Tag: Can we admit that the Obama Administration is a criminal enterprise yet?

Vindicated? Yeah, but they mean well so ignore it…

Well, I was certain that when Obama told everyone he had no clue Hillary was using an illegal server – an act that should have had her wearing an orange jumpsuit and printing license plates while not making sweet love with Big Bertha – back whenever that this was just another one of his many lies that we would never get the skinny on. Turns out I was wrong for a change:

President Barack Obama used a pseudonym in email communications with Hillary Clinton and others, according to FBI records made public Friday.

The disclosure came as the FBI released its second batch of documents from its investigation into Clinton’s private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.

The 189 pages the bureau released includes interviews with some of Clinton’s closest aides, such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills; senior State Department officials; and even Marcel Lazar, better known as the Romanian hacker “Guccifer.”

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

“Once informed that the sender’s name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: ‘How is this not classified?'” the report says. “Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”

The State Department has refused to make public that and other emails Clinton exchanged with Obama. Lawyers have cited the “presidential communications privilege,” a variation of executive privilege, in order to withhold the messages under the Freedom of Information Act.

The report doesn’t provide more details on the contents of that particular email exchange, but says it took place on June 28, 2012, and had the subject line: “Re: Congratulations.” It may refer to the Supreme Court’s ruling that day upholding a key portion of the Obamacare law.

I bet you that like Clinton, the asshole that promised the most transparent administration evah! (anyone remember that promise?), will plead stupidity and expect a pass from the usual morons. I expect the media to give this all a wide birth (covering it like angel of mercy nurses do to their victims with a pillow) or spin it for all it is worth. Their focus will be on Trump saying something un-PC. In the mean time the world finds out that the US is being run by a crime syndicate masquerading as the DNC. But who cares about that? The left means well!

Thomas Sowell deconstructs Obama and the left’s bullshit

I love Thomas Sowell. This man gets economics and the way the real world works. So as soon as I heard he had a new article discussing the stupidity of another Obama “You didn’t build that” and “Pay your fair share you evil capitalists” moment, I had to go check it out. As usual, Thomas Sowell cleans the floor with the stupid shit liberals say> Here’s an excerpt:

In a recent panel discussion on poverty at Georgetown University, President Barack Obama gave another demonstration of his mastery of rhetoric — and disregard of reality.

One of the ways of fighting poverty, he proposed, was to “ask from society’s lottery winners” that they make a “modest investment” in government programs to help the poor.

Since free speech is guaranteed to everyone by the First Amendment to the Constitution, there is nothing to prevent anybody from asking anything from anybody else. But the federal government does not just “ask” for money. It takes the money it wants in taxes, usually before the people who have earned it see their paychecks.

Despite pious rhetoric on the left about “asking” the more fortunate for more money, the government does not “ask” anything. It seizes what it wants by force. If you don’t pay up, it can take not only your paycheck, it can seize your bank account, put a lien on your home and/or put you in federal prison.

So please don’t insult our intelligence by talking piously about “asking.”

And please don’t call the government’s pouring trillions of tax dollars down a bottomless pit “investment.” Remember the soaring words from Barack Obama, in his early days in the White House, about “investing in the industries of the future”? After Solyndra and other companies in which he “invested” the taxpayers’ money went bankrupt, we haven’t heard those soaring words so much.

Then there are those who produced the wealth that politicians want to grab. In Obama’s rhetoric, these producers are called “society’s lottery winners.”

Was Bill Gates a lottery winner? Or did he produce and sell a computer operating system that allows billions of people around the world to use computers, without knowing anything about the inner workings of this complex technology?

Was Henry Ford a lottery winner? Or did he revolutionize the production of automobiles, bringing the price down to the point where cars were no longer luxuries of the rich but vehicles that millions of ordinary people could afford, greatly expanding the scope of their lives?

Most people who want to redistribute wealth don’t want to talk about how that wealth was produced in the first place. They just want “the rich” to pay their undefined “fair share” of taxes. This “fair share” must remain undefined because all it really means is “more.”

Once you have defined it — whether at 30 percent, 60 percent or 90 percent — you wouldn’t be able to come back for more.

