Faux Scandal 122345!

As the IRS scandal – which involves activity that goes over and beyond anything that led to another president’s resignation – heads towards day 500 of being ignored by the collectivists, and revelation after revelation of one kind of abuse of power and/or downright criminal activity keeps being buried by the LSM to cover for the “Most ethical administration evah!”, we find out that there is more:

The Department of Labor coordinated with the White House on whether or not to release hidden portions of former Labor Secretary Hilda Solis’ schedule as Solis battled an FBI investigation into her illegal fundraising for President Obama.

New emails provided to The Daily Caller from the nonprofit legal research firm Cause of Action show the White House thanking the Department of Labor for “flagging” a public information request for “withheld” portions of Solis’ schedule. (SEE THE EMAIL CHAIN). The White House then asked for the name of the conservative group making the request — information that Labor officials were eager to give up.

As TheDC previously reported, Solis illegally fundraised for the Obama campaign and headlined a Latino-themed Obama fundraiser while on a trip in her official capacity as a Cabinet member, which is forbidden by the Hatch Act (AUDIO: SOLIS LEAVING A PHONE MESSAGE ILLEGALLY FUNDRAISING FOR OBAMA).

YAWN! They are starting to notice now that this crime syndicate doesn’t give a fuck about campaign financing regulations? Remember this is the group that got caught using foreign credit cards in a system that didn’t validate this information, to raise campaign funds, and got away with it. Why think that they stopped at that and were not doing other illegal and criminal things to get money? After all, to these progtards, the end justifies the means. I guess they didn’t have the people that deleted the email for them at the IRS to do the same in this case.

I am sure Holder, Obama’s consigliore will be on this clearly criminal act ASAP. Unless you have a republican in the WH the left, and especially the leftards in the LSM, really don’t much care about abuse of power, crime, and justice. The left is its own best parody. You can bet that whatever they accuse the other side of they are actually doing themselves, or doing far worse. Cheat, steal, and even murder or use murder for profit? Check, and double check. And yet they keep pretending that they are champions of the people. Heh! Obama will soon be on the right made this up too.


NYT admission that democrats are anti-second amendment thugs

The NYT OpEd page carries an article by Lois Becket which all but admits that democrats manufactured the term assault weapon because they hate armed citizens, and it now being admitted because this author thinks they should ban handguns:

OVER the past two decades, the majority of Americans in a country deeply divided over gun control have coalesced behind a single proposition: The sale of assault weapons should be banned. That idea was one of the pillars of the Obama administration’s plan to curb gun violence, and it remains popular with the public. In a poll last December, 59 percent of likely voters said they favor a ban. But in the 10 years since the previous ban lapsed, even gun control advocates acknowledge a larger truth: The law that barred the sale of assault weapons from 1994 to 2004 made little difference. It turns out that big, scary military rifles don’t kill the vast majority of the 11,000 Americans murdered with guns each year. Little handguns do. In 2012, only 322 people were murdered with any kind of rifle, F.B.I. data shows.

The continuing focus on assault weapons stems from the media’s obsessive focus on mass shootings, which disproportionately involve weapons like the AR-15, a civilian version of the military M16 rifle. This, in turn, obscures some grim truths about who is really dying from gunshots. Annually, 5,000 to 6,000 black men are murdered with guns. Black men amount to only 6 percent of the population. Yet of the 30 Americans on average shot to death each day, half are black males.

It was much the same in the early 1990s when Democrats created and then banned a category of guns they called “assault weapons.” America was then suffering from a spike in gun crime and it seemed like a problem threatening everyone. Gun murders each year had been climbing: 11,000, then 13,000, then 17,000. Democrats decided to push for a ban of what seemed like the most dangerous guns in America: assault weapons, which were presented by the media as the gun of choice for drug dealers and criminals, and which many in law enforcement wanted to get off the streets. This politically defined category of guns — a selection of rifles, shotguns and handguns with “military-style” features — only figured in about 2 percent of gun crimes nationwide before the ban.

Emphasis mine. That term – assault weapons – was manufactured by democrats to push the anti-second amendment agenda. At least the author now admits that the problem the left has with guns is that their is no legal solution to people that feel life is cheap and that don’t care about laws, and making up shit to scare people doesn’t really stop crime. But her solution seems to be more of the same. The only way to reduce gun crime is to educate people about guns and to really put the type of people that use guns to commit the crime of murder out of circulation. But demcorats don’t want to do either. Roll back the stupid laws and actually deal with the criminals as criminals.

