"To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing,
if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?"
-- Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 1803
I have a confession: I’m not terribly interested in these calls to boycott the China games or protest the torch. Especially that torch thing. Jesus, how self-important do you have to be to think that mobbing a stupid God-damned torch is going to accomplish anything? (Answer: stupid enough to be liberal. Libs always think they’ve accomplished something by making a pointless gesture. We’ve had our protest; time for lattes!)
Maybe it’s my childhood. When I was eight years old, History’s Greatest Monster boycotted the Moscow Olympics. I remember very little about it other than being disappointed. I was just getting into sports and wanted to see Americans compete. As I’ve gotten older, the decision looks more and more pointless. What exactly was accomplished? I mean, I know the Berlin Wall fell only nine years later. But as far as I could tell, all it really did was deprive a lot of dedicated athletes of their rare moment in the sun.
On the other hand, maybe it’s my discomfort with the whole Gyatso Fetish that permeates certain leftist circles. If China were just an oppressive communist state, I’m certain all of the protesters would be at home, battling poverty by blogging about Hillary Clinton. But throw a cute religious leader in and they’ll work up the nerve to go all the way down the corner to shout at some guy with a torch.
Anyway, post your thoughts on the subject in the comments. I’m open to arguments that we should boycott the games or turn fire extinguishers on the torch relay. I just don’t see it right now.
Update: Lee has a great post on the subject over at Lee in China, one of a number of really good posts on the boycott subject.
Posted by
Hal_10000 on 04/09/08 at 07:46 PM (
Discuss this in the forums)
Comments
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
<< Back to main
One would assume this would primarily be a right-wing issue (it is in some quarters, but not by much). I suspect this is being driven by the likes of Nancy Pelosi as a way to embarress Bush into not going, and for the Dems to show their protectionist credentials.
Either way, while I would like to see a free and independent Tibet, I don’t think the Olympics is necessarily the venue for this to be an issue. The best way to focus attention is to keep up the media heat on China through the coverage that Tibet has already gotten.