Where is Lee?
Capitalism
SearchSearch this site with Google Search will take you to Google.com, which will display results from Right-Thinking and link you back here. Search using pMachineThunderdomeWe now have discussion forums! Start your own discussions about anything you choose. Two men enter, one man leaves!Categories
Monthly Archives
|
"To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?" -- Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 1803 PoliticsTuesday, December 11, 2007Why They’re A Minority Party Part VI
Remember when Republicans had credibility when it came to spending?
I understand that many Republican congresscritters are outdoorsmen. I hope so, because they’ll need to learn how to survive in the wildnerness for the foreseeable future.
Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 12/11/07 at 04:32 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Trigger Man
Oh, now he says so.
Well, I’m sure he’ll bring the same fantastic results to Philly that he did to D.C.
Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 12/11/07 at 04:03 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Cory
by Hal_10000
A devastating post from Balko on the Cory Maye case. Read the whole thing. Yet more casualties in our insane War on Drugs.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 12/11/07 at 09:23 AM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Monday, December 10, 2007Easing Up
by Hal_10000
Three nice decision by SCOTUS today:
I strongly believe that prison should be reserved for the violent—those who represent a direct physical threat to the safety of the public. Tossing non-violent crack-smokers in prison with rapists and muggers is no way to deal with our drug problem.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 12/10/07 at 04:49 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
But Here’s The Kicker
by
Merry Christmas from the Oregon voters who support the state operating within its means! Oregon has it constitutionally mandated that if the state’s collected tax income exceeds the estimates by 2%, they have to give it back. This year, Oregon has the largest kicker refund in state history.
And people are once again screeching about the “rich” getting richer over the kicker and bemoaning the $0 that somebody will get for not paying any taxes in the first place. What is it with some people and their failure to grasp the simple rules of mathematics? Anything multiplied by 0 is 0. There is no way to give a kicker to someone who paid $0 in taxes. The math doesn’t work so stop blaming the “rich”, m’kay? Me? Well, I made out real good. My wife and I received our check for $1857 on Saturday. We were surprised. We hadn’t done any kicker calculations and I figured we would get a few hundred above average. Anyway, this is going to cover our Christmas expenses. I’m going to puff up that request for a gift card that I pulled off the giving tree. Cha ching!
Posted by on 12/10/07 at 10:05 AM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Sunday, December 09, 2007We Had To Destroy the Constitution In Order To Save It
by Lee
The evil gay homosexual America-hater (boo hiss) pretty much nails Krauthammer in his defense of Bush’s torture policies. You should read the whole thing, though most of you won’t. Here’s the salient section.
And you wonder why the Divine Right of Kings has nothing to do with this. It has everything to do with this, because the end of the Divine Right of Kings was the beginning of the concept of the rule of law, versus the rule of monarchy. Or, in this case, the whim of the executive branch. The rule of law is what keeps us free, not a “strong leader” who “gets the job done” and “kills terrists"and “saves Amurka.” Seriously, if we aren’t going to expect the president or our other elected officials to follow the Constitution, then we ought to just burn the fucking thing and be done with it. Bring on the police state, and all the “safety” that it guarantees.
Posted by Lee on 12/09/07 at 11:42 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
We Knows What We’re Doings
by Hal_10000
The Agitator has the goods on three dumbass bills passed by our dumbass Congress:
We’ve covered this before. Our Congress has never been one to shy away from brutally punishing the innocent when they go after the guilty. That’ll teach poor student to go to college with downloaders!
Which means if I download an MP3 at work, the Feds could seize every computer in the building. Nice to see that the Democratic Congress is no longer the sock puppet of big industry, isn’t it?
