Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed. - George Burns

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Miss him yet?

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Tonight President Obama is scheduled to deliver a speech about the whole Iraq situation. Frankly I am intrigued at how the morons in the WH will try to play this. It seems all bad things they inherited from Bush, but this victory that clearly came from the efforts of our troops that these same grandstanding demcorats put in harms way with their actions and words, and the conviction of President Bush to fight it despite the fact that the opposition was trying to hand our troops another Vietnam-like loss - if you believe the talking heads that are predicting this - that the WH is going to claim is theirs. I doubt Obama will give credit to Bush for this, because that’s not his way. If he does, he will somewhere in there take it back and blame Bush. Maybe by indirectly brining up the liberal meme that Bush faked the intel, red meat for the morons that buy this crap, or some such other nonsense. I certainly hope he credits the troops. And of course he will play to his left wing moonbats and claim he is keeping his promise. The problem is that it will be all show, and we won despite of him and his party, while there is still a risk that we might be pulling out too soon.

The fact is that Obama was part & parcel of the donkey lineup that made the claim back when Bush’s team announced they would pursue the surge option, that it was going to fail. I do give him credit for not declaring it a failure before it happened like Reed did, or for slandering our troops or taking other actions to help the enemy’s cause like Murtha and other demcorats did, but Obama was one of the people that tried - real hard - to derail any and all efforts intended to support our troops and give them what they needed to win in Iraq. Obama made it a point during his campaigning – I mean before the election, not the continued campaigning they are doing almost 2 years after taking the WH and that is making everyone stop wondering if these morons know anything else – to say Iraq was still a failure, and that unless he was elected to fix it by pulling out the troops, things would get even worse. In short, this guy, while not going as far as many in his party have, was if not outright rooting for us to lose in Iraq, at least vested in making our efforts in Iraq look & go bad, for political and personal gain. And the troops at least seem to know that. Of course, I doubt the Lame Stream Media will bring any of that up.

Even more interesting, as I already pointed out, is the fact that most believe that Obama is about to likely claim he kept his campaign promise and that this withdrawal is due his work, when there is no doubt for anyone willing to do the leg work that the pullout going on right now was following Bush’s team’s withdrawal time table, set a long time ago, and the only contribution from the Obama team was that they didn’t fuck it all up in Iraq and pull defeat right out of the jaws of victory before now, as many of us suspected they would. My guess is that the LSM would go right along and hand him that credit. After all, he is their guy, and he desperately needs to be propped up, because the mood of the American people after seeing Obama & the progressive left in action these past 2 years is dour indeed, and November promises a massacre at the polls for the left.

Then you have the fact that Obama now is ramping up the fighting in Afghanistan, which promises to be a difficult and costly slugfest. I wonder if he and his team realize now why Bush’s team moved the fight to Iraq back in 2003. And this whole endeavor seems to be mired in doubt, what with all the talk of a fixed withdrawal table and all, despite the fact he has put General Petraeus whom immediately opted to go on the offensive and actually do some killin’ – hear much about that in the LSM these days? No stories of US troops murdering babies either, huh? - in charge of that operation as well. And then there is of course Iran, which I still feel Bush made a mistake not to deal with at the same time as they took on Iraq.

Say what you want, but tonight’s speech should be interesting. At least it should provide people with a lot to waste time on. Me, I bet it will be a lot of nothing, Obama grandstanding and campaigning, taking credit for other people’s work, blaming Bush as usual for his mistakes, and then the fawning LSM telling us how lucky we are to have this guy in charge. I sure hope I am wrong.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

The usual Lame Stream Media propagandists must be desperate to try and defend the close to $1 trillion dollar stimulus patronage bill known as the “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” as this desperate and transparently vain attempt by Time tries to make this pig pretty proves.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 — President Obama’s $787 billion stimulus — has been marketed as a jobs bill, and that’s how it’s been judged. The White House says it has saved or created about 3 million jobs, helping avoid a depression and end a recession. Republicans mock it as a Big Government boondoggle that has failed to prevent rampant unemployment despite a massive expansion of the deficit. Liberals complain that it wasn’t massive enough.