By request: Obama destroys US – Collectivists compare Boosh to Hitler

While Obama and the band of thieves collectively referred to as the democratic party are destroying the country at a harrowing pace – and have no doubt that Obama is doing the same things the left went bat shit about when Boosh was doing them, only Obama is doing this on steroids, but getting a pass – it should not surprise anyone that shit like this is being pushed by the usual suspects:

A D.C. public school gave a sixth grade class a homework assignment that required students to draw comparisons between former President George W. Bush and Adolf Hitler.

The assignment was given out this week at McKinley Tech Middle School in Northeast and has angered at least one parent who complained about the homework.

A copy of the assignment, made by the parent, instructs students to draw examples from two texts they were assigned and to fill in a Venn diagram with similarities and differences between the two men.

“Now that we have read about two men of power who abused their power in various ways, we will compare and contrast them and their actions. Please refer to your texts, ‘Fighting Hitler — A Holocaust Story’ and ‘Bush: Iraq War Justified Despite No WMD’ to compare and contrast former President George W. Bush and Hitler. We will use this in class tomorrow for an activity!” reads the text at the top of the assignment.

If you were inclined to believe the bullshit that this was an exercise to just compare abuse of power, they should have picked Obama. The downright depraved and criminal behavior by this administration has engaged in makes Boosh’s presidency look real good in comparison. Of course, the agenda is to fill the mush heads minds with the belief things are otherwise. The left is desperate to rewrite history, and now doubly so, to provide cover for what is the most corrupt administration to have held power in my lifetime, and just like with everything else, the agenda is to blame Boosh.

A more apt comparison to Hitler would be Obama, and that’s for sure. Both have the same socialist bend in spades, believing that a big all-powerful government run by a strongman, leading the charge and favoring the connected few, is the answer to all the country’s problems. The only thing they have that comes to me immediately as a difference, is that Hitler thought his people and country where the best, and Obama pretends that’s what he believes while acting always to prove that he stands for the contrary.

US Tax payer’s money at use. Shit like this compare Boosh to Hitler nonsense, especially in the age of Obama, whom is a far better fit when you want to discuss criminal behavior and abuse of power, makes dumb shit like this, look like a wise investment.

Obamacare not free, and kills jobs – rehash

Those of us that pointed out Obamacare was going to hit everyone, but especially small businesses, hard in the pocketbook, but then also kill jobs, should feel a measure of vindication now that the LSM has been forced to admit that the truth is Obamacare has killed a lot of small business jobs and sucked big money out of the economy, but there is no joy in this information making the light of day after the LSM shills helped the America haters pass this economy killer.

Obamacare is taking a toll on small businesses, according to a new analysis of the effects of the health-care reform law, which found billions of dollars in reduced pay and hundreds of thousands fewer jobs.

Take-home pay at small businesses was trimmed by some $22.6 billion annually because of the Affordable Care Act and related insurance premium hikes, researchers at the American Action Forum, a center-right think tank headed by former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, found in a report released Tuesday.

Individual year-round employees at businesses with 50 to 99 workers lost $935 annually, while those at firms with 20 to 49 workers are out an average of $827.50 per person in take-home pay, the report found.

That report also says that there has been the loss of more than 350,000 jobs due to Obamacare-era premium hikes at small businesses.

You think? Free shit that ain’t free and the usual idiots figured they would demand the evil producers pay for ends up not only costing employees their home pay AND has resulted in reductions in job opportunities? I wonder if they only report on existing jobs that were killed, or if this number accounts for actual jobs that now will never materialize, as people that don’t like the idea that progressives can just rob them blind to buy votes under false pretenses, decide to not play along. My guess is this only accounts for real job losses. The LSM would hate to really have to report on how bad this boondoggle law is. I did find a silver lining though:

In five states, the losses have exceeded more than 20,000 jobs apiece, including Florida, New York, Ohio and Texas. California lost an estimated 42,788 jobs due to Obamacare, the report estimated.

It looks like with the exception of Florida, the states hit hardest, are all progressive bastions. There might be some justice in the universe still, I guess. But the pain has only just begun. While they are not addressing the issue of future small business job losses caused by Obamacare, they are talking about what’s happening, likely in an attempt to paint the small business owners in as negative as possible a light, by claiming that they are preemptively responding to this terrible law.

And those wage and job-level effects have come before the implementation of Obamacare’s employer mandate, which beginning in 2016 will compel firms with 50 to 99 full-time workers to offer them health coverage or pay a fine.