They were worried that someone somewhere in Congress might know something ... anything! ... about the internets. I’m not, despite my blog personality here, generally a negative person. But it’s crap like this that makes me despair of the political system. The only reason for our Congress to acquiesce to these three obscenities is either ignorance or laziness. They’re just letting lobbyists and lawyers write the bills and passing without even reading them. This was the same lovely process that got us the Patriot Act. I don’t care which party you vote for in the next election as long as you vote against the incumbent. Republican or Democrat. Liberal or conservative. Let’s keep tossing them out on their ear until we get someone slightly more qualified to run this country than my cat.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 12/09/07 at 07:26 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Illegal Immigration
by Manwhore
I just got back from the store by my place. I ran into approximately three poeple that couldn’t speak English, and the cashier didn’t initiate speaking English either. Illegal immigration needs to stop. Update by Lee: The same thing happens to me all the time. :)
Posted by Manwhore on 12/09/07 at 04:17 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Saturday, December 08, 2007On Bush
by Lee
Look, folks, I want to put this on the front page, in the open, so everyone can read it and be clear about it. I do NOT think Bush is some kind of iron-fanged Satanic evil earth-destroying force. I do not think he’s going to destroy America, nor the Constitution. I have never said, nor even implied, anything so asinine. What I have said, and will make so explicitly clear now, is that Bush is the current president. When Clinton was president I complained about the things Clinton did. I complained about his policies. I did not like him as a president. I did not vote for him. I was extremely critical of him during his tenure, and have maintained that criticism. The reason I mention Bush so much is in the exact same context. Bush is the president. It is the Bush administration who have been responsible for everything that has transpired the last seven years. Who, in the name of sweet merciful fuck, am I supposed to complain about? I posted a link to a timeline of the Constituonal attacks/abuses/adaptations/changes that have taken place during his presidency. Is he, for some reason, supposed to be above criticism because he’s a Republican? Am I supposed to keep quite because Bush is (or at least claims to be) a conservative? Is criticizing our leaders now supposed to be off-limits until there’s a Democrat in the White House? Bush has done many, many things which I disagree with. He’s done a few things I thought were on track—tax cuts, dealing with Saddam Hussein, policy towards North Korea, etc.—and then ruined those successes with a series of blunders, goofs, lapses in judgment, and flat-out unconscionable actions. Again, am I supposed to keep quiet about this? Why should I? Part of the job of being president is taking the heat for the decisions you make. Christ almighty, I supervise six people here, and I am completely responsible for their performance. If my team doesn’t do well, I’m the one who gets my nuts in a sling over it. Bush is the president of the United States of America. Shouldn’t he be held, at a very minimum, to the same standard that I am? Or if my employees fuck up and my boss chews my ass out, can I just chalk it up to “Lee Derangement Syndrome” and ignore it? Remember, I used to be a staunch supporter of the president. After 9/11, when Bush’s approval ratings were in the 90% range, you could have found no more passionate advocate of Bush’s policies than me. I was right there on board with him. When the initial accusations against him came to light I too chalked it up to the typical knee-jerk liberal reaction to anything a Republican or conservative does. But as time went on, and more and more evidence came to light, I changed my mind. I’m intellectually honest enough to admit I was completely wrong about him. I’ve been saying that since about 2003, so it’s not like this is some kind of thing I just pulled out of my ass last Tuesday. Here’s the difference between Bush and Clinton. Clinton did things I disagreed with, where as Bush does things I oppose. Clinton was a liar, an absolute master at it. Bush is a liar, and not even a very good one. My opposition to Clinton was primarily political in nature, whereas my opposition to Bush supersedes parties or ideology or anything else. I don’t care who you are, what party you are in, or what ideology you subscribe to, if you try and pull the stunts Bush has pulled I am going to fight you tooth and nail. It’s got nothing to do with Bush “hatred” or any nonsense like that. I’ll put it like this: if Bush came out tomorrow and started doing things I agreed with, I’d go back to being his supporter and advocate. I think he’s generally on the right track with Iran (so far, at least), and I think his steadfastness with North Korea will pay off in the long run. But the list of Bush policies and actions I disagree with are as long as my right arm, whereas the areas of agreement are as tiny as a midget’s dick. (And this doesn’t even mention the grossly incompetent manner in which he has undertaken some of the policies I initially agreed with, such as the Iraq War.) So, again, who or what am I supposed to talk about if not Bush? He wanted this job. He sought this office, and he should be prepared to take the good with the bad. An those of you who are all too willing to accuse me of “Bush Derangement Syndrome” might want to go to the doctor and get yourself tested for “Bush Apologist Syndrome.”
