Tag: governmental abuses

Yeah, I am sure that’s what happened! (UPDATED)

It now looks like the IRS conveniently lost the Lerner emails that would prove the extent of the criminal activity going on there:

Washington, DC – Today, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) issued the following statement regarding the Internal Revenue Service informing the Committee that they have lost Lois Lerner emails from a period of January 2009 – April 2011. Due to a supposed computer crash, the agency only has Lerner emails to and from other IRS employees during this time frame. The IRS claims it cannot produce emails written only to or from Lerner and outside agencies or groups, such as the White House, Treasury, Department of Justice, FEC, or Democrat offices.

Man, that was a one convenient computer crash, huh? I am sure the usual defenders of the indefensible will demand we believe this is just another coincidence in a long, long string of similar coincidences, and then tell us to just let it go, because4 obviously there is no evidence so there is no case. The left is a crime syndicate, I tell you. They play for keeps. They think the law is their cudgel with which to beat the enemy down, and nothing more. These people are the robber barons of old on steroids.

Look, anyone that doesn’t at this point believe the Obama administration ordered the IRS to do this, then had the FBI and other US agencies actually work to target their political enemies is a fucking fool. This is the administration Nixon would have sold his soul to the devil to have been able to have. If you want to see corrupt: look towards the progressives.

UPATE: Over at Powerline they have a DOJ employee that confirmed the IRS computers back up every night, so this unlikely bullshit about not having the emails is bunk. As we predicted in the commentaries, the next one will be that the backup server had an issue, and then we will have the LSM telling us to just drop it already, because there is no evidence to support this faux scandal….

An idea I am behind..

The next big bubble that will burst, if the wholehousing market or government money printing & incessant borrowing leftist agenda, and forced anti-savings money policies, which the Europeans have adopted, doesn’t blow up on us yet again, will be the student loan bubble. There is another $1.2 trillion of tax payer liability, waiting to blow up as the economic policies of the nanny staters create even more unemployment for the people leaving college with massive debts. And when it goes, you can bet that it will be those of us that bailed the government, their friends and donors in the “Too big to fail” industries, and are now paying for the democrats to buy enough votes to give them more than even odds at retaining power and causing more misery for us all, that will foot the bill for that too.

So you can see why I live the idea of having colleges be partially responsible for giving out student loans. It would both act as a deterrent on the faster-than-inflation rise in higher education costs, and the idiotic admission policies that have turned everything but the hard science and engineering schools of practically all universities and colleges into indoctrination camps for the lefts idiotic ideas. That’s probably why nobody on the left would ever want to put a policy like this in place either, but it would definitely address the problems affecting the higher education establishment, and our country as a whole, all at once.

If a college or university lets an under qualified high risk of failure applicant in, usually over better qualified ones, and they fail, then having to pony up lets say 60% of what that student owes will act as the best deterrent against these stupid policies. Similarly, letting students attend college for a fortune to learn skills that will not qualify them to do anything but flip burgers, will wipe out all these fringe and useless degrees people pay an arm and a leg for, usually so they can party hard for however many years it takes to get a degree these years. I am sure the fluff schools, where most of the leftist indoctrination and monolithic thinking goes on these days, wouldn’t want something like this, ever. It would be the end of their goose that laid the golden egg era.

So, yeah none of the academic institutions now profiting of the incestuous relationships between the government mandated loans and their institutions, and even the leftists in government, would suffer from such a move, but the students and the tax payers that foot the bills when the students default, currently screwed over by these institutions and their buddies in government that like the deal because they get a lot of leftist indoctrinated drones that will vote for them, sure would.

Maybe that’s precisely why we will not get it ever. Right now the progtards are getting the best of all worlds in this exchange. The left has too much to lose, and they love doing things that make them rich and powerful, as long as they don’t have to foot the bill themselves.

Obama’s new America

Can you imagine the treatment from the media and the left if a republican administration had their State Department state that Prosecutions of journalists who refuse to disclose their sources for national security-related stories do not qualify as harassment? Well, Obama’s State Department just made that case, and the LSM is mum.

“Individuals are required to testify in court cases all the time,” Jen Psaki said during Monday’s press briefing. “There is an enormous difference between when we’re talking about an individual revealing classified information and what we’re seeing happening around the world.”