Monday, August 23, 2010

I just got back from a week of vacation where I played US government - I spent way too much money on feel good stuff that yield no actual benefits - and am now because of the time off, busier than a one legged man at an arse kicking contest now at work. But I felt I had to address something that came up during a conversation I had, with a bunch of obvious liberal morons defending the disastrous collectivist policies of the last decade that have reached new limits under demcorat and Obama control, when they blamed Bush and the Iraqi war for anything from $3-$5 trillion in deficits spending. The numbers widely varied apparently even for them, but I was stumped as to why they would be pulling these ridiculous numbers up until I realized the left still wants to make believe that the deficit spending is because of the Iraq wars and defense spending, and not because of the massive growth in wasteful collectivist spending by government. 

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

That $26.1 billion payout by congress which contained a hefty $10 billion to help pay off the help of the teachers unions on behalf of demcorats right before the 2010 mid-term elections, has now come under fire, because some $12.1 billion of that money is coming from a cut in the food-stamp program. So the donkeys, because they know they need to hide their out of control spending, have literally screwed over the little people - some 41 million Americans are on this program if you believe the story - in order to pay of one of their super special interest groups. Of course, republicans are the evil ones, because according to the Lame Stream Media, they are the only ones for sale and demcorats are the party of the little people.

Heh, how are the little people feeling now that they are going to get less aid so the demcorats can pay off a political debt? How do the idiots that continue to pretend that the demcorats are the party of the little people feel, as we keep finding out more and more stories like this - not because of the Lame Stream Media for sure, I should add - and clearly see the collectivist demcorats are far, far worse than anything they have accused the other side of being? How does that saying about friends like these making enemies unnecessary go again? Party of the little people, indeed.

Monday, August 09, 2010

The GOP for his woes! Sure, Charlie. It wasn’t you know, the fact that you are a crook that has you in hot water, it was them evil republicans and their lack of support in cutting you a deal. I guess Rangel is at least smart enough to know Bush is gone, and blaming him wouldn’t fly well. So instead of blaming Bush he went for the next best thing: the GOP. Maybe he forgot that there was video to disprove his bullshit? I was fine until the evil right got me in trouble! Dang, you can’t make this stuff up.

The again, in the day and age where the Lame Stream Media is busy trying to convince us that their lame horse isn’t the first one, as even the Feds can’t lie about the effects of Obamanomics anymore, while our elite party like it was 1999, this should not come as a surprise. Heck, we even have desperate demcorats trying to rig the November elections by putting up faux Tea Party candidates to siphon votes from their oppositions. That bloodbath sure is looking like it will be fun.

My guess is Charlie is just setting up the stage so he can then still run in November, win that election because his district likes that he is a scumbag, and then hand that seat over to demcorats when he just plain resigns. After all, if he was to deal with that now, the democrats would have to worry about losing even that seat. These crooks - and by crooks I mean demcorats - do play for keeps, though. Maxine Waters, another legally challenged demcorat, was unavailable for comment. We are in great hands people. Hope & Change! I bet these elitists hate the fact they even have to put up the charade.

Thursday, August 05, 2010

You hear about stuff like this. I mean, this is for now a rumor, but the scary thing is that I have no problem believing these collectivist opportunist would resort to something like this to keep power:

Main Street may be about to get its own gigantic bailout. Rumors are running wild from Washington to Wall Street that the Obama administration is about to order government-controlled lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to forgive a portion of the mortgage debt of millions of Americans who owe more than what their homes are worth. An estimated 15 million U.S. mortgages – one in five – are underwater with negative equity of some $800 billion. Recall that on Christmas Eve 2009, the Treasury Department waived a $400 billion limit on financial assistance to Fannie and Freddie, pledging unlimited help. The actual vehicle for the bailout could be the Bush-era Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, a sister program to Obama’s loan modification effort. HARP was just extended through June 30, 2011.

The move, if it happens, would be a stunning political and economic bombshell less than 100 days before a midterm election in which Democrats are currently expected to suffer massive, if not historic losses. The key date to watch is August 17 when the Treasury Department holds a much-hyped meeting on the future of Fannie and Freddie.

This is not government helping people: it is government encouraging bad behavior, rewarding those that engage in it at the expense of other, and most disgusting of all, government punishing those of us that did the right thing – practically always and without exception a side effect of bullshit liberal socio-economic policies intended “to help” people - and only serves to make things worse. I seriously hope this turns out to be a stupid rumor, and that these bastards are not going to, for the umpteenth time, screw those of us that have done the right thing and lived within our means, to buy votes and reward those that did not.

