Tag: Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration

Yeah sure, that was a great idea…

For those that still doubt the deal between the Obama administration and Iran was anything but disatrous for the world and beneficial to one of the planet’s most dangerous regimes, just pay attention to what Khameini had to say about it:

Iran’s top leader on Wednesday said missiles were key to the Islamic Republic’s future, offering support to the hardline Revolutionary Guards that have drawn criticism from the West for testing ballistic missiles.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei supported last year’s nuclear deal with world powers but has since called for Iran to avoid further rapprochement with the United States and its allies, and maintain its economic and military strength.

“Those who say the future is in negotiations, not in missiles, are either ignorant or traitors,” Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters of state, was quoted as saying by his website.

“If the Islamic Republic seeks negotiations but has no defensive power, it would have to back down against threats from any weak country.”

His comments may have been directed at former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the de facto leader of a more moderate political alliance, who last week tweeted “the future is in dialogue, not missiles”.

Some context. Iran is by some accounts the world’s most prolific terror enabler, and its leadership is hell bent on killing Jews and destroying Israel and The Great Satan (that is the US for some of you people that believe the bullshit about the bad guy being the US) to push their messianic end of world agenda. To do so they have decided, like North Korea, that the only thing that will give them protection and power to pursue their agenda is the ability to not just threaten nuclear destruction in the case of the Norks, but to be able to carry this out. Only a fool doubt’s Iran’s promise to rain death on its enemies.

Too many people chose to disregard and instead try to appease Hitler when he was very clear about what his end goal was, and while one can make the argument that not every tinpot dictatorship is on the way to a similar roadmap, Iran’s leader has been adamant and active in working towards their agenda. Just remember that every Arab state was fine living with a nuclear armed Israel and never bothered with their own need for a nuclear deterrent or offensive capability. Most, like the bulk of the European nations and Korea and Japan, accepted assurances from the US and whatever Atlantic or Pacific alliance existed that they would be protected and treated as part of whatever deterrent capability was available. Along comes Iran (which is not Arab) and gets its bomb going, only to be appeased by the Obama administration which has also gone to great extremes to piss on every US ally’s leg and tell them it was just warm rain, and now we have every single one of these Arab states suddenly telling the the world they are going to get their own bomb.

The great legacy of the Obama administration, other than to make GWB look like a genius president and a top foreign policy administration, will be the destabilization and nuclearization of the Middle East, very likely to be followed by a nuclear global conflict. But hey, like with everything the collectivist idiots believe in and do, what we will be told we should focus on to determine if they were successful and did good, is that they meant well. With people ruled by feelings and emotions and so focused on social justice, whatever that nonsense is presented to mean to the rest of us, results don’t matter. After all, they firmly believe that they can change not just the laws of nature and economics, but that what counts is that they meant well.

As I predicted Obama made the impossible possible and managed to make what amounted to at most a mediocre president across the board look like a fucking genius and statesman. Be honest. Don’t you miss the cowboy by now? I know most of the world does, even if they won’t admit it out of spite. We deserve the disaster headed our way after the left destroyed the very system that brought the west prosperity and peace in the name of their new government backed collectivist religion.


What is missing from this revelation?

Yesterday I had a post about how a communication by the NAVY Sec Mabus clearly showed that the military was about to lower standards for access into some of the most demanding and dangerous combat specialties due to the demands from the PC political class. Today we have a revelation form retired Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis about how horrible the current US foreign policy landscape looks.

Because the United States lacks a global strategy, “volatility is going to get to the point that chaos threatens,” a former Central Command (CENTCOM) commander told a Heritage Foundation audience Wednesday.

Speaking in Washington, D.C., retired Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis said, “the perception is we’re pulling back” on America’s commitment to its allies and partners, leaving them adrift in a changing world. “We have strategic atrophy.”

Again the missing item here is what? I am not even gonna bother with a long lead up and just point out that the elephant in the room is that the idiots that were going to stop the rise of the oceans, heal the rift that warmonger devil Boosh caused with his cowboyism between us and every civilized nation on the planet, and show the world that the dog that rolls over and exposes it’s neck and belly to the aggressors would garner their sympathy and get them to stand down.

