Tag: criminal conduct

Well, that’s because it is all lies you tools!

WaPo has a laughable article titled Hillary Clinton’s email story continues to get harder and harder to believe where they actually contort themselves into pretzels trying to avoid saying the obvious: She is a liar and lying about the fact she broke the law and is trying to stall the required prosecution and incarceration. From the article:

On Monday night, the Associated Press published a piece noting the release of an additional 165 pages of emails Hillary Clinton sent from her private email address while serving as secretary of state. These were emails that had never been previously released and only were made public because of a court order in response to a request from a conservative group.

And yet again, the emails poke holes in Clinton’s initial explanation for why she decided to exclusively use a private email server for her electronic correspondence while serving as the nation’s top diplomat.

Let’s start with this from the AP story: “The emails were not among the 55,000 pages of work-related messages that Clinton turned over to the agency in response to public records lawsuits seeking copies of her official correspondence.”

Remember that Clinton and a small group of people working for her reviewed all of the emails she sent from her private server and made the decision about what was solely personal and what was work-related. She handed over the work-related email and permanently deleted those that she and her team decided were purely personal. She wound up deleting more emails than she turned over to State.

The latest batch of emails suggest that Clinton’s filter to decide between the personal and the professional was far from foolproof. That these emails never saw the light of day before Monday — or before a conservative legal advocacy group petitioned for their release — opens up the possibility that there are plenty more like them that Clinton chose to delete but shouldn’t have. And it provides more fodder for the Republican argument that Clinton appointing herself as judge, jury and executioner for her emails was, at best, a very, very bad decision and, at worst, something more nefarious than just bad judgment.

Yeah, see the issue here is the language being used. Chizilla seems to go out of his way to make this something passive instead of pointing out that this was done, and done on purpose to hide what these scumbags were doing, which obviously leads one to the only actual and accurate conclusion, that Hillary and practically everyone else in the Obama administration related to this have been lying their asses off. I find it insulting when the democrat agents with bylines in the MSM all go out of their way to make Hillary innocent in this case, even going so far as presenting her as some technophobe and old doggering fool.

I guess saying she is just an old grandma and not the shyster she is seems to make the left feel they have an out, but as a voter, I wouldn’t be inclined to cast mine for someone that seems to, from the media’s attempts to hide her criminal activity, be suffering from dementia. She could just press that button and nuke somewhere in Arkansas where one of Bill’s ex-mistresses is hiding, or Chicago to get the Obamas, in a fit of anger.

I ask again, do you think a republican candidate – other than Trump whom seems to be the LSM’s kryptonite – get away with this shit? If you can answer honestly, you know how insulting it is to others that actually followed the law or were hammered for breaking or appearing to break it by this administration.

Hillary needs to be wearing orange or stripped jumpsuits and pursue a career making license plates. That would be justice in this case. And she needs to be joined by people like Lerner whom now clearly is in contempt of congress and a criminal.

One set of rules for thee

And willy-nilly enforcement of rules for my buddies and me, and as has the standard with the crooks running the country, they are hard at work obstructing any investigation of their cronies:

FBI agents working alongside Utah state prosecutors in a wide-ranging corruption investigation have uncovered accusations of wrongdoing by two of the U.S. Senate’s most prominent figures — Majority Leader Harry Reid and rising Republican Sen. Mike Lee — but the Justice Department has thwarted their bid to launch a full federal investigation.

The probe, conducted by one Republican and one Democratic state prosecutor in Utah, has received accusations from an indicted businessman and political donor, interviewed other witnesses and gathered preliminary evidence such as financial records, Congressional Record statements and photographs that corroborate some aspects of the accusations, officials have told The Washington Times and ABC News.

But the Justice Department’s public integrity section — which normally handles corruption cases involving elected figures — rejected FBI agents’ bid to use a federal grand jury and subpoenas to determine whether the accusations are true and whether any federal crimes were committed by state and federal officials.

The information involving Mr. Reid and Mr. Lee is not fully developed but centers on two primary issues:

• Whether both or either politician sought or received money or other benefits from donors and/or fundraisers in connection with doing political favors or taking official actions.

• Whether Mr. Lee provided accurate information when he bought, then sold a Utah home for a big loss to a campaign contributor and federal contractor, leaving his mortgage bank to absorb large losses.

“There are allegations, but they are very serious allegations and they need to be looked at by somebody,” Sim Gill, a Democrat who is the elected chief prosecutor in Salt Lake County, told The Times. “If true, or even if asserted, they truly should be investigated and put to rest, or be confirmed.”

Remember the promises of the most ethical and transparent administration ever back in the day the left kept lying about how Boosh was both a retarded chimp and an evil mastermind, constantly abusing the law, cheating the American public, and obstructing justice? Well guess what: those of us that mentioned this was just projection by people that figured since they would certainly do it if they were in power, that the other side had to be doing it too (that and healthy dose of believing that the end justifies the means so lying is fine), and that we would have neither transparency nor ethical behavior from the left, sure seem vindicated. Yet again.

