Tag: Benghazi coverup by the LSM

I think I figured out…

The differed between a dangerous and stupid cowboy-esque president, like, say GWB, and any much more enlightened man-of-the-world Nobel Peace prize holders, like, say Obama, and it was not that hard. All it took was the recent Bergdahl incident and things like this. And you know what it is? The leftist love the process and pretense of following the law. Yes, I said “pretense of following the law”, and I meant it.

This whole ordeal smacks of Holder’s promise that if the rubes in congress where but to allow the Gitmo inmates to be tried in civilian court, they all would end up with guilty verdicts and life in prison. You only make such promises if you have a kangaroo court proceeding with a predetermined outcome. Then again, I could be mistaken and unjustly accusing Holder of presiding over a DOJ that enforces the law willy-nilly, considering the guy is such an expert liar that everything he says should be taken as possibly some sort of word play on the truth. Who knows. When you deal with people that believe their moral conviction puts them and those like them above the law, anything goes.

I expect this WH to tout this as a great success – they need a new diversion from the previous chain of diversions they tried subsequently to use as people found out how bad they were behaving and each went sour – but I also expect it to blow up in their face. These idiots are desperate to keep their criminal activities under wrap, which is why we keep getting story after story to move people along from one scandalous revelation to another. I guess the plan is to cause scandal fatigue or something.

Anyway, you ask how in the world I think this can go wrong? After all, they are going to have a pretend court hearing and the guy is being held by Obama, which means that he will not be tortured or held indefinitely like evil Boosh di. In fact, I see a future trade for another deserter cum enemy sympathizer in his future. That is, if this dude can be kept from spilling the beans about what really went on at Benghazi. Maybe we should give Holder what he once wanted, and have this guy transferred from military jurisdiction to civilian court. At least it would be somewhat easier for us to get the facts from the alternative media (the LSM would not dream of giving us the truth of what happened if it hurts demcorats as we all suspect it will turn out to be the case).

Abu Khattala, who was captured Sunday on the outskirts of Benghazi by U.S. special operations forces, was headed to the United States to face what President Obama called “the full weight of the American justice system.”

The Benghazi attacks, and the Obama administration’s conduct in the aftermath, have long been a source of festering political discord. And some Republicans on Capitol Hill were quick to voice skepticism about the administration’s plans to try Abu Khattala like a civilian.

What are the chances this guy just happens to choke on his hallal falafel and never gets to tell us what happened, huh? After all, they don’t want to send these guys to Gitmo anymore. I bet there is a prisoner swap in the work soon. Maybe for Jane Fonda. We should get her back from Hanoi.

Battlespace preparations: Billary is a hawk!

So, Time magazine has some fluff piece where they desperately are trying to make Hillary look like a bad ass, both a military genius and reserved statesmen, and it is blatantly obvious:

Midway through Barack Obama’s first term as president, U.S. officials grew alarmed that Israel might launch a unilateral air strike against Iran’s nuclear program. Iran had snubbed Obama’s outreach after the 2008 election, and rejected an October 2009 international proposal to ship most of its enriched uranium out of the country—stirring pessimism about prospects for a future breakthrough.

“Militarily, I thought we needed to prepare for a possible Israeli attack and Iranian retaliation,” former Defense Secretary Robert Gates writes in his new memoir, Duty. At a January 2010 Oval Office meeting, Gates told Obama “he needed to consider the ramifications of a no-warning Israeli attack,” including whether the U.S. would assist Israel and how it would respond to Iranian retaliation.

Around the same time, senior officials met to discuss ways the U.S. might dissuade Israeli Prime Minister from taking unilateral action. In one such meeting, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton raised a bracing question, according to two former Obama administration officials: Was it possible that, instead of trying to restrain Israel, the U.S. should instead provide what one of those official described as “a tacit green light to the Israelis to take care of the problem for us”? In other words, instead of begging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to give diplomacy more time, perhaps it was worth telling him to go proceed with airstrikes.

Get that? Time is desperately trying to make it look that while Obama’s people, all desperately looking for a peaceful solution, because we all know that peace must happen at all costs, Hillary was the only one with the brains and balls to think about the obvious alternative! What a show of genius and strength. She is a true friend of Israel. However, just to make sure nobody can accuse her of being a warmonger, lets add this:

Clinton did not actually endorse the idea. She only raised the notion “as one option to consider,” according to one former official, who adds that it gained no traction inside the administration. Clinton’s current press secretary, Nick Merrill, did not respond to requests for comment this week on this matter.

