Category: Site News

CRASH!!!

Well, the site went tits up. I posted comments on two separate threads, neither showed up in the comments section. I imagine everyone is now unable to post comments. Thus, we find ourselves adrift.

“What in Hell goes on in New York?”

Entering Hard Hat Area

As opposed to emailing the relevant folks for status and in the interest of addressing any uncertainties as to who now has the car keys to the blog and what changes cosmetically are afoot, I thought I would post a repository, a place where those in charge can identify themselves.

The last few posts related to the subject intimated that either Thrill or Alex (or both jointly) would handle the admin duties and tackle the Herculean task of exorcising all the gremlins that have taken up residency on our blog. Not an enviable chore, but necessary. A number of good suggestions were offered up in the other post, but for now just getting the basics to work would be nice.

So far only Cress and Xetrov have volunteered to guest author, how do we get these guys author privileges? I still have the author template that Jim sent me originally, I would be glad to forward it over to both and help them get started, but they need permission from the admin guy.

On my “dashboard” to the site I have access to all the commenter’s email address. Since the PM services and the “contact” button are still busted, if anyone has questions or concerns they can shoot me an email, I have gotten a few already. I don’t mind being a buffer for admin so they don’t get overwhelmed, but since somebody needs to be “The Man”, he can come here and post anything he wants to disseminate to the group.

Collaboration Is Needed

I expect everyone has read Jim’s post and his subsequent frustrations in getting the site glitches fixed. The good news is that the author tools appear to be restored. But the appearance of the site has been altered. No progress has been made on fixing the Registration issues, so as it stands now no new members can be added.

As a community we need to decide what is to become of this blog. I suspect that just about everyone would like it to survive, and beyond that, to thrive. None of this will happen without some effort.

Jim needs to turn over the admin reins to someone willing to maintain the site. The way I see it, the admin guy does not have to be an author. I think once everything is up and running, very little work will actually be involved, but there does need to be someone in charge of this. I would volunteer but my computer skills are somewhat limited. I am going to look into WordPress and try to figure it out so eventually I could help out with the admin duties, but right now I am pretty worthless in this area. Are there any on the regulars that would like to take this on, even on a temporary basis? I have reached out to some one in particular and am awaiting his reply but a contingency plan is always beneficial.

The other issues we need to discuss is author duties. The consensus of the comments in my Suggestion Box post was that more authors are needed, could not agree more. A suggestion, how about we find out who wants to contribute, get a list of volunteers than choose 2 from the last to start, see how that works out with the option of adding more at a later date, thus keeping it somewhat controllable and not too cumbersome? A process also needs to be decided on who gets authorship duties.

Once a new admin is chosen and things are functional again, I am all for tinkering with the look and its ability to mesh with other social sites. Of the blogs I visit regularly, they all morph with the times, evolve, and get better, more user friendly.

So there you have it. Hopefully we can get input from everyone, put the suggestions to practice and make this a blog that will grow in time and be relevant.

Suggestion Box

I wanted this post to be a collaborative effort involving the other main authors, a pooling of ideas if you will in an attempt to resuscitate a dying blog, but was unsuccessful in reaching out, so everything that follows is of my own doing (thus offering plausible deniability for the others).

Although the writing was clearly on the wall, Section8 ‘s comment a few days ago put a face on it (figuratively), and identified the obvious, namely that what was once a great thriving vibrant blog, as turned dull and barren. Although I understand the sentiment of the comment, he is wrong when he says ,” Conservative interest left this place a long time ago”. We, OK, I continue the fight when I feel so inspired to post here, which I admit has become less and less urgent. I also don’t think it is time to bail, although I get that sentiment as well, it is hard watching the patient wither away with only a feeding tube and heart monitor to keep him company.

Part of the problem, as I see it, is the way the blog is being administered. It has very basic structural deficiencies which makes it cumbersome for the users. All the author tools we had before for comments (hyperlinks, quotes, bolding, italics, and the all important EDIT button) disappeared. The PM (private messaging) service is bollocks, a useful tool for contacting members individually and something that I used regularly, now broken and unusable. The CONTACT button is also useless, said comment getting lost in cyberspace.

Part of the problem, is the paucity of contributing authors and comment worthy posts. A post a day, sometimes less, hardly promotes the type of traffic successful blogs get. I admit that in this area I am part of the problem, often finding post worthy topics but end with ,”Why bother?”, and go on to something else.

Part of the problem is the practices exhibited at times that drives regulars to leave. Although some could say that the ease at which they capitulate and flee says more about them and their convictions of argument, I would prefer that all would feel welcome, that pejoratives like “idiot” and “moron” be used less often, and more effort be made understanding the comment and not the motives behind it. Several of our old regulars, guys like Thrill, Mook, Blameme, Salinger, Kimpost (although given the state of Sweden nowadays I figured he just converted and spends all his free time praying to Allah) they have moved on, pity.

The other day I went to my local library, and attempted to register on the site as a new user. The last step involved the site emailing a password so I could log in and post comments, guess what? No email. This tells me that if somebody new stumbles on our site, likes what we offer and wants to become a regular, he can’t do it, no new members allowed, more evidence of a broken blog.