Wednesday, August 04, 2010

The government take-over bill recently rammed downour throats by a partyline vote and some of the skankiest and questionable manuevering in Congress by demcorats better known as “Obamacare” took yet another hit when Missouri voters overwhelmingly voted against it yesterday.

Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a federal mandate to purchase health insurance, rebuking President Barack Obama’s administration and giving Republicans their first political victory in a national campaign to overturn the controversial health care law passed by Congress in March. “The citizens of the Show-Me State don’t want Washington involved in their health care decisions,” said Sen. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, one of the sponsors of the legislation that put Proposition C on the August ballot. She credited a grass-roots campaign involving Tea Party and patriot groups with building support for the anti-Washington proposition. With most of the vote counted, Proposition C was winning by a ratio of nearly 3 to 1. The measure, which seeks to exempt Missouri from the insurance mandate in the new health care law, includes a provision that would change how insurance companies that go out of business in Missouri liquidate their assets.

Emphasis mine. Enough Americans get it that government, especially the federal government, forcing you to do this is unconstitutional and wrong. I wish more of them also understood that there is no such thing as free healthcare, because way too many Americans still want that. Let’s hope this is just one of the many defeats that these bastards and their attempt to have government hijack 1/6th of the economy, usurp our freedoms, and turn us into serfs dependant on the goodwill of government for our care, will suffer on a quick road to the repeal of this monstrosity.

Tuesday, August 03, 2010

That’s Tim Geithner providing cover for the failed collectivist policies now driving the country:

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner acknowledged that it is still a “tough economy” for most Americans, and warned it’s possible the unemployment rate will go up for a couple of months before it comes down as more people enter the labor force.

“When they see a little hope that there may be jobs out there, they start to come back in again. And that can cause the measured unemployment rate to go up — temporarily,” Geithner told “Good Morning America’s” George Stephanopoulos in an exclusive interview. “But what we expect to see, and I think most forecasters expect this…is an economy that’s gradually healing, gradually strengthening, businesses starting to add people back.”

The economy is not rebounding as quickly as Geithner and the Obama administration would like, he said. Last week’s economic report card showed the Gross Domestic Product grew at a rate of 2.4 percent, slower than it had earlier this year. But amid that bad news, Geithner said, were signs of growth in the private sector.

Talk about your snow job. The economy is not rebounding because collectivist wishful thinking and government funneling trillions to democrat operatives, friends, donors, lobbyists, and causes, while growing fat and large, contrary to all the fantasies, is never going to create any productive jobs. Private sector jobs produce wealth because those jobs provide net revenue to the economy and government. Government jobs destroy or shuffle wealth, and then inefficiently too, as they take private sector cash and reallocate it or simply burn it up. The morons in charge right now have done a ton of burning, and their agenda is set to burn even more, far beyond the capacity of any private sector to keep up with, in the future.

Anyway back to Geithner, and the excuse making for why these collectivists in government think they should get even more of our money, and have no doubt that this is about them feeling entitled to our money and being pissed we don’t want to go along.

“If you extend all these tax cuts just for two years or so, you’re going to leave the vast bulk of Americans…with uncertainty about what the rules of the game are going to be,” Geithner said. “What we’re proposing is to extend those tax cuts for the middle class. Extend those tax cuts for small businesses. Make clear that we’re going to keep dividends and capital gains rates, the taxes that go to business, to capital investment, at a modest rate going forward. That’ll give people more certainty.”

Get that? He is talking about the economic uncertainty Congress’ refusal to take a firm stance on the Bush tax cuts that expire at the end of this year. His take is that letting the tax cuts stay in place for an undetermined term will just keep people uncertain. So instead of saying, lets make them permanent and restart the economy, his genius solution is to just let them expire already, and hammer the people with more taxes. After all, big government needs cash to keep living large & in charge, baby! Want to see some more genius?

Geithner: ‘The Business Community Always Wants Their Taxes Lower’ Before businesses begin to use the estimated $1.8 trillion they have set aside, they want a commitment that their taxes will not increase over the next two years. Geithner did not make that promise, instead saying “the business community always wants

Evil and stupid businesses want to have low taxes! Don’t they know their sole purpose, like that of the serfs, is to feed big government cash so it can farm it out to those it favors? How dare they! Profits are evil! From each according to his ability, and to each according to his needs! And government needs!