Double genius! She has her cake and eats it too! Our first female president-to-be was just thinking outside the box. Straddle both sides of that fence. Only problem I have with this narrative is that it smells of massive bullshit, and I am willing to bet money it is made up shit.

No, not just because she is a democrat, but because she already was caught lying, at least twice. First up was here ludicrous story about being fired on by a sniper in Bosnia, a revelation that turned out to be a blatant falsehood. Such a lie should have ended this woman’s career, but because she is a progtard, it actually enhanced it. She then ran for president. I remind you that it was her campaign that started both the rumors about Obama not being a US citizen and that he was associated with radicals, be they muslims or just creeps like reverend White. Of course these days most people forget or ignore these facts and pretend it was the other side that did this. They are after all racists, misogynists, homophobic, sexist, poor robbing, evil conservatives. Billary lost out to Obama, and in a wise move, to keep her from stabbing him in the back, Obama made her Sec State. That’s where the my exhibit B comes from: Benghazi-gate. This is the shit I associate with Hillary Clinton: made up crap and epic failures that cost lives and lead to more made up crap.

So spare me the bullshit propaganda that Hillary is such a genius, a friend of Israel, and a peacenik all wrapped in one, because you have a better chance of making an argument she is the tooth fairy, than that one. When it comes to Iran, or any other such national security issue, Hillary will be just a bad as Obama, if not worse.

This allegation better turn out to be bullshit, or else…

The Weekly Standard has this insane post claiming that “Congressman Frank Wolf, a Republican from Virginia, said today on the House floor that survivors of the Benghazi terror attack have been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements“. WTF? They, meaning the Hillary Clinton State Department, the Holder DOJ, Big Sis’s former DHS, the Obama WH, or a combination of any of these, made survivors of Benghazi sign NDAs? More information;

“According to trusted sources that have contacted my office, many if not all of the survivors of the Benghazi attacks along with others at the Department of Defense, the CIA have been asked or directed to sign additional non-disclosure agreements about their involvement in the Benghazi attacks. Some of these new NDAs, as they call them, I have been told were signed as recently as this summer.”

Wolf continued: “It is worth nothing that the Marine Corps Times yesterday reported that the Marine colonel whose task force was responsible for special operations in northern and western Africa at the time of the attack is still on active duty despite claims that he retired. And therefore could not be forced to testify before Congress.

This whole thing reeks of corruption and vileness, and yet, the LSM can’t be bothered. Look, I am not gonna rehash the whole despicable thing. All I will do is ask if anyone here doubts that the LSM would have crucified and forced the resignation or impeachment of the occupant of the WH if that person had a (R) next to their name for you to understand how criminally negligent they are about pursuing this story.

This stuff is frightening to me. Why the need for secrecy? What were they doing that they expect will cause so much trouble for them? And please spare me the national security angle. These fucks have divulged real intel that put people’s lives at risk and compromised national security at the drop of a hat, on numerous occasions, before, whenever it benefited them politically. In fact, they do or don’t do things solely based on political consequences. So whatever they need to keep secret about Benghazi is political. And a complicit media is helping them hide the fact they allowed an ambassador and 3 others to be murdered, and act of war, to cover up whatever it was they felt would hurt them politically. These people are beyond vile, I tell you.

I am sure that it is the conspiracy theorist in me.. (UPDATED)

That makes me feel that there definitely was an orchestrated high level cover-up operation, led from the WH of all places, which included the usual willing leftard sheeple in the LSM, to help them hide the disastrous happenings in Benghazi, and when we hear how the WH is actively threatening anyone with dire consequences should they choose to ignore that WH directive to keep quiet, it is all bunk. What the hey! These crooks currently running the country would never do anything like that. Can’t be true.

Victoria Toensing, a former Justice Department official and Republican counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee, is now representing one of the State Department employees. She told Fox News her client and some of the others, who consider themselves whistle-blowers, have been threatened by unnamed Obama administration officials.

“I’m not talking generally, I’m talking specifically about Benghazi – that people have been threatened,” Toensing said in an interview Monday. “And not just the State Department. People have been threatened at the CIA.”

Toensing declined to name her client. She also refused to say whether the individual was on the ground in Benghazi on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when terrorist attacks on two U.S. installations in the Libyan city killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.