OK, here’s the deal, assuming it is even possible to fix these things, to make a more user friendly site and allow new members to join (maybe Hal has admin tools or someone knows a guy who knows a guy, etc.,etc.) what do you guys think we can do to up the traffic? Are there any suggestions coming to mind as to either content or individual postings? Do we need more authors? What could we be doing that we are not doing now?

I am coming at this from a frame of mind that I care about this blog (having been around since pretty much day one) and am tired of it getting sand kicked in its face. Maybe the handful of regulars are happy with the status quo and don’t welcome change. If that is the case, we can that it, we can do nothing and limp along. Some blogs exist out there with no readership, just some mope writing stuff to write. We are not far from that.

Any ideas?

Happy Thanksgiving to all

Want to wish all of you put there a happy Thanksgiving. Take this time to be with the people you love, if you can, and reflect on all the good we have. Tomorrow we can get back to bitching about how the political aristocracy is destroying our country and the world.

Be safe if you have to travel. Enjoy your day, but do not take unnecessary risks. If you have the chance, enjoy a good meal. Do it in good company.

Cut Off In the Land Down Under

I’m in Australia again, visting the in-laws. Unfortunately, our home has no internet at the moment because of a dispute with the telecom (the idiocy of ISP’s is apparently a universal constant). I’m typing this in a mall in Queensland, which means I’m at minimal Tweeting (I have a list cut down to about a dozen of the most essential feeds for this sort of occasion) and have about 800 unread articles in Google Reader, which I will mostly ignore. So, yeah, not much blogging until the telecom gets their head out of their ass.

I won’t be able to watch the SOTU but I will download, read and respond to it. Hopefully, I’ll be back in action by the end of the week. But even then, I’ll probably maintain a low profile since, you know, I’m on vacation.

Admin, domain owner and head asshole here…

Hi.

PAY THE FUCK ATTENTION.

Do I have your attention, dear reader? Each and every one of you? Good.

You do not, ever, get to decide what is or isn’t appropriate subject matter for this blog. I, and by extension those who write here as main page authors, get to do that. You do not get to decide who should comment or who shouldn’t. You do not get to decide what we talk about, or for how long, or, to be quite frank, ANY FUCKING THING AT ALL.

You especially – and if you drifted off mentally at the above, please refocus now and read this next bit carefully – YOU DO NOT GET TO SPEND MY MONEY AND BANDWIDTH SHITTING ALL OVER THIS BLOG DAY IN AND DAY OUT. If you levy more than one complaint a week about how this place is run, yet you can’t leave? FUCK YOU. You’re the asshole. Get out. Leave, if it bothers you so much. I’m fed the fuck up with it.

I’m not discussing things, or taking anything under advisement, or trying to hear “your side of it” anymore. If you can’t stand the way this place operates, well guess what, sunshine? YOU CAN STOP COMING HERE. It’s literally that simple.

What I would like to see is arguments on various topics, without the bullshit. By bullshit I mean namecalling, feigned innocence, 50 comments a day, etc. THIS GOES FOR AUTHORS AS WELL. Stop picking fights with commenters.

Just, I don’t know, in general, for everyone: STOP BEING SUCH UNBELIEVABLE CUNTS ALL THE GODDAMNED TIME. Is that really so fucking hard? Stop. Or I’ll stop you. I’m at my limit.

Site stuff: Comment formatting

I’ve been seeing a lot of discussion in various places about comments, basically nested versus chronological style. I used to think nested was the only way to go, but it has created a number of weird problems on this site…so, a query:

Do you prefer the current nested style, or would you prefer a simple chronological style like we had at the old place? I’m totally willing to change it to chrono if more people prefer it.

Hey assholes

Read this. Act accordingly. And stop being cunts.

*edit*

Goddamned achor links don’t work right, so here’s the text of the comment I just left (and linked to):

STOP.

I will wipe this fucking place clean before I let all of this bullshit continue. I will burn everything and salt the fucking earth.

Or just ban the people that make it impossible to enjoy the blog.

HEED THESE WORDS: My patience is not just at an end, it is gone. Exhausted. Finis. It is an ex-patience.

The next person to start an endless flame war full of old baggage gets a one-way ticket to GetTheFuckOutOfMyYardsville.

Test me. Go ahead.

An Introduction

This being my first post as an author here on Right Thinking, before I get started I want to say thanks to JimK for making it possible. I sincerely hope he doesn’t regret that decision down the road.

Besides landing on blogs and reading while following links from articles and forums, and lurking here for a short period before actually posting any replies, I’m brand new to the blogosphere, so please accept my preemptive apologies for any broken links or missing pictures or videos that I’m pretty sure are imminent in the coming days/weeks while I learn.

I will be following this post shortly with one about the constitutional issues surrounding the new Super Committee, or “Super Congress” as some are referring to it as. Most of what I have to say will have the Constitution at the root of my motivation for wanting to discuss a given issue. I am a constitutional originalist, which can just as easily be written with caps as “Constitutional Originalist,” because the words serve as a description of my thought processes on everything having to do with politics and national policies in America (lower case), as well as identifying the only “party” type of affiliations or ideology I claim. I am neither Independent, Republican, Libertarian, nor Constitution Party affiliated. I am simply an independent Constitutional Originalist, or constitutional orginalist, whichever works for you.

So with that, I’ll head off to put my post on the Super Committee together, and say thanks again to JimK for the opportunity, and hello to the rest of you.

CzarChasm