Obama goes further than other income redistributionists. “You didn’t build that!” he declared to those who did. Why? Because those who created additions to the world’s wealth used government-built roads or other government-provided services to market their products.

And who paid for those roads and other government-provided services if not the taxpayers? Since all other taxpayers, as well as non-taxpayers, also use government facilities, why are those who created private wealth not to use them also, since they are taxpayers as well?

The fact that most of the rhetorical ploys used by Barack Obama and other redistributionists will not stand up under scrutiny means very little politically. After all, how many people who come out of our schools and colleges today are capable of critical scrutiny?

And that’s the point though, isn’t it? You target envious low information voters with a head full of leftist mush for support to give pretense to robbing the productive, all while stealing tons of that money, under the pretense of helping those less well off. Now if we had anything like a honest media, they would point out how much money these class warriors bag while peddling this liberal nonsense, no matter what the medium chosen to gain acceptance of thing sane people would never go with, while selling the snake oil.

These people want to handle your medical records and decisions

Another congressional hearing, and the IRS rep is again lying through his teeth. If you ask me what the greatest talent of the Obama administration’s members is, I will have to say it is engaging in any kind of criminal activity and then lying about it. These people apparently can’t have one of the organizations that holds the power to destroy every citizen’s life hold on to basic information, yet this agency demands we tax payers be able to produce any information they request or face drastic consequences. That’s not irony, but something far worse.

And as the title of my post points out, these are the kind of people the progressives tell us should not only control the healthcare system, basically holding stewardship of our medical information, but have the power over life and death decisions. Because, you know, evil private corporations make profits. Yeah, and petty partisan bureaucrats with delusions of grandeur and a political agenda won’t abuse their power, like those at the IRS, the DOJ, the EPA, and any other entity you can name under the Obama administration, have been doing causing harm that these private entities would only have dreamed of being able to get away with. Nothing to worry about, people.

I am hoping that the call for the IRS to be abolished actually pan out, just like I hope Americans get a real break and Obamacare gets punted. Collectivism is a cancer on humanity.

That drop in unemployment you heard about from the leftards put into perspective

The left is all atwitter about how unemployment has been dropping, even going so far as to acknowledge that the 7.6% number they tout, comes with abysmally low new job numbers. I actually had one of these idiots show their lack of gall by telling me these numbers prove that the economy was finally responding to all the hard work the marxist have been doing. Shit, it’s a miracle things are not worse considering the all out economy destroying attack from the left in the last 5 plus years. So let me leave you with a graph from The Federalists to give you some perspective.

Those employment numbers for real

Those employment numbers for real

And I think that red line is kind of conservative. Things are far worse than this graph shows. I even have heard some people point out that the Carter years are no longer looking so bad after they take a hard look at the last 5 years of Obama. I will wait to roll out the “I told you so” I should be able to because as I pointed out back in 2007, when the left was pretending they would fix everything, but especially the economy, that the left, when not controlled, like Clinton was by others, only destroys wealth, until a later time when I can rub it in even harder. And that’s because I know things are going to get worse. Far worse. Not just economically, but overall. They are pissing away our rights and freedoms, destroying our healthcare system, crapping all over the future of the next 2 generations, plowing the economy into the ground at a record pace, and in general making the US a banana republic. But hey, they pretend they mean well.

Want to see what a real scandal looks like?

These days the fucking evil and corrupt left and their agents in the LSM are all abuzz about how the fucking traffic in NJ is a huge scandal, while real scandals and absolutely despicable abuses of power, pervasive everywhere and practically in every level of our bloated and collectivist driven federal government, go ignored or passed of as faux scandals. Case in point, another instance of a highly placed leftard hiding the fact the rogue and criminal actions of the EPA, under order from the green lovers (which reaches all the way to the WH) is ignored:

An oil industry analyst says the Environmental Protection Agency colluded with environmental activists to go after a Texas natural gas firm, and the agency’s inspector general whitewashed the issue in its report.

The EPA’s Office of the Inspector General last month cleared former regional administrator Al Armendariz of wrongdoing in the case involving a 2010 emergency order to natural gas firm Range Resources after it found elevated levels of methane and benzene — a carcinogen — in residential water. The EPA later settled with the company.