Yes, this for me is an opportunity to again point out that I told you so. In my wildest nightmares I couldn’t think anyone would do more harm than Carter did, but Team Obama has usurped that title with panache and certainty. People forgot how dismal democrats are at anything that has to do with the real world, and it reflects, not just in the current economic and political climate at home, but in our foreign policy and the disasters of the last 6 years, as well. I wonder if that Nobel Peace Committee has thought about asking Obama to return the prize they gave him to spite Boosh? I am certain that all the other idiots around the globe that rooted for an Obama win – with the exception of the ones in countries such as China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela amongst a long list of rogue nations that were salivating at the chops for another weak ass in chief – and the subsequent “maturity” in the new US foreign policy are kicking themselves these days.

Our enemies get treated like a hooker afraid of pissing off her pimp, while our friends get treated like the hooker by her pimp. It’s a shame and a travesty. The world is now a more dangerous place because the supposed adults have been in charge and have done a “reset”. The consequences of having these in charge will be felt for a long time, and we have not yet seen the worst of it.

I would not be surprised..

That Iran’s claim that the desperate pussies in the Obama administration are again acting like the pussies collectivist tend to always be, and then for clearly craven political reasons, is absolutely true. This administration is going to eventually be seen, when the historians finally actually get to look at the things they did, as one of the biggest failures ever. No amount of revisionist history, media cover for their fellow collectivists, or even sycophantic pandering by people willing to line up and suck Obama cock, just because of their “My Team,” feelings, will change that reality. They are desperate for something – anything – to show they are not the abject failures they are. Hence the constant stupidity and the dangerous display of absolute incompetence and weakness that leads to things like this. yeah, I bet they are begging Iran for a bone. Any bone.

I am going to rub it in. Back when the fucking leftards were telling us all how stupid Boosh’s cowboy diplomacy was and that what we needed was mature and capable collectivists to take over to fix things, I pointed out this was all bullshit. Leftards suck at foreign policy precisely because they hold such a high opinion of themselves that they believe they can do not just the improbable, but the impossible. Most people don’t remember the incompetence of the Carter years. Carter thought his good intentions and his willingness to do what feelers on the left think is the right thing would garner him the support of people not just with their own agenda, but of evil people. That’s why he was so butt-hurt when the Russians went into Afghanistan. Brezhnev had after all promised him that the USSR wouldn’t do that! Carter was a moron. And the bulk of people that share his idiotic and naive beliefs – which pretty much amounts to all collectivists and the democratic party as a singular entity these days – world view are always going to not only be surprised by the wolves in sheep’s clothing, but end up on the short end of any deal. Always.

Obama however has been far worse than Carter was. His administration has not only been more than willing to drop to their knees to suck the cocks of people that are clearly our enemies, but they have treated our allies, especially those that were considered our closest ones, with scorn and disdain on top of that. I have said it before and will say it again: At the risk of insulting amateurs, this administration’s foreign policy, and for that matter anything else other than their agenda to destroy the country, is amateur hour at the freak show. Not that these idiots will ever get called on it until long from now when historian take a look at the shit that went down and the damage it has caused will we finally understand how bad they were/are.

Diplomacy in the age of Obama

When a friend sent me this link and I read the article, I thought I was looking at an Onion piece of humor. From the WaPo link:

Secretary of State John Kerry is in Paris after the White House apologized for not sending a high-ranking official to a massive unity rally after the terrorist attacks there.

And he brought a friend by the name of James Taylor.

And James Taylor sang “You got a friend” to the Cheese-eating-surrender-monkeys.

I guess it could have been worse: they could have sent Kerry to France with an iPod full of Obama speeches.

Calling the shit coming out of this WH amateur hour is an insult to amateurs. Remember these fuckwads telling us how bad Boosh was at foreign policy? Yeah, well, they make the stupid shit Boosh did look like pure genius these days.

You can’t make this level of stupid up. You just can’t. For those that have still not wizened up, Obama’s fundamentally changed America is basically a fucking shithole run by incompetent and stupid fucks that rob the productive blind.

Maybe they should send Dolly Parton to Moscow to sing for Putin or something. Them big titties might mellow the guy out!


Remember that if someone had done a parody like this about these bozos, we would all be hearing that it was done because the producer was a racist/evil bastard. But there they go doing it in real life. Priceless.

Premature Nobel Peace Prize not worth it..