The exchange was a follow-up from Friday, when Psaki celebrated World Press Freedom Day. “We will highlight emblematic cases of imperiled reporters and media outlets that have been targeted, oppressed, imprisoned or otherwise harassed because of their professional work,” she said of the coming State Department initiative.

When Psaki was asked about the case of New York Times reporter James Risen “who was ordered in July to testify in the trial of a former Central Intelligence Agency official accused of leaking information to him,” Psaki replied Risen was not charged “for simply exercising [his] ability to tell a story.”

The part that is frightening is that the Obama administration has repeatedly singled out and harassed reporters that pissed them off, often just because said reporters inferred or talked about all the abuses and illegal shit the various entities in the Obama administration are doing, by having the Obama administration’s prosecutorial arm claim national security violations require them to find out who divulged their misbehavior, and then all so they could exact vengeance on any and all whistle blowers.

No administration has been more hostile to freedom of information and abusive to the press, resorting to an incredible level of secrecy to hid their massive abuses and illegal activity, ironically after they promised to be the most transparent administration ever after the left lied about the secrecy surrounding the previous administration, as this administration. Nixon was forced to resign for merely asking the IRS to provide him information on his enemies. Amongst the plethora of abuses and crimes of this administration is the no longer deniable use of the IRS, which actually went far beyond Nixon’s wildest dreams, to help the democratic party coordinate actions and attacks against their political enemies, nut just before the 2010 elections, but which is seemingly still ongoing considering the DOJ keeps turning a blind eye to it.

Tyranny: it’s what’s Obama’s changed America is like.

Circling the wagons, but to no avail…

The left must be seeing the writing on the wall, because they are desperate, and while some believe this is a deliberate strategy, the fact remains that the democrats have shown themselves to be profiteers, liars, crooks, and in general scumbags of the highest orders. Obama has, yet again, set a new low for the office. The latest shenanigans come in response to a poll pointing out that 61% of Americans now see Obama for the liar he is. The many lies about Obamacare are now smacking even the reality challenged leftiods smack dab in the chin.

The left lied about people that liked them being able to keep their plans. They lied about those that liked their doctor being able to keep them too. They lied about the whole thing’s cost to the public as well as the direct costs to individuals. They lied about it covering everyone. They did a bang up job of convincing the saintly leftist lot that likes to do good deeds with other people’s money that the ACA was doing just that, only to then stick it to them. They lied about being ready to implement something this drastic and potentially destructive. In short, they lied about this thing doing anything but destroying a viable healthcare system. But most importantly, they tried to tell people to ignore what was happening to them and to keep sucking the leftist cock, resorting to a victory dance, when what was called for was a wake.

Yeah, the left really believes that if they tell the lie enough times, people will believe it. After all, this strategy has worked well enough for them in the past, but the truth is that people are getting shafted, and nothing serves to force a libtard to be less inclined to swallow the ideological leftard bullshit than a nice slap in the face from reality. Obamacare, with just the individual mandate in play, has done that, and done that hardcore. And just wait until the employer mandate goes into effect. There is a reason they postponed that thing going live until after the 2014 election. They hope they can lie their way out of that one as well before the 2016 election cycle, is my guess.

The thing is that all that lying has finally come home to roost. Here is the gist of it, from the article:

Since it became painfully clear in 2013 that Obama had lied about Obamacare since 2009, it has been increasingly difficult for many Americans to continue accepting at face value his statements on other major public issues. In both the Benghazi and IRS scandals, for example, Obama claimed to have known nothing about them until they were reported in the national media.

But if that were true, why has the president’s attorney general and so many other of his most prominent appointees withheld thousands of documents subpoenaed by Congress and requested by journalists under the Freedom of Information Act? Are there passages in those withheld documents that make it clear Obama knew much more than he has admitted?

Cry wolf all the time, and eventually you are going to get called out. People are then going to realize that where there is smoke there is fire. There are too many other scandals and crimes they lied their way out of, that they now will have people circle back on. Oh sure, I expect the LSM to do its best to keep this under wraps for the 2014 election, after all, they owe their political masters. But the American people, with great reason now that the lying has been exposed, are no longer just willing to drink the Kool-Aid. Even the dumbest people know that it is highly unlikely that you wouldn’t be hiding information that could clear you of an accusation of impropriety, or even criminal activity. And no, the drama around Obamacare and the Obama Administration’s stonewalling is not an isolated incident. The WH is inhabited by a crime syndicate and the likelihood is that those of us that had been calling attention to all the illegal and criminal activity by this WH didn’t even come close to showing how bad they are. There is little joy in being able to say “I told you so” at this point however, considering the pain they are causing us all.