But oil industry analyst Steve Everley, who works for Energy in Depth, a public education project of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, said the EPA’s watchdog ignored “the evidence that would suggest any wrongdoing on the part of EPA.”

Everley said Armendariz, who resigned in April 2012 under GOP pressure after being quoted as saying he would “crucify” companies that run afoul of environmental laws, colluded with activists on the order against Range Resources.

La-di-da! Another false investigation, where an insider and team blue player is put in charge of finding criminal activity, but of course, finds none, even though it is there, and blatant. Par for the course. So who wants to bet that in this case, they will not just tell us that the IRS did nothing wrong too?

This country has become a banana republic, and one administration is to blame for that. Our DOJ is run by a criminal, as is our WH. The left pretended we were no longer a nation of laws when Boosh was president, but we now have a real criminal in charge of the country, and they can do nothing but make excuses and invent things to distract the stupid sheep that vote for them from the facts. But yeah, the big scandal is that fat idiot from Jersey that pretends he is a conservative, and for which I am glad he will now not run for president in a couple of years, had some people block traffic! Fuck all you liberal scumbags pretending you have a leg to stand on. You are nothing but scumbags. Calling you hypocrites is insulting to hypocrites. If you want to see stupid and evil, look in the fucking mirror.

Next time the libs tell you about how they are going to fix things..

Remember that their quest for equality of income is practically always worse than the alternative. From the article:

Putting aside poverty and immobility, what’s left in the concept of inequality? One simplified way to put it might be: How rich are the rich? In other words, is it a bad thing for a country to have some really rich people? Again, it depends on how they got rich. Sutirtha Bagchi of the University of Michigan’s business school and Jan Svejnar of Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs studied how inequality correlates with economic growth. In general, more inequality meant slower growth, and less inequality meant faster growth. But in many countries, over various time periods, growing inequality had no effect on economic growth. The new study suggests that an increase in inequality hurt the economy when the rich were getting rich through political connections.

If you need proof that the connected profit the best when democrats are in charge, listen to president Obama’s own words:

President Obama is fighting a losing battle against the super rich in this country, and many of his moves have actually made made the super rich the super richer. During a Sunday sit-down on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, the president admitted that the rich have been doing pretty well during his administration, despite his attempts to combat income inequality.

Stephanopoulos cited a Berkeley study which found that 95 percent of income gains from 2009 to 2012 went to the top one percent, which kind of defeats the purpose of the whole wealth redistribution thing. President Obama conceded the point, but insomuch as he admitted that he has been unable to curb the fattened coffers of the super rich, he implied that it’s not his fault.

This happening is neither an unintended consequence nor a coincidence. You have to be a moron not to understand that the lefts push for “social justice” and their “fight against about inequality (of any kind other than between their elite and the serfs)” are really about them choosing who succeeds and who doesn’t. The left has spent decades putting together a system that rewards cronyism and that puts the need to buy favors from the left front and center. In short, “social justice” is nothing but a clever excuse to help them create a world where they can, under the pretext of doing good, control the wealth and funnel it to the right people. In their world there is no room for the middle class or any people, rich or otherwise, that are not part of their tent.

This jibes with what we know about free markets. If people can get rich by providing valuable things at good prices, then society will get more valuable things at good prices—and people across the income spectrum benefit. But if people get rich by pocketing subsidies and using the state to crush competitors, then they gained their wealth at the expense of everyone else.

That’s what made America great once and is sending us down the shitter now. We have not had a free market for a while, and what we have now under Obama is about the most corrupt system this country has ever seen. They enforce the laws willy-nilly, mostly against their political opponents, and have no interest in creating new wealth or in any kind of real justice, but focus exclusively on redistributing wealth and hiding their crimes and ineptitude, with the lions share going to the already well off and then also well connected. Their signature law, the ACA, is nothing but more of that. Our economy is kept on life support through the worst leftists policies ever – QE and money printing, to keep the unavoidable and needed correction to decades of the left’s attempts to force it’s dreams of what reality aught to be, despite the way the real world works, from happening – while they plunder the wealth that exists.

The result is obvious. But we can’t get the supporters of these jackals to even see they are being played, because they are akin to religious fanatics when it comes to their collectivism. It’s a death cult, that’s what it is.