OK, enough making fun of these morons and showing the obvious flaws in their ideology. Here is the deal. These losers know they have crashed the economy. This article, for a change, didn’t simply try to blame Bush, and hope the people stayed distracted, but they are still trying to make like the reason we are where we are and heading downwards fast, still isn’t their fault. This whole “we are going to lose more jobs before we get new ones” meme, is a demanded lie. If they keep doing what they are doing we will lose the jobs alright, but they are never coming back either.

Don’t worry though! Big government will cut you a monthly check that will provide you a standard of living at what will be considered right above the new poverty line – it will be far lower than it is now too – and like the majority of people, you won’t have to worry and covet what your neighbor has, since nobody will have anything. And although they got but a short line to show it, in this MSM article, even the Cubans have figured out government can’t create wealth: just steal it. Sad times. Get ready to have more unemployment.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Remember all those collectivists bloaviating about how they have finally stuck it to evil corporatists, capitalists, and Wall Street, by passing that 2400 plus page regulatroy monster? Well guess what: they want to conrtol the private sector, but it is damned obvious they want none of that for them:

So much for transparency. Under a little-noticed provision of the recently passed financial-reform legislation, the Securities and Exchange Commission no longer has to comply with virtually all requests for information releases from the public, including those filed under the Freedom of Information Act. The law, signed last week by President Obama, exempts the SEC from disclosing records or information derived from “surveillance, risk assessments, or other regulatory and oversight activities.” Given that the SEC is a regulatory body, the provision covers almost every action by the agency, lawyers say. Congress and federal agencies can request information, but the public cannot.

Yeah, this is going to work out real well for us all…

Read the whole thing. You simply can not make this shit up. All the evil things the left accused Bush falsely of doing they are actually doing for real. Serfs: that’s what they are going to make us all into.

Have fun, and find out how much this is going to cost you if these people don’t wise up. My numbers showed a 4.5% increase in taxation liability. That was a big chunk of change that I would now not have. Guess while government gets fat, the private sector has to tighten its belt even more. There is a cost for all that social justice stuff, and that cost is always born by the regular Joe, regardless of what the commies that push that crap tell you.

Update: Even collectivist CNBC has to run articles pointing out that any economic recovery would be hampered if tax cuts are allowed to expire. My first question is: “What economic recovery?”. The next is can these people ever stop the Obama propaganda?

The cuts were enacted in 2001 and 2003 under President George W. Bush and covered those earning more than $250,000, but they are set to expire at the end of this year.

Last I remember, and even Bush hating Wikipedia agrees with that, these tax breaks were for ALL AMERICANS, not just those making $250K and more. Oh sure, these morons at CNBC used this wording on purpose and will point out that the they chose that threshold because Saint Obama says that’s the break between rich and poor, but it is a lie intended to again make it look like evil Boooosh only cared about the rich. In fact, these were this tax act was the on that enacted the idiotic changes that left such a huge portion of Americans free of the need to pay any taxes, leaving too many amongst them without any tax obligations, and figuring in their twisted world that tax hikes, since they didn’t pay any anyway, were a fine idea.

Anyway, here is the gist of the story:

Deutsche said the drag on gross domestic product should they lapse could be as much as 1.5 percent, with the more likely impact at 1.1 percent. The impact would be worse, the analysts said, if Congress fails to fix the Alternative Minimum Tax, which was enacted in 1969 to make sure rich people pay taxes but was never indexed for inflation, and thus is now hitting middle-income workers.

“In a worst-case scenario, allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire and failing to fix the AMT could result in (1.5 percent) of fiscal drag in 2011 on top of the 1 percent fiscal drag we expect to occur as the Obama fiscal stimulus package unwinds,” Deutsche said in a note to clients. “If the recovery remains soft/tentative through early next year, this additional drag could be enough to push the economy to a stalling point.”

Don’t expect the morons holding this Congress hostage to be smart enough to figure out that letting any portion of this tax cuts expire is a bad idea. They can just pass another trillion dollar stimulus bill and deficit spend a few more trillion on top of that, to perk up the economy. After all, the last patronage bill and the $1.4 trillion dollars they flushed down the hole this year worked so well.