Killing the goose that laid the golden egg

Over at the Hoover Institution journal, they have a damning article, appropriately titled “The United States of Envy”, where they give us a clear picture of the left’s strategy for the coming election:

In advance of the 2014 election, the Obama administration has drawn the political discussion away from its unpopular and flawed healthcare plan, usually called Obamacare, to bring public attention and support for increased income redistribution. President Obama openly encouraged envy of the top one percent of income earners. Reducing the share received by the highest earners to provide revenue for larger transfers to the lowest earners has long been a main objective of his administration. We can all expect this theme to be trumpeted loudly by the mainstream press as the mid-term election approaches: Some of us can have more, the argument goes, if we force others to have less.

The left has done a bang up job of first creating a massive pool of low information voters and then appealing to their vilest and basest emotions to buy votes in return for table scraps. Oh, they will pretend they can make the case that the data supports wealth redistribution as a means to bring prosperity, but it is, as the article points out, bullshit:

Professor Piketty collected data on income distribution from approximately 20 countries over periods of different length. He concluded that raising the tax rate to 60 percent on the highest incomes and redistributing the receipts to the poor would increase spending and economic growth. The New York Times declared his book, Capital in the 21st Century, one of the great achievements of modern economics. It put it in a class with Karl Marx’s Das Kapital and John Maynard Keynes’s General Theory.

This lavish praise seems both wrong and extreme. I agree that in the past there was a notable positive association between economic growth and the spread between the shares of income going to the top 1, 5, or 10 percent of the earners and the share going to the remainder. The mistake is to conclude that narrowing the distribution contributes to growth. The far more plausible explanation is that economic growth in capitalist countries over the past two centuries contributed to a steep decline in the share of the top earners.

Simply put, Piketty, President Obama, and the IMF have the causality running the wrong way. Taxing the rich to redistribute did not produce growth. On the contrary, growth reduced the share earned by the highest earners.

I have never, ever bought the left’s pretense that their laser focus on splitting the pie, instead of growing it, is what has what caused prosperity. This is a ludicrous notion on the face of it and defies common sense. In fact the article points out how wrong this assumption is:

The data show a remarkable degree of uniformity. The share of income received by the top 1 percent declined persistently from about 1910 to 1980. The share fell from an initial 20 to 25 percent of total income to about 5 to 8 percent. Then the share rose in several of the countries, notably the US, the UK, Canada, and Sweden. By the end of the sample data, about 2005, the share in several of these countries was back to about 10 percent. The share of the top 1 percent in the US reached 15 percent, more than half way back to where it was early in the twentieth century. It is this rise that initiated the loud outcries about the failure of modern capitalism to benefit the middle class.

It is impossible for anyone to show that the decline in all seven countries resulted from higher taxes on the highest incomes and redistribution to the poor. The reason is that the welfare state did not exist in several of the countries and was relatively small in the others. In the United States, federal government spending was rarely more 3 or 4 percent of total spending in non-war years until after 1930. Old age pensions didn’t start until the late 1930s, and healthcare spending did not expand until the late 1960s.

What is blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention how this class warfare shit the left banks on always plays out, is that all that excessive taxation that basically amounts to penalizing the successful has accomplished however is to destroy the economic growth that allowed the left to pretend it was what they where doing that helped. Wasteful government spending and crippling crony capitalism that helps the entrenched oligarchy retain their power – that’s what this class warfare is totally about – has left the economy in shambles. And the left has talked a mean talk about doing things to fix this problem of their making while piling on the shit that causes damage. The stake through the heart of the American economy is Obamacare. It will crush our economy.

President Obama’s program works against this process. It doesn’t reward work. It gives the unemployed and underemployed food stamps, healthcare, housing allowances, and income. Instead of working, many learn to live on the government benefits, supplementing them occasionally by working in the underground economy. Instead of acquiring productive skills, they learn how to live without working at regular jobs. That’s one way that the welfare state worked to increase the share of the highest paid 1 percent after 1980. The welfare state contributes also by weakening and even destroying family structure. Single family women are often on the bottom rung of the income distribution.

