"To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing,
if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?"
-- Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 1803
Napoleon once said that he would prefer to have one lucky general instead of two clever ones. He considered luck to be one’s ability to exploit accidents. Considering that, I would rather be lucky than just good.
Posted by on 03/27/08 at 09:00 PM from
Totally. Luck trumps talent over and over. Talent is in it’s basement while luck finds the hundred dollar bill.
A lucky person can sieze an opportunity and run with it. A good person, no matter how smart they may be, is often an idea person at their best, not necessarily a person of action.
Is Phil Hellmuth really that much of a dick, or does he just play it up for television?
Dont know him personally, but his reputation outside of the poker table ( especially on tv), is that he is a great guy and very easy going. He is also in my opinion the greatest hold-em player ever.
Posted by on 03/28/08 at 08:01 AM from
When you are good you don’t need luck.
Luck is fickle....
Posted by on 03/28/08 at 09:06 AM from
Did you see Match Point recently? That movie makes a good case for luck.
Posted by on 03/28/08 at 11:28 AM from
Being good is something you have some control over. Luck, not so much.
Nobody is really in control of their lives, when you get down to it.
Posted by on 03/28/08 at 05:12 PM from
Did you see Match Point recently? That movie makes a good case for luck.
Napoleon once said that he would prefer to have one lucky general instead of two clever ones. He considered luck to be one’s ability to exploit accidents. Considering that, I would rather be lucky than just good.