I remember tons of pompous liberal douchebags telling everyone back when how their side would handle the dangerous and problematic world much better than the cocaine cowboy, whom they accused of turning everyone against the US, and thus, being inept at foreign policy. From the infamous and stupid “Russian Reset”, which I might add had to be admitted was a horrible failure even by your usual DNC propagandists, to all the new “kinetic actions” our Nobel Peace Prize winner has managed to get us involved in for no positive gain, it has been failure after failure. Heck, I now am convinced that the Obama administration outright lied about what happened in Benghazi to cover up some highly illegal shit they were involved with and to give them a means to push for government oversight, if not outright control, of social media – the eternal enemy of tyrannical government – because no crisis should go to waste. Remember these are the criminals that thought up “Fast & Furious”, another illegal campaign that for all intents & purposes was an act of war on a neighbor, so they could use the fallout from that dastardly and evil move to influence US public sentiment to move towards their anti-second amendment beliefs, which I should point out is another one of the big spokes in the wheel of tyrannical governments all over the place.

The fact is that the US, since Obama took office, and even more pronounced right now, has nothing but a failed foreign policy after failed foreign policy. The thing was amateur hour under Hillary Clinton’s watch, and is making amateur hour look good under Kerry’s watch. Obama picked both of these unqualified idiots for purely political reasons, which should have been a red flag about how serious president “I am looking for OJ’s wife’s killer on golf courses, because that brother is now in jail and can’t do that himself” , takes foreign policy in the first place. The US foreign policy of Obama tenure – the last 6 years – has basically amounted to us pissing on our friend’s legs and telling them it was warm rain, while dropping onto our knees to suck our enemy’s cocks. If you doubt how ineffective and destructive the pretenders have been, take it from one of the people Obama and his crowd told us would actually engage with them because they were willing to drop down on all four and prostrate themselves to show an eagerness to talk, and weep:

The Iranian president’s senior advisor has called President Barack Obama “the weakest of U.S. presidents” and described the U.S. leader’s tenure in office as “humiliating,” according to a translation of the highly candid comments provided to the Free Beacon.

The comments by Ali Younesi, senior advisor to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, come as Iran continues to buck U.S. attempts to woo it into the international coalition currently battling the Islamic State (IS, ISIL, or ISIS).

Yeah, that’s pretty much par for the course and exactly what all of us that had experienced the Carter years pointed out would happen back in the days the smug leftards were lecturing everyone about the failures of the cowboy and how much better they would do. I disliked the Boosh policy towards Iran’s nuclear program and have always believed that talk alone would not prevent this from happening, but what has been going on under Obama makes the Boosh approach look like pure genius, and it shows every day we hear a story about how nobody takes us seriously anymore.

Yeahm I am gonna do it: “I told you so you morons”. Pitty we all suffer because of these inempt buffoons.

WTF does Black Jesus mean with this?

Can you imagine a revelation like this by a republican not causing a firestorm? WTF is it with these people? How can Black Jesus say shit like this and it not causing some furor? From the article:

This will not go over well for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner.

According to the new book “Double Down,” in which journalists Mark Halperin and John Heilemann chronicle the 2012 presidential election, President Barack Obama told his aides that he’s “really good at killing people” while discussing drone strikes.

Peter Hamby of The Washington Post noted the moment in his review of the book. The reported claim by the commander-in-chief is as indisputable as it is grim.

I am sure he was misunderstood. Yeah right. Megalomaniacs actually say the stupid shit and constantly lie like this guy, so one can be pardoned for thinking he is one after so many of these TWF moments. Go Black Jesus! Rack up that kill count. It’s not like the people in the LSM lining up to suck your cock will think any worse of you. I am sure they would have given Boosh a pass if he had said something like this…

And the fallout from Obama’s failed Syria efforts, begins.

So Obama had to put away his Syrian war boner because Putin played him. The winners in that event were clearly Assad and Putin. The clear loser is US credibility. The left is desperate to pretend otherwise, but I am predicting that they won’t pull it off. These amateurs are just too full of themselves and too stupid to know better. So now, with everyone basically saying Obama is weak, they are desperate to look though.

Let me make a prediction: unless Obama needs another distraction for his scandals at home, this administration won’t attack Iran. The left has no interest in using the military to protect American interests and Americans. To them the US military is a fucking bunch of Neanderthals to be used to do humanitarian bullshit. The only time they think US armed forces should be used is when it costs America and produces nothing, or when they stand to profit from the use themselves, directly, which is exactly what Syria was about. Iran has nothing to worry about. Our credentialed elite are going to talk all though, but as long as the Iranians just lay low, they will get to keep building their nukes & doing their thing in the ME without any fear from the current administration.