They have an enemies list, and they fuck those that show them up

It looks like yet another person that pointed out how corrupt this administration and the left are in a medium that gave them good visibility is going to get fucked by the scumbags sympathetic to the crooks in charge. It is time for the IRS to go. We have a DOJ that’s not more honorable or clean than your average mafia outfit and the most powerful institution in America, the IRS, fucking over anyone the bureaucrats in charge feel threatened about. Of course the marxist will tell you they are doing it all for our good. Stalin and Mao murdered millions for their own good too…

“Pour encourager les autres!”

That’s frog for “To set an example for the others“, and that’s precisely why this WH will never, ever, give Snowden any form of clemency. In fact, if they ever do, Snowden is advised to decline, albeit politely, under the expectation that they are lying to him so they can get him, and then, they will punish him. Nobody lies as often and with such aplomb as the members of this “The most ethical administration, EVAH!” do.

Even the left, and Slate is left leaning, if anything, admits that this administration punishes those that blow the whistle at their abuses. And they knew this was the case long before the Snowden incident as the date of that Slate article clearly shows. Get in their way and they will use every means and agency of the government to bury you. Snowden will have to wait until someone else is in charge to have a chance at a pardon for doing the American people a service.

Another piece of the puzzle..

The other day I was talking to someone that was pointing out to me they were worried about this administration’s control over the military and considering the tyrannical and criminal nature of this administration, what it could mean for us all. I dismissed her concerns and told her that these fucks couldn’t command the loyalty of a hungry dog if they were wearing a hotdog suit, and that the military would never side with them if they chose to escalate their abuses even more. I might have been a bit premature in my dismissal though, because a little digging got me to see that this administration has been very effective at purging those that that showed any sign of not going along with their criminal shit.

Obama’s administration is basically doing, for real, all the criminal and tyrannical progtards things the used to pretend GWB’s administration did, and they are doing it on steroids. The Soviets and communist Chinese had purges like this of their military. At least they are not executing the people they are purging like the old guard used to, but they are just as effective in undermining the possibility that if they wanted to turn the troops on the American people the military leadership wouldn’t just go along. These people are above the law, and they view us as serfs. They are actively destroying our economy and country and straddling our future generations with an enormous burden, and we are now finding out how bad they are screwing us. And they are exerting enormous pressure to keep the truth from coming out.

Yeah, maybe my friend was right because this news about that military purge is something to worry about.

This allegation better turn out to be bullshit, or else…

The Weekly Standard has this insane post claiming that “Congressman Frank Wolf, a Republican from Virginia, said today on the House floor that survivors of the Benghazi terror attack have been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements“. WTF? They, meaning the Hillary Clinton State Department, the Holder DOJ, Big Sis’s former DHS, the Obama WH, or a combination of any of these, made survivors of Benghazi sign NDAs? More information;

“According to trusted sources that have contacted my office, many if not all of the survivors of the Benghazi attacks along with others at the Department of Defense, the CIA have been asked or directed to sign additional non-disclosure agreements about their involvement in the Benghazi attacks. Some of these new NDAs, as they call them, I have been told were signed as recently as this summer.”

Wolf continued: “It is worth nothing that the Marine Corps Times yesterday reported that the Marine colonel whose task force was responsible for special operations in northern and western Africa at the time of the attack is still on active duty despite claims that he retired. And therefore could not be forced to testify before Congress.

This whole thing reeks of corruption and vileness, and yet, the LSM can’t be bothered. Look, I am not gonna rehash the whole despicable thing. All I will do is ask if anyone here doubts that the LSM would have crucified and forced the resignation or impeachment of the occupant of the WH if that person had a (R) next to their name for you to understand how criminally negligent they are about pursuing this story.

This stuff is frightening to me. Why the need for secrecy? What were they doing that they expect will cause so much trouble for them? And please spare me the national security angle. These fucks have divulged real intel that put people’s lives at risk and compromised national security at the drop of a hat, on numerous occasions, before, whenever it benefited them politically. In fact, they do or don’t do things solely based on political consequences. So whatever they need to keep secret about Benghazi is political. And a complicit media is helping them hide the fact they allowed an ambassador and 3 others to be murdered, and act of war, to cover up whatever it was they felt would hurt them politically. These people are beyond vile, I tell you.