A system that punishes success and making good choices while rewarding bad behavior and poor choices will encourage more of the later. The welfare state grows precisely because it is rigged to cause more of that. It’s the age old issue that people making a good living solving a problem really have no incentive in doing that, because it means it is the end of their livelihood. The American war against poverty, now more than 6 decades old, has sucked up over $20 trillion, and yet, all we have to show for that is that we have reached a point where the takers outnumber the producers. And the only change we are looking at is for the scales to tip even further, and sadly, I have to admit doing so faster, in the direction it has been going.

The old axiom that collectivism can only give shared misery to all, because that’s the easy solution to the inequality problem, is, yet again, being proven true. But the gangster oligarchy on the left doesn’t care and the sheep that follow them are too stupid to see the writing on the wall. We either turn this thing around and end the class warfare bullshit, or we are looking at another one of those times Heinlein pointed out would come when the few exceptional people that cause prosperity have again be driven into hiding. Collectivism sucks ass.

More selective law enforcement

One of the things that the DOJ gets to do is approve which companies get to merge or not. The other day I wrote about the pending Comcast-Time Warner merger, as a means of pointing out the abuses of this administration, and how, conveniently, democrats are the party you buy special favors from. Well, I now have confirmation of a different angle to the Comcast-Time Warner merger story, and the role the DOJ has been playing in these affairs, in an article by Forbes magazine aptly titled “How Obama’s Justice Department Selectively Blocks Mergers By Republican CEOs. This article posits something I quite suspected when I wrote my previous piece, but avoided because I was too lazy to find backing facts to add to it. Not anymore:

The Obama Department of Justice, led by Eric Holder, must review the merger and decide whether to approve or block it. Unfortunately, the Obama Administration and Justice Department have a long track record of pushing the rule of law aside and making decisions based on politics. Will the proposed Comcast merger with Time Warner Cable receive the scrutiny it deserves, or simply be fast-tracked for approval based on politics?

Every big donor to the Obama administration and the left seems to get special favors. This article mentions United Healthgroup and Obamacare, but there are quite a few other big insurers that are reaping in the dough because of this despicable law. I should also mention the Keystone XL pipeline, which despite the many lies from the left isn’t being blocked for environmental concerns, but because on of Obama and the left’s biggest donors, Warren Buffet, is making a killing shipping this oil by railway. The list goes on and on.

But if you happen to be a company that doesn’t know where your bread should be buttered like AT&T? well then Holder and his crew will block your requests. I have no doubt that history, when the sycophants are no longer lining up to suck Black Jesus’ cock writes about this administration, the story told will be one of abuses of power, denial of freedoms, and an over arching destruction of the way of life that made America great. After all, Obama promised fundamental change, but those of us that pointed out the devil was in the details and we were not having those scrutinized, got accused of being partisan hack racists. Now we are seeing the details, and it is worse than any of us ever dared to believe was possible. This country is in the hands of a criminal syndicate called the democratic party, and the people profiting while the rest of us suffer, is a telling story.

The more things change…

The other day I wrote a post about another leftard that was trying too hard to excuse the evils of communism so they could convince us that what the left is doing these days is for the better, and as I pointed out then, these people are so full of shit that it surprises me they can come up for breath through the bullshit. The left keeps pretending they are the for the little people and that they care, that were it not for the brave actions of the democratic party stalwarts the republicans would side with the rich and rape everyone stupid, but the truth is that when you want special favors, especially as a big company, you go to the left for them. Don’t take my word for it: you don’t get more left leaning than Comcast, a leader in what amounts to a monopolistic industry that because of its incestuous relationship with government manages to rip us all off, and they know whom to buy their favors from.

Comcast, which employs more than 100 lobbyists spent almost $19 million last year on lobbying activities. Its president and CEO, Brian L. Roberts, is a golf buddy of President Obama’s, and a Democratic donor who has contributed thousands of dollars not only to the president’s campaigns, but also to the Democratic Party of Pennsylvania, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the DNC Services Corporation, and to Steny Hoyer, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Bob Casey. Roberts’ executive vice president, David Cohen, is a former aide to Democratic bigwig Ed Rendell. Cohen skirts lobbying regulations through loopholes, has raised more than $2 million for Obama since 2007, and in 2011 hosted a DNC fundraiser at which the president called him “friend.” Cohen has visited the White House 14 times since 2010, including two visits to the Oval Office. He attended the recent dinner for President Hollande of France.

