Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed. - George Burns
Several bloggers today made oblique references to Scott Richter—a Palin associate—trying to get his divorce papers sealed. I wondered what they were getting at. Here you go:
So why did an associate of Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s husband file an emergency court motion Wednesday to seal all the documents in his divorce case? As followers of the Palin feeding frenzy know, the National Enquirer this week reported the “incredible allegation” that Palin had an extramarital affair with an unnamed former “business partner” of her husband. Once the politician’s husband Todd learned of the purported affair, an Enquirer source claimed, he “quickly dissolved his friendship and his business associations with the guy.” So when the blogosphere discovered today (via an online court docket) that Scott Richter, a Palin associate, personally filed a sealing motion in Alaska Superior Court, well, conclusions were jumped to. Was Sarah Palin named as the other woman in a messy divorce action? Well, since Richter’s September 3 motion, a copy of which you’ll find below, was denied yesterday, his divorce filings remain open to the public. And a TSG review of the 98-page file shows that the Palins are only mentioned in Richter’s sealing request. According to the filing, Richter wanted the documents deemed confidential in a bid to cloak details about his home, workplace, and phone numbers because “reporters and news agencies” were using that information to contact him. Richter, a 39-year-old contractor, noted that he is “friends and land owners in a remote cabin” with the Palins and, as a result, journalists were intruding on the “cabin life and private life” of him and his 11-year-old son. The petition to dissolve the marriage was filed jointly last July by Richter and his ex-wife, who were not represented by lawyers. A judge granted the dissolution less than two months after the couple filed to end their marriage.
At some point during my reading of this, I passed the point of anger and started to laugh. The media and the blogosphere have gotten so desperate at their rage at McCain for not picking Lieberman that they’ve been reduced to a gossipy sewing circle. “Did you hear about Richter?” “He sealed his divorce papers!” “Tsk-tsk-tsk. You know that Sarah Palin is awfully pretty.” “Too pretty.” “I feel sorry for those children.” “Roll me a joint.”
Are we done here? Are we finished? Is it over yet? In the past week we’ve had hysterical stories about Trig’s maternity, bizarre stories about the AIP and ludicrous stories about Scott Richter. All because John McCain picked a Vice-President that wasn’t on the anyone’s radar. And into that vacuum, they are throwing a bunch of crap.
Look, maybe she did have an affair. Maybe there is something to troopergate. But I’ll wait until there’s some ... you know ... fact before I demand that McCain dump her from the ticket.
Posted by
Hal_10000 on 09/05/08 at 05:44 PM (
Discuss this in the forums)
Comments
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
<< Back to main
Notice that there is no legal definition of “affair”. That is why National Enquirer uses the term “affair” instead of SEX. Me posting a comment on a blog is an “affair”, using the dictionary definition.
On Tazergate.. read Sarah Palin’s (long) email that is the center of this - it is amazingly reasonable and quoted entirely out of context in the articles I’ve seen. The version I read had her phone numbers and email addresses in it, and has been deleted.
The success of blog yellow journalism and the widespread death of hardcopy newspapers is kind of frightening.