Despite their need to look all butch after Putin bitchslapped them silly, the Obama admin has no desire to do things that help America. Watch them waste millions in another missile strike in some no name, no where spot, where there will be no effective reason or value for the US. The odds of this escalate as this administration becomes more desperate for some cover to distract people from their many malfeasances at home. I hear Jimmy Carter is doing the manu-weasel with a modified jig. Obama has taken the title of most ineffective dunce from him. Narcissus called Obama: he wants his game back, dude.

Is this Syria thing about Obama’s promise to screw over brown energy?

When I recently read that Saudi Arabia was backing a US strike on Syria two things popped into my head. The first was that Saudi Arabia has a war boner when it comes to Iran, and Syria is Irans bitch, so that would make sense. But there was something else that I couldn’t put my finger on until just the other day. that was that Saudi Arabia would benefit graitly from more instabillity and military action in the ME, because by default, even talking about this sort of military intervention would jack up oil prices.

And that’s a connection noby has made yet. Black Jesus promised us that he would kneecap brown energy, by driving up it’s cost and shutting down its use, and this move against Syria is sure to do a lot of that. Not to mention that the new found war boner by the left comes right at a time when crude prices were in decline. That is, until they started talking about the need to bomb Syria. There more I analyse this WH’s reason for wanting to expend oodles of cash lobbing expensive missiles at Syria, the more I come away thinking that Obama’s strategy isn’t random, but more of that “fundamental change” shit he promissed. Only now that we are seeing what that fundamental change entails, it is some butt ugly stuff.

There is something not right about this whole Syria thing, and the more I think of it, the more frightened I get.

For those that were still thinking we need to intervene in Syria

I present this tid-bit from the NYT about how nice those Syrian rebels really are.

The Syrian rebels posed casually, standing over their prisoners with firearms pointed down at the shirtless and terrified men.

The prisoners, seven in all, were captured Syrian soldiers. Five were trussed, their backs marked with red welts. They kept their faces pressed to the dirt as the rebels’ commander recited a bitter revolutionary verse.

“For fifty years, they are companions to corruption,” he said. “We swear to the Lord of the Throne, that this is our oath: We will take revenge.”

The moment the poem ended, the commander, known as “the Uncle,” fired a bullet into the back of the first prisoner’s head. His gunmen followed suit, promptly killing all the men at their feet.

This scene, documented in a video smuggled out of Syria a few days ago by a former rebel who grew disgusted by the killings, offers a dark insight into how many rebels have adopted some of the same brutal and ruthless tactics as the regime they are trying to overthrow.

I understand anger and the need for revenge. Where I draw the line is making propaganda videos of the violence. That’s no longer about anger or revenge. Then you also hear that these “poor moderate rebels“, them is John “Francois” Kerry’s words, are busy killing some other problem people. Seriously, these rebels are about as bad, if not worse, than Assad and his clowns.

Look, I will say it again: the best outcome for us in the west is that these people all fight each other to the end. Arm both sides, piecemeal and moderately so neither can get an upper hand, and let them duke it out. Like the Iran-Iraq war, we should all be rooting for – and if possible working towards that goal – both sides to lose. One would think that the lessons of Libya and Egypt would have made that abundantly clear by now, but our credentialed elite intellectual-wanna-be collectivist foreign policy experts, the ones that replaced the cowboy and were going to get the whole world to love us again, are too stupid, too craven, or both.

Leave Syria alone. There is no reason other than to give Team Obama some cover from the scandals that should be leading the news for Syria to even be a concern to us. When you hear stories of emboldened and entrenched leftist senior government bureaucrats EPA SWAT team harasses gold miners in Alaska, or better yet, that workers are yet again getting laid off in higher numbers, and especially as Obama’s signature law, Obamacare, is revealed for the disaster it really is, I can see why Obama and other big government types like keeping Syria in the news.

Shut this idiotic story down. Let those monsters kill eachother off, and lets get down to business discussing how corrupt and tyrannical our best and most transparent administration ever really is and how they are on full assault mdoe against our liberties and rights. That’s the war we should be fighting.