Cohen plays a major role in the Comcast Foundation, which has disbursed more than $3 billion since 2001, primarily to “groups that serve African-Americans, Latinos, and Asians” and other segments of the Democratic coalition. You will be surprised to learn that many of the groups to whom the Comcast Foundation has donated now support the proposed merger. Of the $33 million Comcast has spent on political campaigns since 1989, more than half, or some $18 million, has gone to Democrats. Barack Obama is number one on the list of the top ten recipients of Comcast’s largesse. There are four Republicans on the list.

The party that claims to be the one of the little people would love to convince you that they are not in it for the power and the money, that they do it all, even if they are in it for the power and the money, because of altruism, but it is all horseshit. The only difference between the collectivists and the oligarchs they want to replace, or have replaced, is that they bank on the stupidity of the masses not to see through their plan. But it is the age old fight where one group of people want to take the power and wealth from those that have it. The left has managed to make what they want to do seem noble by pretending they do it to help the little guy, all the while hurting them and making them even more dependent on the left to survive. Shit, I would point out that the old feudal system or the institution of slavery are alive and well in the new world order the left has created. The only difference between then and now is that so many are willing participants and have no clue.

Why do we need new rules for this?

I seriously was baffled that we have to pass new laws to punish government workers abusing power at the IRS. If you have been living under a rock, this is about the IRS specifically, by orders from up on high, targeting the enemies of the Obama administration for political reasons. From the article about the new laws:

A comprehensive tax-reform plan House Republicans will unveil this morning takes dead aim at what Republicans perceive to be the IRS’s persistent abuse of its authority. According to Republican aides familiar with the plan, it will curb the power of the nation’s tax-collecting agency, something Republicans have attempted to do since the agency admitted to improperly singling out conservative non-profit groups last May.

The legislation, authored by Ways and Means Committee chairman Dave Camp (R., Mich.), introduces reforms that directly address the circumstances that led to last year’s scandal. The specter of Lois Lerner looms large in the minds of many Republicans, and the plan mandates the termination of any IRS employee found to have taken official action for political purposes. The 1988 bill that restructured and reformed the IRS spells out ten actions for which the IRS commissioner must terminate an agency employee after an “administrative or judicial determination” that the employee has committed the prohibited action — among them, providing a false statement under oath on a matter involving a taxpayer and violating the rights of a taxpayer. Today’s bill would add the commission of politically motivated acts to the list.

I guess this is why Obama told us there was not a smidgen of a scandal related to the abuse of power at the IRS. If we need to pass a law that prevents IRS employees from using the office to further the political agenda of one party, obviously it means that the IRS going after the enemies of the state, which in the banana republic we have been living in for the last 6 years, by default are the political enemies of the people in power, is not illegal. So, I guess, there is no scandal. But I can’t help but feel that the other political party, even if falsely accused of this or done a fraction of what we know was done, would not have been given this kind of a pass. Nixon says he wants to unresign. After all, he was hounded out of office by the press for just asking the IRS to do some dubious shit. Obama and his people ordered the abuse – let’s stop pretending otherwise please, because you have to be a fucking lying asshole to still think these orders didn’t come from up high – profited from it, and now have a press that is covering up for them.

How do we spell banana republic again?

How do you spell banana republic?

Don’t worry about how to spell, it just look at how the Obama administration and the left have been doing things for the last few years, and you should have a pretty good idea. Yesterday I pointed out how government feels those of us that do not think government should be allowed to disarm us considering how corrupt it is, but that’s just a drop in the bucket of the insane abuses of power going on. Today I would like to point out how vulnerable Senate democrats have had no problem asking the IRS to hamstring the opposition for them, and that the LSM seems quite OK with this incredible abuse of power.

Let’s not pretend that Obama did anything but lie that day he said there was not a smidgen of corruption in that IRS scandal he claims is made up as well. It takes some special kind of gall to lie about not using powerful and unrestrained federal agencies to target your political opponents, but it goes to a whole new level once they no longer even try to hide the fact that they will heavily rely on this sort of abuse to compensate for people wanting to hold them responsible for this sort of lawless and corrupt behavior.

