Freedom of Press is limited to those who own one - H.L. Mencken
This is depressing:
A new poll released Thursday (Sept. 11) finds that nearly six in 10 white Southern evangelicals believe torture is justified, but their views can shift when they consider the Christian principle of the golden rule.
The poll, commissioned by Faith in Public Life and Mercer University, found that 57 percent of respondents said torture can be often or sometimes justified to gain important information from suspected terrorists. Thirty-eight percent said it was never or rarely justified.
But when asked if they agree that “the U.S. government should not use methods against our enemies that we would not want used on American soldiers,” the percentage who said torture was rarely or never justified rose to 52 percent.
This boggles the mind. Sullivan links it to the legacy of slavery, but that’s problematic. Most pre-war southerners did not own slaves and many of the South’s current inhabitants moved there well after the war. I don’t think torture arises from slavery, but rather both arise from the same principle of dehumanization. If you believe that your faith will get you into heaven while everyone else’s lack thereof is sending them to hell, you have made unbelievers less than human. Any religion that posits its follower to be superior has condoned horror—the ancient Jews in Midian, the medieval Catholics during the Inquisition or fundamentalist Muslims today.
But it’s because of this pro-torture base that we find the following [PDF]:
Support for the unequivocal position [a ban on torture] was highest in Spain (82%), Great Britain (82%) and France (82%), followed by Mexico (73%), China (66%), the Palestinian territories (66%), Poland (62%), Indonesia (61%), and the Ukraine (59%). In five countries either modest majorities or pluralities support a ban on all torture: Azerbaijan (54%), Egypt (54%), the United States (53%), Russia (49%), and Iran (43%). South Koreans are divided.
Yeah, I know. Who wants to be like those idiot Europeans? Much better to be like those forward-thinking Egyptians.
Update: I wanted to add something. If the evangelical ministers of this country—those with thousands or millions of followers—were to issue a statement that torture, in any form, is categorically opposed to teaching of Christ (which it is), the torture debate would be over. Both parties would have no choice but to reaffirm our commitment to opposing torture. Moreover, it would shift the numbers above by at least double digits. That they have not—with a few notable exceptions—is a travesty.
Posted by
Hal_10000 on 09/15/08 at 07:46 AM (
Discuss this in the forums)
Comments
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
<< Back to main
Since the point of torture is actually torture, not gathering information, I think the root of the problem is that criminals aren’t seen to be appropriately punished in modern society.
Get a good lawyer, and get away with murder, or perhaps just pay a fine or get probation. This sort of thing strikes the average person as very wrong, so they want to make up for it by punishing the next offender excessively.
Your average evangelical is much less likely to be the person that believes in the modern version of justice, so these are the very people that will support the extreme position.