Timely post on Syria from a military perspective

Strategy Page has an awesome post about why the public in Western countries have turned on their leader’s decision to intervene in Syria, because of the supposed use of Chemical weapons by the Assad regime on the opposition. Now, remember that these leaders suddenly feel compelled to act because of some hard to verify attack that killed some 300 to 1000 people, depending on the source, in a conflict where over 100,000 people have been killed through conventional weapons. My opinion of why Obama is so gung-ho about doing something in Syria is well known, and I am willing to bet, dead on too, but the reason why people in general are against any military intervention at all, even when WMDs have been used, is something that has not been properly explored. And the Strategy Page article seems to do a decent job of explaining the why. From the article:

Western leaders have been slow to accept this unpleasant news but the voters, who pay for these attacks in money and blood, have a veto power and they are exercising it. The Internet has spread the personal experience of Western troops far and wide and the mindset of Arabs in conflict areas is now widely known in the West. The continued popularity of Islamic terrorism among so many Moslems, including many living in the West, adds to this sense of disgust and distrust.

This shift in attitude has been building for over a decade. Iraq demonstrated that, as has the after-effects of the Arab Spring, where Arabs, freed from log-time dictators, voted Islamic radicals into power. That was stupid even by Arab standards and the Arab public is now trying to repair that damage. But the corruption and lack of responsible leadership and general unreliability of Arabs has put off the West, even in the face of a great humanitarian disaster in Syria. It’s not the first time this has happened. The West pulled out of Somalia in 1993 because of frustration with trying to help people who won’t make much of an effort to help themselves and were more interested in killing and stealing.

The West is learning why the Turks were so glad to be rid of their Arab subjects after the Ottoman Empire collapsed a century ago. Then there is the corruption and intense hatreds found among the Arabs. It’s a very volatile and unpredictable part of the world and always has been. For centuries, the West was shielded from this reality because the Ottoman Turks ruled most of the Arabs.

And that in a nutshell is the problem in the Middle East: corruption, clannishness, ineffective leadership, and general unreliability of both the people and their leadership simply makes any attempt to bring order and prosperity of any kind to these countries a futile effort. These people are their own worst enemy. More frightening is their belief that the Islamist somehow, because they preach it, at least in their minds, will provide the solution. Instead, what they end up with are things like Khomeini’s Iran, the Taliban in Afghanistan, or Brotherhood in Egypt, and even more pain and problems as the corruption now is coupled with brutal and randomized abuses of power.

The fact is that we now see that the Arabs are basically dysfunctional people. Sure we can blame colonialism and borders created by the old colonial empires for this dysfunction, like the marxist academicians that hate the West for not succumbing to the collectivist yoke have been doing, but it would all be a stupid simplification of a much uglier and bigger problem, if not, and outright lie. Nobody, including these Arabs, can function on a scale beyond the family or clan. When you consider everyone outside your clan or family to be a mark, there is no way to create the concept of a country. That’s also why these Arab states do not function without a dictator and Muhammad needed Islam to bring some order to them in the hopes that combining religion with politics would yield an answer. Never worked out well, and it only left us with a death cult.

That Strategy page article goes into some great detail about all the problems in the ME and how the Western people are finally wising up to these facts. Consequently, we are far less likely to get public support for action, even when our leaders pretend the reason they want to bomb someone is humanitarian, instead of to provide cover for their own corruption and abuses of power. We may not yet be at the point where everyone is comfortable saying that the Arabs, because of what they believe and how they deal with the world around them and other people, are their own worst enemy yet, but we are almost there. And don’t let the idiotic meme currently pushed by Obama sycophants in the LSM that the reason people are much more cautious and less inclined to support intervention in Syria, even when we are promised that they will not put boots on the ground, is because of Iraq, and particularly their rewriting of history about how Boosh lied to get us into Iraq (since everyone knew there were no WMDs), fool you. It is a giant pile of bullshit. If Iraq plays a role it is that people have wizened up after seeing that after all the sacrifices we did to rid them of their tyrant and his oppression, they went right back to business as usual and turned the place into a shithole. That’s the story there. People no longer want to waste treasure, time, and blood on people that revert to stupidity when given a new chance.

Besides, people aren’t stupid. Most of us clearly see that this attack is nothing but a diversion. An attempt to distract us from all the bad shit they are doing. And the “they” are both democrats and republicans. Leave Syria alone. Let those fuckers do their thing. If anything, arm both sides and let them wipe each other out. That’s the only win-win for those of us that have wizened up.