Tag: Government wastes YOUR money.

I hope he gets elected just for this

Just so we can finally have someone have a politician that can claim they reduced the rediculously large size of a bureaucratic, inefficient, politically biased, corrupt, and largely inept government and be right about it. And all we would need is for Trump to be elected!

If you needed more proof our government was not serving us citizens, shit like this should leave you with no doubt that Leviathan could stand to shed some of the bloat. Yeah, I know that Trump’s election would only remove 25% of its size 9if these shitbags actually were kind enough to keep their word), and I personally would prefer to see at least half of it, if not more, go up in smoke. I wonder if these idiots would also move to Canada and do the country a double service!

Obamacare’s first day must have been a doozie…

But from this revelation, things must not be looking so good to the people that are telling us this thing is the best thing to come since fire, the wheel, or sliced bread. From the article:

While the Obama administration has touted the opening of the Obamacare exchanges as a win for Americans, it is not be releasing any data on the number of people who successfully enrolled Tuesday.

“We’re not releasing that information yet,” Marilyn Tavenner, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, told reporters when pressed for information about the number of people who enrolled in the Obamacare exchanges on a Tuesday conference call.

“We will be releasing enrollment statistics regularly, but we can confirm that people have enrolled both through the state marketplace and the federally-facilitated marketplace,” Tavenner said.

Asked why the government is not releasing information on how many people enrolled Tuesday, Julie Bataille, the director of CMS’ office of communications, said that the data is still being processed.

“I would just point to historical experience getting data and what we have seen with other implementation efforts over time,” Bataille said. “And what we know that it takes some time to pull accurate data and information together so we will be able to do that for you as soon as we can and we’ll make sure we let you know what that schedule will be.”

You think that if the numbers were anything but abysmal, that they wouldn’t be doing a dance and trying t spin this as a positive instead of saying they needed time to count the numbers? How long can it take to count to zero or numbers that don’t even come out to statistical margins of error? Heh.

I knew it could not just be me feeling this way..

That all the bullshit from the left about equality doesn’t exactly mean what most people think is either right or just, and that’s a good thing to discover:

Today, just 35 percent of voters believe the economy is fair to middle-class Americans. Only 41 percent believe it is fair to those who are willing to work hard.

Some politicians, particularly Democrats, are better at acknowledging the importance of fairness, but they have a pretty limited definition of what it means. They complain about income inequality but ignore the larger context.

For most Americans, the context is very important. If a CEO gets a huge paycheck after his company received a government bailout, that’s a problem. People who get rich through corporate welfare schemes are seen as suspect. On the other hand, 86 percent believe it’s fair for people who create very successful companies to get very rich.

In other words, it’s not just the income; it’s whether the reward matched the effort. People don’t think it’s a problem that Steve Jobs got rich. After all, he created Apple Computer and the iPad generation. But there was massive outrage about the bonuses paid to AIG executives after that company was propped up by the federal government.

On a more routine basis, most Americans are offended by the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street. The practice of working for the government to network and then cash in with a firm that needs your government contacts is seen as fair only by those who practice it.

The revolving door hints at the larger problem. The United States is supposed to be a land of opportunity, where everyone can pursue their dreams. Throughout our history, many have started with nothing and risen to the top. But those on top today are busy rewriting the rules to limit entry into their club.

I bolded that section I think is critical. Nothing disgusts me more than hearing the class warriors talk about fairness and wealth redistribution, because their idea of either is a sham. Fairness to the “Champions of the little people”, yes that’s sarcasm, is them deciding who wins and who loses. Big banks, big corps, and big donors, win the day. The leftists act indignant that anybody disagrees with their confiscation of wealth, but then we find out their laws excuse or benefit the really rich leftists they trot out to tell us how noble it is to pay more taxes. When these leftists are simply not paying the taxes they did not give themselves a loophole in the law for – look into how many Obamaites have problems with the IRS – they are avoiding them. Remember John Kerry, man of the people, “did I tell you I won 3 purple hearts” warrior, multi-millionaire by marriage and tax increase lion on the left and his Yacht? He parked that in RI to avoid the taxes his ilk stuck other residents of the state he represents, Massachusetts, with. What a noble man.

Then you have the example of the stimulus. Close to $1 trillion was funneled to the Democratic Party’s special interests, lobbyists, friends, and own campaign coffers, helping prop up public sector constituents, while the private sector got stuck with the bill and the pain of the other attempts to socio-engineer the problems their previous socio-engineering had caused. Don’t get me talking about the TARP bailouts. I disliked the idea when it was floated when Boosh was president, but when the donkeys took over, they doubled the money, and they funneled it all to their special friends on Wall Street, like the article points out. Oh, the LSM helped the donkeys convince the usual low information voter that the despicable behavior by the CEOs of the bailed out companies was not part & parcel of the usual incestuous relationship between these big business entities and government, and in particular the favor buying schemes favored by the demcorats, was just the fault of Wall Street, but Wall Street could not have done what they where doing without the politicians that have rigged the system the way it is. Now, 5 years down the line, I suspect that if we had just let the lot of those “too big to fail” financial institutions go belly up, we would have a lot less of the left’s socio-engineering, but our economy would be better off, and not stuck in this rut.

I am glad to find most Americans still believe hard work should provide the opportunity to make your rich, while an incestuous relationship with government allowing you to make money, stay in business when you should not for whatever reason, or allows you to crowd out competition, are all bad things. And we need to put an end to government employees going from those jobs to Wall Street, where they make a killing, by paying off politicians – practically always from one party which claims to be serving the little people – to then get paid ridiculous cash for getting those favors from their buddies and party mates left in government. It is just as despicable that our government gets to pick winners and losers and is in bed with all these too big to fail institutions that all rip off the tax payers as the wealth redistribution schemes to buy votes are. We should have a law that prohibits people from leaving government to go make money for these too big to fail firms where they are making huge money by using their connections to buy favors in return for huge donations to political campaigns. We stop this practice by preventing government from having that ability. I bet you the democrats, and especially the super rich democrats that want to keep their special circle clean of riff raff they do not approve of, would never let that happen though, even when they tell you that the other party is the one for the rich.

Why should they worry? You are paying for it anyway.

The next time you hear some leftard or their mouth pieces in the LSM crying about how painful any kind of government cuts are to make remember this story about the TSA spending money when the seqeuster kicks in. In a nutshell:

Under their new collective bargaining agreement, Transportation Security Administration officers get to spend more taxpayer money on their uniforms every year than a United States Marine Corps lieutenant can spend in a lifetime.

“TSA employees will see their uniform allowances nearly double to $446 per year,” the House Transportation Committee noted in a press release on the TSA’s new collective bargaining agreement. “By comparison, a combat Marine Lieutenant receives a one-time uniform allowance of $400. The cost of the increase in TSA uniform allowance is an estimated $9.63 million annually.”

I bet you these uniforms are coming from some big friend of team Blue who’s making a killing with these contracts.