of the Muslim Brotherhood’s political party for whatever godforsaken reason. Lets take a look at this fluff piece:

(Reuters) – U.S. officials have met members of the Muslim Brotherhood’s political party, a U.S. diplomat said, after Washington announced it would have direct contacts with Egypt’s biggest Islamist group whose role has grown since U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak was ousted. Washington announced the plans in June, portraying such contacts as the continuation of an earlier policy. But analysts said it reflected a new approach to the way it dealt with a group which Mubarak banned from politics.

The Brotherhood is one of Egypt’s most popular and organized groups, with a broad grassroots network built up partly through social work even in Mubarak’s era. The contacts may unsettle Israel and its U.S. backers. The Brotherhood renounced violence as a means to achieve political change in Egypt years ago. But groups like Hamas, which have not disavowed violence, look to the Brotherhood as a spiritual guide.

Can they spin this shit even more? First off, the Muslim Brotherhood is a “political party” like Islam is a “religion”. In fact, the closest approximation for it that I can think off is the IRA, which pretended to have a political arm while a whole bunch of goons went about the business of killing. The difference between the IRA and the Brotherhood is that these clever bastards lie about their association with all the Islamic murderers doing the dirty work. So it rankles the bejeesus out of me to see the AP make like these guys are not so bad.

Fuck, the Brotherhood is popular because they still want to destroy Israel and believe firmly in the Caliphate! Westerners forget that in the muslim world anyone that says they will kill Jews and wipe Israel of the map wile promising that radicalized hard-line Islam will end the incessant corruption that is rampant, pervasive, and permeates every aspect of Islamic the society, not when they do it, but when everyone else does, is considered popular. The Khomeini’s new ultra-conservative Iran and Afghanistan’s Taliban were both incredibly popular, that is, until the people experienced their new hard-line radicalized Islamic government, and found out that the corruption and bad things all got worse, only the characters doing it changed. The Brotherhood will be the same. It’s almost sarcastic that the Brotherhood calls it’s political party “the Freedom and Justice party”.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked in an interview broadcast on Saturday with Egypt’s Al-Hayat television whether Washington would be ready to work with a future government that included members of the Brotherhood.

“We will be willing to and open to working with a government that has representatives who are committed to non-violence, who are committed to human rights, who are committed to the democracy that I think was hoped for in Tahrir Square,” she replied, according to a U.S. transcript.

Maybe they should actually commit violence against the US. The Pakistanis are doing just that and we keep paying them big money.

Like I said: what can go wrong with this, huh?