“We find evidence that the labor force is absorbing these detrimental costs even before the government has started enforcing the most stringent ACA regulations,” the report said. “These costs are likely a result of businesses preparing for the employer mandate, providing health insurance to workers and losing access to low-cost coverage.”

Bastages! How dare they do whatever it takes for Obamacare not to put them out of business? Don’t they know that their jobs is just to be the money bags for the progressives and their cockamamie schemes and scams? Profiteers! Healthcare is a right. More government meddling to force them to play along and swallow the poison pill! And all that other nonsense not being spoken, but implied. The evil scum are responding to their civic duty by working within the framework of this insane and costly law to ensure their ability to survive.

Batkins said the research detected a marked response at small businesses to insurance premium prices after the implementation of the ACA in 2010, in contrast to how those employers responded to price hikes before the law was adopted. Specifically, there was a correlation between small businesses’ cutting jobs and workers’ take-home pay being reduced when premiums went up after the ACA took effect, as opposed to before.

“While there was no significant relationship between health-care premiums and employment before the ACA, since 2010 small businesses have slowly started shedding jobs and reducing wages,” the report said.

That nonsense is code for they are also not creating any new jobs as well. Welcome to what everyone predicted about the impact of this behemoth on small businesses, which happen to form the backbone of the American economic engine. Of course, with progressives loving big and married to government, this is a feature to these types. Unfortunately for them though, the mega corps are not going to do much better. Business, those with over the 99 employee threshold, but especially the big conglomerates, usually unionized, that tend to contribute big to democrats in return for special favors, unless they were able to buy an exclusion, are also getting into the game. Many of these entities are looking at the soon to come employer mandates and will be quite happy to drop all insurance for their workforce.

“Obviously, these are huge numbers,” lead author Sam Batkins said about the findings.

And because of the employer mandate coming down the road, “we expect the trends to worsen,” Batkins added.

You think? Wait until employers dump people, en mass, and we all find out, yet again, that the progtards lied about being able to keep your plans, doctors, and decent and affordable coverage. VA quality care for everyone, with longer waits, and at higher prices! But they meant well! Maybe that’s why they are flooding the country with illegals while denying people that are legally applying entry in the country too. They mean well. Let’s look at some numbers:

In all, the $22.6 billion in reduced take-home pay equals 6 percent of all wages in the small-business category.

The 350,000 estimated jobs the report said have been lost in small businesses because of Obamacare came entirely from employers with just 20 to 49 workers.

Again. That’s a big chunk of change, and the numbers that lost employment, while scary and not trivial, pales compared to the fact that new jobs are impacted even worse by this crap law. In the meantime, government employees that are exempt from Obamacare are seeing big raises. There is a reason that Obama decided to push the employer mandate (not to be confused with 2 guys going on a date) past the coming election cycle. These scumbags know it will be devastating, but don’t much care other than it can impact their reelection chances so they can keep their hold on power. Awesome stuff.

Asked if the overall costs to small business employment and wages are warranted by Obamacare’s goal of providing affordable health insurance to millions of uninsured people, and of improving the quality of insurance offered to enrollees, Batkins said, “I think the jury is still out.”

“This report has shown that the costs are fairly high,” Batkins said. “And the enrollment is going to have to be fairly high, as well, to cover the costs.”

Yeah sure, the jury is only out if you can’t admit that this was a horrible and economically crippling idea, because you are riding the “I want to buy your vote with the false promise of free shit” bandwagon. There is no fixing this monstrosity. It needs to be repealed. Killed dead. Then we can go about actually pushing for the things that fix the system and reduce costs instead of helping democrats destroy it so they can push for a single payer system that will finally allow them to use healthcare as yet another cudgel to beat those that will not bow to the all mighty nanny-state into compliance.

What progressivism – Social Justice, in a nut shell – always ends up being.

Venezuela is the latest example of what progressivism works out to be in a nutshell. Chavez, another idiot that gained power passing himself off as a man of the people, and buying votes by promising to rob his country’s producers in the name of some fabricated and idiotic social construct, has ruined what once was a growing and thriving economy. Sure Venezuela had problems and poverty before Chavez, but things are far, far worse, today. Case in point, the death of the goose that laid Venezuela’s golden eggs:

As weird as it seems, President Nicolás Maduro’s government plans to start importing crude oil for the first time in order to blend it with Venezuela’s own crude and keep the country’s overall production from falling further, the Reuters news agency reported last week, citing an internal document from Venezuela’s state-owned PDVSA oil company.