“As we have noted, this is not going to be an easy process politically, and it may well take a significant negative event in financial markets to steer the US political system to do what needs to be done.”

What really needs to be done is a massive rollback of the social justice state. Let people earn what they have. Not steal it from others or work in government (same thing as stealing it from others).

Friday, July 23, 2010

In a general display of how the leftist elites really feel about all those taxes they love to levy on the “undeserving rich” and everyone else, we have this interesting story about the new Kerry yacht:

Sen. John Kerry, who has repeatedly voted to raise taxes while in Congress, dodged a whopping six-figure state tax bill on his new multimillion-dollar yacht by mooring her in Newport, R.I. Isabel - Kerry’s luxe, 76-foot New Zealand-built Friendship sloop with an Edwardian-style, glossy varnished teak interior, two VIP main cabins and a pilothouse fitted with a wet bar and cold wine storage - was designed by Rhode Island boat designer Ted Fontaine.

But instead of berthing the vessel in Nantucket, where the senator summers with the missus, Teresa Heinz, Isabel’s hailing port is listed as “Newport” on her stern. Could the reason be that the Ocean State repealed its Boat Sales and Use Tax back in 1993, making the tiny state to the south a haven - like the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Nassau - for tax-skirting luxury yacht owners? Cash-strapped Massachusetts still collects a 6.25 percent sales tax and an annual excise tax on yachts. Sources say Isabel sold for something in the neighborhood of $7 million, meaning Kerry saved approximately $437,500 in sales tax and an annual excise tax of about $70,000.

The senior senator’s chief of staff David Wade denied the old salt was berthing his boat out of state to avoid ponying up to the commonwealth.

Seriously, you don’t think this decision was done on advice from his accountants to avoid taxes? If you don’t I am also sure you think Charley Rangel is being unjustly persecuted. One set of rules for thee, another for me. But we are the party of the little guy and the people. Right..

On a lighter note, Biden is again showing us how lucky we are Obama is president.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Well, it looks like the tax payer subsidized government bail outs are now at a record setting $3.7 trillion of tax payer dollars, with no end in sight. Seems that $4 trillion number we were supposed to hit at the end of Obama’s first term will come about long before we get rid of him. Some $700 billion has been forked out just in the last year.

WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Increased housing commitments swelled U.S. taxpayers’ total support for the financial system by $700 billion in the past year to around $3.7 trillion, a government watchdog said on Wednesday. The Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program said the increase was due largely to the government’s pledges to supply capital to Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) and to guarantee more mortgages to the support the housing market.

Now one can argue that it was necessary and Bush was not a moron for going along with the first $350 billion, but none of us, including GWB, liked it when congress - who controlled it back in 2008 again lefties - decided to up it to $ 700 billion, and most of us objected to it. Even though Bush was no longer running for office, republicans paid for this move in 2008, while the demcorats made a great show, even as they rigged the way the cash was being distributed to make it end up with their hobby horses, big donors, friends and lobbyists, of blaming Bush for the bad economy and the need to bail out corporations with tax payer money. Things have steadily gone down hill from there, as the TARP bailout funds became the perfect place for demcorats to hide their shenanigans, and that $700 billion number soon was nothing but wishful thinking. Here we are now closing in on the $4 trillion mark not even two years after the fact. And who, pray tell, did most of the $700 billion they spent this year go to? Why.. Nah, just read it yourself:

Increased guarantees for loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration, the Government National Mortgage Association and the Veterans administration increased the government’s commitments by $512.4 billion alone in the year to June 30, according to the report.

“Indeed, the current outstanding balance of overall Federal support for the nation’s financial system...has actually increased more than 23% over the past year, from approximately $3.0 trillion to $3.7 trillion—the equivalent of a fully deployed TARP program—largely without congressional action, even as the banking crisis has, by most measures, abated from its most acute phases,” the TARP inspector general, Neil Barofsky, wrote in the report.

So wait a minute? We aren’t bailing out banks anymore – the demcorats sure as hell are trying their best to pretend that the bailouts are for Wall Street – like before, so what did all that cash end up going to? Well you found out when you read deeper into the article, or if you had been paying attention, that the big money this year went to prop up government institutions and amongst them are none other than Freddie and Fannie, whose protectors also brought us that fun bill Hal has an awesome piece on right here. The banks in the mean time? Well, check it out:

The increased government commitments more than offset about a $300 billion decline in the U.S. Treasury’s TARP commitments in the past year as programs have closed and banks have repaid taxpayer funds.