These people are criminals. They are unethical and care little what laws they violate, because they justify their actions as doing good. That they are doing what is good for them, regardless of the damage they cause, doesn’t matter to them or the rubes that line up to suck their cocks. Woe any of us though that dares to get in their way. Then they will warp the law, and even abuse it, to make us pay. Our country is basically being run by a bunch of infantile tyrants with delusions of grandeur and severe self-esteem issues. It is beyond tragic and vile, but of course, the problem is with people like me that dare point out that this is how leftists always end up behaving when they get power.

Reid, along with Holder and Obama, all deserve to spend the rest of their lives in prison making license plates for the people of this country. Instead these people continue to rob us blind.

Glenn H. Reynolds’ article about conspiracy theories..

Glenn Harlan Reynolds has an article titled Government conspiracy theories aren’t crazy: Column in USA today that is spot on about the damage the Obama Administration and their incestuous relationship with a complicit media have resulted into. Glenn speaks about the IRS abuses, the fake investigation by a crony that of course found nothing wrong, and the whole NSA situation, and concludes as follows:

Spend a little while on Twitter or in Internet comment sections and you’ll see a significant number of people who think that the NSA may have been relaying intelligence about the Mitt Romney campaign to Obama operatives, or that Chief Justice John Roberts’ sudden about-face in the Obamacare case might have been driven by some sort of NSA-facilitated blackmail. A year ago, these kinds of comments would have been dismissable as paranoid conspiracy theory. But now, while I still don’t think they’re true, they’re no longer obviously crazy. And that’s Obama’s legacy: a government that makes paranoid conspiracy theories seem possibly sane.

The problem with government is that to be trusted, you have to be trustworthy. And the problem with the Obama administration is that, to a greater extent than any since Nixon’s, it is not. Do not be surprised if the result is that people mistrust those in authority, and order their lives accordingly. Such an outcome is bad for America, but bad governance has its consequences.

Dead on. for all their posturing during the Boosh years no serious liberal ever thought he was doing 99% of the shit they accused him of. It was all politics. Scorched earth politics, but politics. Team Obama however has done real nasty shit, and people now expect anything from them. Most people have gotten here late. It took a slew of things to finally open their eyes. The NSA, IRS, and Benghazi scandals being the latest in a long list of abuses. Me, I knew we were dealing with criminals that thought they were above the law the moment I became familiar with the DOJ’s role in both voter the numerous fraud investigations and the Fast & Furious gun running fiasco. The first was o cover up for clear abuses. The second was to use what amounts to an act of war against a sovereign neighbor to score political points at home with the objective of disarming the citizenry. The first thing every corrupt and evil government on our planet has done is to make sure it has sole access to the means of violence, especially against its subjects/serfs. Disarming law abiding citizens, under the guise of protecting them, is always the recourse of scoundrels.

By the time Benghazi rolled around I was so flabbergasted by the list of insane shit they had done that I was willing to believe that these crooks where able to do anything and everything, no matter how vile. So far I have not been disappointed. No, not because I am a partisan racist, homophobic, misogynist, gun toting redneck hater, but because of the history that came before where they literally did and got away with some unbelievable things. I can not say this enough: Nixon was run out of office for far less than this administration gotten away with, and by orders of magnitude. And yes, Obama’s legacy will be that people now are likely to believe any conspiracy theory they get told. The sad thing is that too many of them are far closer to the truth than to insane rantings. The media, which thinks it has provided help, has served to only exacerbate things by providing cover instead of investigating this administrations criminal behavior as we now find out about Benghazi.

Thank you libs!

Cruel Separation

Oh no, not another one of these stories:

A Southern California woman was in custody Tuesday after authorities said she drugged her estranged husband, tied him to a bed, cut off his penis and put it through a garbage disposal.

Garden Grove police Lt. Jeff Nightengale said that Catherine Kieu Becker drugged a meal and served it to the victim, whose name was not released, shortly before the attack Monday night.

Nightengale said the 51-year-old man felt sick, went to lie down and lost consciousness. The 48-year-old Becker then tied the victim’s arms and legs to the bed with rope, removed his clothes and attacked him with a 10-inch kitchen knife as he awoke, Nightengale said.

“He was conscious when his penis was removed,” Nightengale said.

Nightengale said Becker put the penis in the garbage disposal and turned it on.

Yeah, I had to Google Lorena Bobbitt for a point of reference. Although the facts of the two cases are dissimilar (apparently) given the target of her aggression, a ready made defense already presents itself.

Other sources reveal that the husband was the one that filed for divorce, so we know he was unhappy.

I have to admit, when I first read this story I figured the wife would probably walk. Lorena convinced the jury that he had it coming because he was so abusive to her in the past, I guess getting out of the marriage was just too damned difficult, cutting off his dick made more sense.

Bail for Becker was set at $1 million after she was booked at the Orange County Jail for investigation of aggravated mayhem, false imprisonment, assault with a deadly weapon, administering a drug with intent to commit a felony, poisoning and spousal abuse.

All easily explained away to a sympathetic jury in that he clearly had it coming. Police records show no prior police contacts and neighbors portray them as a quiet couple. No matter, the chauvinist most have done something to make her snap, cutting off his dick is obviously a sexual cry for help, the provocation must have been so extreme that the fact that she did not kill him outright shows remarkable calm and poise. Women in abusive relationships can’t be held viable for their actions, irresistible impulses happen.

Not guilty, by reason of…………oh,who cares?