However, Toensing disclosed that her client has pertinent information on all three time periods investigators consider relevant to the attacks: the months that led up to the attack, when pleas by the ambassador and his staff for enhanced security in Benghazi were mostly rejected by senior officers at the State Department; the eight-hour time frame in which the attacks unfolded, and the eight-day period that followed the attacks, when Obama administration officials incorrectly described them as the result of a spontaneous protest over a video.

“It’s frightening, and they’re doing some very despicable threats to people,” she said. “Not ‘we’re going to kill you,’ or not ‘we’re going to prosecute you tomorrow,’ but they’re taking career people and making them well aware that their careers will be over [if they cooperate with congressional investigators].”

Yeah, well we were pointing out that the WH strategy from the start, and remember this happened close enough to the 2012 election that had the facts come out it would have mattered, was to silence anyone that had the facts. Even Snopes, which does its best to provide the scumbags in the WH with cover on this story, admits that they do not know why either theater commander was relieved, based on more cover-up from Panetta. Panetta had a vested interest in covering for this administration. But I digress.

The fact remains that the scumbags in the WH have been working overtime to keep the truth about Benghazi, regardless of if you believe it is trivial shit or actually horribly damning information about clandestine operations – operations that are far worse than any that the current administration and its party spend years excoriating the previous one about – like I suspect is the case, under wraps. That the people being called up by congress to testify are being threatened to “shut up, or else”, is exactly more of what I expected from these craven and despicable scumbags. They are trying to both provide the current “Community Organizer in Chief” and the candidate they hope follows him in 2016, Mrs. Rodham-Clinton, with cover from a botched incident that resulted in a US ambassador’s assassination.

I have a suspicion that once we do get the facts everyone that provided cover for them will pretend they didn’t do anything of the sort. Kind of like everyone on the left pretends these days that they were on Reagan’s side during the Cold War, and that they think he was courageous for standing up to the “Evil Empire”. Of course, those of us that lived through that period remember clearly how the left actively undermined any and all attempts to halt the evil red machine’s global attempts to spread the cancer of communism, making the US, and especially Reagan, the bad guy. I point out that we got a rear glimpse of their true feelings when the left’s mask and lies about how they were on the side against the “Evil Empire” was recently dropped when they put Thatcher to rest.

There is some serious rot here behind the Benghazi cover-up, but of course, the usual suspects will dismiss it as nothing but speculation, the facts be damned. Where there is smoke, there is fire.

UPDATE: If you had any doubt the WH was lying check this out:

A special operations member who witnessed the attack on the U.S. Mission unfold in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 last year, as well as debriefed those who took part in the response, spoke with Fox News’ Adam Housley on Monday night and revealed information that directly contradicts the administration’s insistence that there was not enough time nor resources to send to Benghazi to help State Department employees, contractors, and intel operatives who were under a terrorist attack. FNC kept their source’s identity hidden, as witnesses to the Benghazi attack have reportedly been intimidated by the administration into silence. The assault left four Americans dead, including U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens.

“I know for a fact that C110 was doing a training exercise not in the region of northern Africa but in Europe and they have the ability to react and respond,” the special ops member told FNC.

This operator was not the only one to make this case. Several other people have argued that help was available and that the commanders were sacked to keep them from testifying to that being the case. I am going out on a limb and betting the operation in Libya was something the WH was so desperate to keep under wraps that it blocked any help from going there so there would be no witnesses. Just look at the other shit they have done for proof these scumbags would allow others to die or try to profit from tragedy every given time.

If it was not for evil Fox News the LSM wouldn’t have to bother..

Looks like at least one of the leftists has the guts to call out the LSM o giving cover to Team Blue and the black Jesus on the whole drone striking and Benghazi fiasco. Author, lecturer, and human rights activist Brigitte Gabriel today while being interviewed of all places on Fox News, since the LSM is conspiring to keep the story buried, discussed the hypocrisy of the Democrat-media complex in regard to the Obama drone policies. She mentioned that the number of US drone strikes have tripled during the Obama years and that the same losers that screamed bloody murder when it was being used under Boosh, now are silentI loved her comment about how liberals gutted Boosh for water boarding a handful of murdering al-Qaeda scumbags, but now are mostly silent to Obama’s drone policy. Watch the video.

The facts are coming out. Obama dropped the ball on this and was not present according to the Pannetta hearing. As an old military saying goes: follow the 8 steps of leadership command to success. Obama seems to only do the first 7 of them, and after issuing orders, simply doesn’t pay attention to make sure they are followed I am being told. What can you expect from a guy whose biggest accomplishments have been community organizing and campaigning for 7 years straight.