It turns out that Venezuela’s own production of light crudes has plummeted since the late President Hugo Chávez took office in 1999, and the country desperately needs light crudes to blend with its Orinoco Basin extra heavy crude oils. Without such a blend, the Orinoco Basin’s extra heavy crude is too dense to be transported through pipelines to Venezuelan ports and exported abroad.

Venezuela’s oil production, which accounts for 95 percent of the country’s export earnings, should be used in world classrooms as a textbook case of what happens when a populist government starts distributing a country’s wealth in cash subsidies, without investing in maintenance and innovation. Much like happened with Cuba’s once flourishing sugar industry, Venezuela’s Chávez-inspired populism has destroyed the goose that laid the golden eggs.

In 1999, when Chávez took office, PDVSA had 51,000 employees and produced 63 barrels of crude a day per employee. Fifteen years later, PDVSA had 140,000 employees, and produced 20 barrels of crude a day per employee, according to an Aug. 14 report by the France Press news agency.

Venezuela’s net oil exports have plummeted from 3.1 million barrels a day in 1997 to 1.7 million barrels a day in 2013, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates.

Curious to find out how a country with the world’s largest oil reserves can end up importing oil, I called Evanán Romero, a former Venezuelan vice minister of energy and former PDVSA director, who now works as an oil industry consultant.

Romero told me that the Venezuelan government desperately needs to speed up oil exports to get cash, because the government is bankrupt. Inflation has surpassed an annual rate of 60 percent, and Venezuela will be Latin America’s country with the lowest economic growth this year, according to World Bank estimates.

But to speed up oil exports, Venezuela needs to blend its heavy crudes from the Orinoco Basin with lighter imported crudes, because Venezuela is no longer producing enough light crudes of its own. Production of light crudes has fallen because of lack of investments, abandonment of exploration of light crude areas, and the nationalization of companies that used to help produce light crudes.

Venezuela has asked foreign companies that operate in the Orinoco Basin to invest in “upgrading” facilities that help make heavy-crude exportable, but the companies did not want to take that risk because they fear expropriations, or because they don’t think it’s a good investment as long as they are only allowed a minority ownership under government rules.

Collectivists always expect everyone else to sacrifice, and yet, they claim and believe they have the right to take the fruit of other people’s labor, no matter what the consequences of that theft, because they mean well. When others decide not to bend over and grab their ankles every time the progressives come a knocking, they get pissed and accuse them of being greedy. But the truth is nobody causes more harm, destruction, misery, and human indignity than your pretend do-gooder progressive as they steal from those that produce under the pretense of redressing some evil or injustice.

Humanity is heading for another dark age as the labors of the collectivists destroy centuries of progress by their betters. Everywhere that progressives have taken hold, things have gone, are going, or will go bad. The more open the thievery, the quicker the downfall. The Soviet Union and its satellite states imploded in a short 7 decades because they went to one extreme to push their corrupted version of paradise on earth. The last bastions of this idiotic belief are Cuba and North Korea, the Chinese long ago abandoning anything other than the tyranny of progressivist rulership – something that amounts to nothing more than another aristocracy lording it over the serfs, sometimes under the heel of a single madman that bathes in the blood of those he plunges into his contrived misery – in order to maintain power. They are all doomed, including the Chinese, because that system simply destroys man and man’s dignity.

New upstarts like Venezuela show us that those that do it without the usual bloody revolution and the millions of deaths, still lead the unfortunate idiots they have fooled down the same road. Progressivism’s promise of social justice always, without fail, produces misery and indignity. It matters little that they can, in the beginning and for some time, pretend or show that their actions have made things look better: in the end though, their actions produce the same outcome, be it in a short span of time, or over long decades. They destroy everything they touch, and the vital system that produces wealth collapses, leaving everyone living in misery and under the heels of a tyrannical master or oligarchy that thinks more of the same is what is needed to fix the very problem of their making.

Have no doubt that the shit done by the Western democracies is heading the same way. Obama’s reign in the US and his expedited efforts at the destruction of a once great nation, as well as and what’s going on in Europe, should leave no one any doubt that there is any way to salvage the situation if the progressives and their ways are allowed to continue. You can not steal from others – especially when you accuse them of having because they steal – to make things right. Greed and envy are not good emotions to base a philosophy that claims to want to right wrongs on, but that’s progressivism in a nut shell. In the end it only serves to replace whatever group one claims is engaged in some injustice with one person or another group that is doing fare worse evil.

It is time to tell these people to take a long hike off a short pier.