They are paying back our money. So why are we still seeing such massive TARP expenditures still going on when the banks are paying back the cash, then?

“The fact that the Obama administration is treating TARP like its own personal slush-fund is beyond egregious and a complete betrayal of what the American people were told would be then when their tax-dollars were used to bailout Wall Street,” Issa said in a statement, adding that the housing efforts were “dumping good money after bad”.

Heh, must be more of the same game that has them avoiding both a budget before the 2010 elections and playing chicken with the Bush tax cuts that expire then too. “Hope and Change”, baby! Fiscal discipline the demcorat way....

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Man the freak show is getting even funnier! Looks like the house democrats are all pissed at the WH for throwing them under the bus after they carried Obama’s water. And they have good reason to complain seeing they are looking at Armageddon come November.

House Democrats are lashing out at the White House, venting long-suppressed anger over what they see as President Obama’s lukewarm efforts to help them win reelection—and accusing administration officials of undermining the party’s chances of retaining the majority in November’s midterm elections.

In recent weeks, a widespread belief has taken hold among Democratic House members that they have dutifully gone along with the White House on politically risky issues—including the stimulus plan, the health-care overhaul and climate change—without seeing much, if anything, in return. Many of them are angry that Obama has actively campaigned for Democratic Senate candidates but has done fewer events for House members.

The boiling point came Tuesday night during a closed-door meeting of House Democrats in the Capitol. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) excoriated White House press secretary Robert Gibbs‘s public comments over the weekend that the House majority was in doubt and that it would take “strong campaigns by Democrats” to avert dramatic losses.

After they sold their souls to push the Obama agenda, they are now literally being abandoned by the WH, which knows that the house donkeys are going to take the hit for the Obama agenda and the utter failure and disastrous future it represents.

Frankly I think Pelosi and these other moonbats should be thankful Obama isn’t showing up to help them. Helping get Obama’s policies enacted IS why they are going to get hammered come November. I am not sure I understand what they hope Obama can do for them short of telling Holder to turn away from rampant fraud most of them would need to make it a close race.

Pascrell and Pelosi were the only Democrats to address the meeting. But interviews with more than 10 lawmakers and senior aides, from liberal and conservative districts, made it clear that scores of House Democrats at the gathering shared Pascrell’s and Pelosi’s dissatisfaction. Most of those interviewed did not want to be quoted by name criticizing the president.

Heh, guess having a Chicago thug Prez does have its drawbacks. Piss him off and you pay the prize. Priceless.

One House Democrat compared their relationship with the White House to the 1970s Life commercials starring “Mikey,” the kid whose brothers trick him into eating the cereal. “There’s a sense that’s the White House’s attitude toward us,” the lawmaker said. “And now, Mikey ate it and he’s choking on it, and there’s no appreciation.”

At least Mikey was given a cereal that wasn’t toxic, like all the crap these democrat went to bat to pass for Obama was, in that commercial. Choke on it you bastards! The American people were given a ginat shit sandwich from Obama and you, so it is well deserved.

Friday, July 09, 2010

By now even the demcorats are being forced to swallow the obvious and bitter pill that come November - because the American people have had a first and candid look at hoe inept, corrupt and disconnected from reality they, their policies and their beliefs are - they are going to be massacred at the polls. I guess they must be feeling like the republicans did back in 2006 and doubly so in 2008, but they sure are handling it differently. And talk about bizarre. The advice from the pollsters and campaign consultants is for demcorats to focus on their vision of a different America than that which coincidently worked fine until they started implementing so many of their ideas and visions with more rigor and speed?

Yeah, I am sure most Americans are dumb enough to buy this message that they shouldn’t judge the demcorat’s suitability to retain political office on the fact that what they believe in and where they want to take America isn’t idiotic, destructive, economically unfeasible, and likely to end prosperity for all but the elite (which they of course are) based on the results of those beliefs and actions, but on the pretty ideas they have. That’s like saying you should pick the guy that tells you what he believes in and wants is world peace, but constantly does things that result in war. Stupid is a dmaned understatement of what these people are all about. Come on November!