Right Thinking From The Left Coast
Adventure is worthwhile - Aesop

The War On Bugs

I know they get bored in Congress, but please.

In mid-May, Rep. George Butterfield [D-NC] introduced H.R. 6068, the Don’t Let the Bed Bugs Bite Act of 2008, in an effort to combat the growing problems of bed bugs in the U.S. The bill would create a grant program in the Department of Commerce and authorize $50,000,000 in each of fiscal years 2009 through 2012 for giving these grants to states to combat bed bugs.
....

The bi-partisan bill, cosponsored by Donald Young (R-Alaska), Donald Payne (D-N.J.), William Jefferson (D-La.) and Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) is a response to America’s bed bug reinfestation and the creepy factor that’s associated with the blood-thirsty critters.

Why are these little critters such a problem?

Nearly destroyed fifty years ago by DDT, bed bugs have made a resurgence in the U.S. since the pesticide was widely banned throughout much of the world.

Call me crazy, but that might have had something to do with it.


Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 07/07/08 at 04:07 PM (Discuss this in the forums)

Comments


Posted by on 07/07/08 at 08:43 PM from Japan

I wondered when this little gem would resurface:

Nearly destroyed fifty years ago by DDT, bed bugs have made a resurgence in the U.S. since the pesticide was widely banned throughout much of the world.

DDT is still in use in some countries, but can only be used sparingly because it has a half-life of up to 15 years, and provokes resistant immunity in bugs at a fairly high rate compared to alternatives. The way people were spraying it around before the ban, it would have been less than useless by now.

Oh and Rachel Carson = Hitler

Posted by on 07/07/08 at 10:42 PM from United States

Further proof that greens are not to be trusted at all....

Posted by Ed Kline on 07/08/08 at 12:11 AM from United States

$50,000,000 in each of fiscal years 2009 through 2012 for giving these grants to states to combat bed bugs.

We really ought to put these people in congress in jail more often. Sadly shooting them seems out of the question.

Posted by on 07/08/08 at 06:27 AM from United States

provokes resistant immunity in bugs at a fairly high rate compared to alternatives.

Got a source for this?  I’ve heard a lot of reasons why DDT might be bad, but this is the first time for this one.

Posted by on 07/08/08 at 06:47 AM from United States

Bed bugs?  Is this a joke?

Posted by on 07/08/08 at 01:05 PM from United States

Retluocc1:

I’ll see if I can track down a source, I’ve recently read a few articles on the subject for a history class I took, but it’s not a difficult concept to understand in theory.  I’m not sure that DDT causes any more resistance than the alternatives, but I’m certain that reistance to DDT quickly became a problem in places where it was sprayed.

Some percentage of the insects targeted by DDT have an immunity to DDT.  The insects that aren’t immune gradually get wiped out, leaving only the immune insects to reproduce.  Those insects reproduce with other immune insects, and now all of the sudden you’ve got a large population of insects that you can’t kill.  It’s the same thing that happens with strains of bacteria that become resistant to antibiotics, it’s why doctors aren’t supposed to hand out antibiotics any time someone comes through the door. 

I’m in no way, shape, or form a “greenie”, but I do think the overuse of pesticides during the 1950s, 1950s and 1960s was especially wrong-headed.  When used in a targeted manner it’s totally reasonable, people were waging a “War on Insects” during the period that was completely loopy.  Take a look at this Time article from 1945:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,792366,00.html

They coated the entirety of Mackinac Island with DDT!  We understand a lot more about how species interact now than we did in 1945, the reason why I don’t trust the environmentalists is that I think in their hearts they still believe it’s 1945.

Posted by on 07/08/08 at 01:30 PM from United States

Continued pesticide exposure has an extremely high correlation with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, which is why Nebraska is pretty much considered a cancer cluster all by itself…

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Silent Scream

Previous entry: Tofu What Now?

<< Back to main