Politics: In the wake of the IRS targeting scandal, which included groups that already had tax exemptions, vulnerable Democrats ask the agency with the power to tax to use that power to destroy their opposition in 2014. The fundamental transformation of the United States into a banana republic, where government power is used to suppress political opposition, has evolved from a hidden campaign targeting the Tea Party and other conservative groups to an open attempt to suppress free speech by changing the definition of what constitutes political activity. It’s an attempt to define conservative political speech out of existence.

The administration cover story — that prior to the 2012 election the sudden increase in the number of such groups applying for tax-exempt status was the reason applications were delayed — has been blown apart by Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich. His Ways and Means Committee found that the groups targeted already had tax exemptions and that 100% of the groups that were targeted with an audit were on the right. Now, Senate Democrats who voted for ObamaCare and parroted President Obama’s lie of the year are asking the IRS to ensure that if they like their Senate seats they can keep their Senate seats. They want the IRS to be a campaign wing of the Democratic Party.

Leading the IRS call is Sen. Charles Schumer, N.Y., the Senate Democrats’ chief political strategist. “The Tea Party elites gained extraordinary influence by being able to funnel millions of dollars into campaigns with ads that distort the truth and attack government,” Schumer said in remarks at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Sharing that belief are vulnerable Democrats such as Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas. He argues the IRS has power over such groups that engage in what he calls quasi-political activity. In reality, such groups are merely people organizing to petition for the redress of grievances, which include reckless spending, oppressive taxation and regulation, and, yes, ObamaCare.

When the democrats called the Tea Party terrorists, then proceeded to hold training for military entities where these people were acting like terrorists, they meant it. Anyone that stands in the way of the left’s agenda and hold on power is a terrorist and obviously evil, a threat to the state, and the left thinks it is fine for them to use the government they control to target them. Let’s not pretend that these people are doing anything but engaging in criminal activity for their own benefit anymore, please. There is no defending this shit.

We should all learn how to spell banana republic, because we are living in one.

If you still doubt what government really thinks about your second amendment rights

Then take a look at this article where government entities again made 2nd amendment , America loving, types the terrorists. Can’t have Islamic terrorist blowing shit up, because that would hurt their sensibilities. After all, these fucking murderers are part of the religion of peace and they will fight back. Accusing people that actually believe in the constitution and that our government has basically destroyed our freedom and our nation, knowing full well that they will not really do anything, but desperately hoping they will, all so the abusive and nanny state government can justify more fascist-type action, is quite cool though.

I have no doubt that the government types feel people that think Leviathan has become too big and has eroded our constitution and limited our freedoms, especially while they are actively trying to deny us the right to protect ourselves from them, are a bigger threat than the people that have told us they will force us all to bow to their god or kill us otherwise. Historically tyrannies have always feared their people far more than they have feared any foreign enemy, after all.

The ONG 52nd Civil Support Team training scenario involved a plot from local school district employees to use biological weapons in order to advance their beliefs about “protecting Gun Rights and Second Amendment rights.” Portsmouth Fire Chief Bill Raison told NBC 3 WSAZ-TV in Huntington, West Virginia that the drill accurately represented “the reality of the world we live in,” adding that such training “helps us all be prepared.”

Internal ONG documents provided to Media Trackers after repeated delays provide further context to what WSAZ-TV reported last winter. In the disaster-preparedness scenario, two Portsmouth Junior High School employees poisoned school lunches with mustard gas, acting on orders from white-nationalist leader William Pierce.

The ONG team discovered biological weapons being produced in the school, requiring activation of containment and decontamination procedures.

Yeah, this sure as hell makes perfect sense! A government that spies on us all, all the time, and uses its powers to attack its enemies of course is going to think that people that see it for what it is will revert to using schools to wage war against it. But us pointing out how said government is abusing its powers and tyrannical in nature, is people engaging is conspiracy theories. And the government is already preparing to turn loose its military on people it doesn’t like. Have no doubt that that’s precisely what these exercises are about: identifying any entities within the chain of command of the ONG that might not follow orders.

You can not parody the stupid and evil on the left I tell ya.