Posted by Lee on 12/08/07 at 10:51 AM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Friday, December 07, 2007Wiping Your Ass With History
by Lee
One of the pillars of western civilization, the Magna Carta, is up for sale.
It’s a shame that the US Constitution isn’t for sale as well. That way, supporters of Bush’s domestic espionage, warrantless wiretapping, and torture policies could all pool their money, buy both documents, and have a party where they drink Pabst Blue Ribbon and piss all over both of them at the same time. “Habeas Corpus? Fuck that shit! One, I don’t parlay-voo no fuckin’ French, and two, I don’t know what it means, so it can’t be all that important. Besides, there’s about 11 or 12 billion terrists who wanna destroy Amurka, and we gotta torture ‘em all Jack Bauer style to find out where their nucular bombs is hidden. You know, for safety. And if you ain’t got nuthin’ to hide, then you ain’t got nuthin’ to fear from the gummint, ‘cause this is Amurka, land of the brave and home of the free or something like that. Grow a brain, morans! U-S-A! U-S-A! “ Think about this for a minute, folks. This document was written EIGHT FUCKING CENTURIES ago, and the Bush administration is now working to undermine its central pillars. And so many of you, including a lawyer who comments on this blog, are perfectly okay with this. Look, if you’re so hot to live in a country where the government can imprison you for any reason it likes, may I recommend North Korea? Trust me, there’s no crime, and no terrist attacks either. It’s a paradise of safety and security. Update: Allow me to phrase this differently. Think about everything that has happened in the last 800 years. Hell, think about the last 200 years. Contemplate the number of threats that western civilization has faced during that time. It was only a few hundred years ago that invading and conquering land just for the hell of it was considered perfectly acceptable. So was genocide. But western civilization, based largely and primarily on legal and philosophical precepts like habeas corpus, has abandoned these ancient, barbaric practices. So, you tell me. Compared to the threats that we’ve faced the last 800 years, are a few camel jockeys who hijack planes really worth abandoning eight centuries of history? Or are we going to have to lose these rights, realize our error, and then spend another 800 years trying to get them back? Terrorism is something to be rightly concerned about. But abandoning habeas corpus is far, far, far more of a threat than any plane or bomb or weapon. Update 2: Allow me to make another point, since I am anticipating the inevitable list of horrible things western civilization has done in the last 800 years. This is, of course, entirely accurate. But the point you have to keep in mind is that the document existed in the first place. Whether or not it was always enforced is another issue, it was still there. What ended slavery in the United States? The Civil War, obviously, but primarily it was the US Constitution. This document states the rights of man, not the rights of white men, even though it the rights were granted exclusively to the patriarchy in the early days. Since then the slaves have been freed, women have gotten the right to vote, and the civil rights movement has soldiered forth. And the only argument to be made was, “I am being denied the rights granted me by the Constitution.” They didn’t have to persuade someone based on any other merit, just that their rights were violated. A black man could say, as MLK did, “It says all men are created equal. Are we not also men? Therefore, we too are created equal.” If it had said “white men” he’d have a much harder argument. This is why Frederick Douglass came to regard the US Constitution as the greatest anti-slavery document in history. (See more here.) Thus the Magna Carta, while obviously imperfect in both practice and execution, laid the seed for everything that we see today. Mock me if you will, hurl around your bullshit accusations of BDS, but I happen to think 800 years of western civilization are worth defending,.
Posted by Lee on 12/07/07 at 09:50 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Blackwater Bailout
Meet the latest in a long line of folks who were doin’ a heckuva job:
Incompetence and cronyism to the end. At least this administration is consistent.
Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 12/07/07 at 04:11 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
My Take
by Hal_10000
Well, the President has gotten an agreement freeze interest rates on subprime loans. The best take I’ve seen so far is from Reason, which argues that his is basically agreeing to financial fraud and Cato which argues that the government is distorting the market ... again! (Cato also argues that anti-sprawl measures are responsible for parts of the housing bubble. Living in a state whose last planned community was the Alamo, I’m inclined to agree.) I’m obviously not an economist. But I get bad vibes left right and center on this deal. See, one way or another, the housing market is going to crash. Maybe this deal will spread the pain out over a longer period of time—or at least delay it until oil prices drop (ha ha). But I suspect it will simply keep people trapped in their upside-down mortgages and just delay the crash, possibly making it worse. What smells on this is that the subprime freeze expires well after Bush leaves office and just in time for the 2010 election. That’s sound suspiciously like making the inevitable someone else’s problem. In that sense, it’s perfectly in keeping with our policies on the budget, Medicare, Social Security, global warming and Paris Hilton. In a way, I’m reminded of the inflation of the late 70’s. Everyone knew how to fix it—the Fed needed to tighten the money supply. But no one was willing to do it because of the massive recession that would immediately hit (the hangover, as Heinlein called it). Reagan did it. The economy crashed. By 1983, he was in the 30’s in approval rating. And by 1984, we had fast economic growth and tons of jobs without inflation (and a landslide election victory). I suspect a similar price is going to be paid with subprimes. Our “ownership society” is going to crash at some point, causing a recession and a housing slump. But it needs to happen to clear out the stupid loans and to punish the banks stupid enough to lend money to people they shouldn’t. Our economy will recover, as long we don’t elect too many Democrats. But the recession will be nasty and CBS will have plenty of People Like Us stories about people losing homes they shouldn’t have bought in the first place. Everyone knows this is what’s going to happen. And everyone wants to put it off until after the next election. This depressing thing is that the Democrats are screaming that this isn’t enough. It won’t help people who can’t afford their current teaser rates. Actually, I suspect what they really want is for the government to buy everybody a house.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 12/07/07 at 11:56 AM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Weakend At Bernie’s
by
Left wing talk show host indicted on federal child pornography charges.
Ah yes, the Pete Townsend defense. I’m inclined to calls these guys “fringe culprits”. It’s like if kiddie porn was a black hole and if you fly too close, you could get sucked down into it. Pete Townsend was cleared and warned. His defense was probably legit and I seem to recall that he produced materials to back up his claims. Does Ward have the same materials he can present? I don’t know guys. A former Catholic priest? What the hell? I would really like to know why so many people in the clergy have problems like this. What’s the relationship? Anyway, because he’s been such a critic of the right and especially Bush, some people are already claiming that the prosecution of this case is an attempt by the Bush administration to silence him. Nevermind that he apparently viewed, saved and distributed multiple images. Imagine yourself in that situation if you can. If you were honestly doing research for your book, would you think it was appropriate to send out these pictures let alone possess them? Who in a position like Bernie Ward doesn’t know this. Pete Townsend is a musician writing a book. Musicians are often dumbasses and have long track records of exercising poor judgment. Bernie Ward was a priest and has been a journalist and talk show host for decades. My God man! Get a clue!
As far as blaming Bush goes, that’s a tough one. The federal prosecutor could easily dismiss this case in my opinion. From what I’ve read, it seems like a very slim margin here. Of course, there may be more we don’t know. There’s a seal on the case. Is it beyond the realm of possibility that someone is making sure this case in particular is prosecuted? Tell me what you think.
Posted by on 12/07/07 at 09:57 AM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Thursday, December 06, 2007Freedom Money
It sounds like an idea whose time has come.
Is this the beginning of the end of McCain-Feingold? One can only hope.
Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 12/06/07 at 03:34 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
Wednesday, December 05, 2007The New Protectionists
She was for free trade before she was against it.
The problem with Her Highness’s position is that, aside from the fact that she’s wrong about Samuelson’s views, it’s as out of date as her plans for big government health care are. We live in a global economy that is becoming regionalized, like the world’s defense and political alliances. If you want real protectionism you would have to do it in cooperation with Mexico, Canada and South America against Europe and China. And considering that Bush picked up where her hubby left off, I’d consider continuing down his path when it comes to trade a compliment.
Posted by West Virginia Rebel on 12/05/07 at 07:31 PM in Politics •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink •
Discuss this in the forums
|
![]() Server Drive![]() Who's Logged In
Total Members: 2753 Links and InfoRecent Comments
PJ On Everything The BlogrollMost recent entries
Stats
This page has been viewed 19600847 times Subscribe |