Bernie-bro does what the left has been fantasizing about: dnc lackeys cry out for gun control

So after several months of the insane leftist bullshit peddled by the dnc operatives with bylines and all the enlightened usual progressive virtue signalers showing their creds with such things as decapitated Trump heads or assassinated Trump Ceasar, we get a Bernie-bro that <a href=’http://heavy.com/news/2017/06/james-hodgkinson-alexandria-gop-baseball-shooter-shooting-gunman-identified-illinois/” target=”_new”>that takes matters into his own hand. As soon as I heard this happened I was willing to be a kidney it would be a proggy or a member of the religion of peace, and that the media would cover that fact and immediately switch to the usual gun control pap. My favorite was the moron on tweeted the following:

No matter what his political beliefs were, the moment he used violence he became a right wing domestic terrorist.

Leftist ideology and insanity begets violence, and that makes you right wing. On the other hand, this explains why lefties want you to so desperately believe Hitler was right wing and not a socialist like them.

Here is some advice to the people claiming the problem is white men and guns: practically everyone of these nut jobs has been a progressive or a member of the religion of peace (and when they have told us otherwise it has usually been dnc operatives with bylines desperately trying to white washed those facts). Maybe instead of calling for gun or white men bans, we should ban that those two ideologies that seem to disproportionately produce these fucking nutjobs and violence?

40 comments:

  1. Hal_10000

    practically everyone of these nut jobs has been a progressive or a member of the religion of peace

    Really?  McVeigh? Roof?  James Jackson?  Eric Rudolph?  The Planned Parenthood attack? The Portland attack? The Sikh temple attack?

    Jesus, get your nose out of Infowars for once.

    Thumb up 2

  2. TxAg94

    Wow, CM, I feel like you’re trying to say that you believe your government is tyrannical (at least the part with an “R” by their names) and deserving of being shot.

    Thumb up 0

  3. CM

    Of course the politicians are making it about gun control, and the liberal media are ignoring the shooter’s politics…the left loves to incite, but never own, the violence they encourage.

    Rand tweeted last year that you have a Second Amendment to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical. Trump incited and condoned violence against political opponents throughout his campaign, I have yet to find any record of Bernie doing anything other than speaking strongly against violence.

    Can you provide evidence that the media is ignoring the fact that this guy was a BernieBro? I’ve seen and heard it everywhere.

    Thumb up 2

  4. AlexInCT *

    Really?  McVeigh?

    Oh please. McVeigh had a beef with government because it wasn’t progressive enough.

    Roof?  James Jackson?  Eric Rudolph?  The Planned Parenthood attack? The Portland attack? The Sikh temple attack?

    So what? About 6 cases? Out of how many again? English must not be your primary language when you fail to parse the worlds “practically all”

    Jesus, get your nose out of Infowars for once.

    Ooh, you really gave it to me there, man! Except for the fact I don’t read infowars.

    Thumb up 0

  5. AlexInCT *

    Rand tweeted last year that you have a Second Amendment to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical.

    Can’t get more tyrannical than Obama did except for if Clinton had won, but how many people shot government people there?

    BTW CM, thanks for confirming you are a OK with attempt at murder as long as it is against people you don’t like and the opportunity lets you grandstand for political gain. It is refreshing to see so many leftists defend this for once and be honest about what they really are like.

    Thumb up 2

  6. Hal_10000

    Oh please. McVeigh had a beef with government because it wasn’t progressive enough.

    OK. You’re just trolling at this point.  You don’t have any legitimate points to make.  I’m done arguing with your bullshit.

    Thumb up 2

  7. TxAg94

    via CM: London Fire: Muslims Beginning Ramadan Fast May Have Saved Lives In Grenfell Tower

     

    Yeah, I would assume Muslims observing a holiday would do so just the same as a Catholic, atheist, Holy Spaghetti Monster worshiper.  Why is this even a separate news story?  Why WOULDN’T they help?

    Thumb up 0

  8. CM

    Yeah, I would assume Muslims observing a holiday would do so just the same as a Catholic, atheist, Holy Spaghetti Monster worshiper.  Why is this even a separate news story?  Why WOULDN’T they help?

    It’s been made clear to me that they’re involved in a death-cult. So worth noting for sure.

    Thumb up 2

  9. Hal_10000

    I may have a post on that London fire. I’ve been reading some reports today that the fire spread because of an enviro-friendly cladding that has been retrofitted onto hundreds of buildings. There was a massive fire in Melbourne in a building clad in the same material. And there was a blog documenting all kinds of fire hazards that was ignored.  The whole thing is a horrifying disgrace.

    Thumb up 2

  10. TxAg94

    Yeah, I would assume Muslims observing a holiday would do so just the same as a Catholic, atheist, Holy Spaghetti Monster worshiper.  Why is this even a separate news story?  Why WOULDN’T they help?

    It’s been made clear to me that they’re involved in a death-cult. So worth noting for sure.

    Surely you’re smarter than that.  You sure think you are.  I really don’t think, despite the bluster and disagreements, that we have anyone here who really thinks what you said above.  I know there are a lot of blanket statements made in the midst of heated debate but I’m pretty sure even the worst offenders know the difference between “the vast majority of Muslims” and the lunatics.  You’re probably right in that some stretch the death cult thing to Islam as a whole for the same reason you and other liberals generalize everyone who doesn’t vote for the chosen Democrat as a violent racist.  It’s a lazy way of “winning” an argument.  Most people realize it’s not worth the effort to respond and walk away, which isn’t necessarily “winning”.  It’s tiring.

    Go ahead and spend the afternoon pulling up old quotes and throwing them back at me.  On the face of it you’ll find just the right ones to support your statement.  But I think you all too often show not only a lack of respect for the others who comment here (not that you’re alone in that) but even a contempt.  What I can’t figure out is why you bother with us, then.  Man, do you really not have anything better to do than argue with people you clearly think are too stupid to even understand your point of view?  I suspect most of have wives for that.  Who am I kidding, my wife is picking me up in a few minutes to go get pizza and go to the shooting range!  And no, we won’t be shooting at Korans or even a photo of Hillary.

    Thumb up 0

  11. CM

    you……generalize everyone who doesn’t vote for the chosen Democrat as a violent racist.

    Yeah you probably need to have one of two examples of me doing that ready before throwing that sort of shit out.

    Wow, CM, I feel like you’re trying to say that you believe your government is tyrannical (at least the part with an “R” by their names) and deserving of being shot.

    Surely you’re smarter than that.  

    Thumb up 1

  12. AlexInCT *

    OK. You’re just trolling at this point.  You don’t have any legitimate points to make.  I’m done arguing with your bullshit.

    Says the lib that cant admit he is one? No skin off my back dude. I stand by my point even if you don’t like it.

    Thumb up 0

  13. stogy

    Yeah, I would assume Muslims observing a holiday would do so just the same as a Catholic, atheist, Holy Spaghetti Monster worshiper.  Why is this even a separate news story?  Why WOULDN’T they help?

    In the attack that just happened in North London, the local Imam just stopped angry members of his community from tearing apart one of the men driving the van. Had you been there and watched members of your community mown down in what was most likely an anti-Muslim terrorist attack, would you have been one of the mob or right there standing alongside the Imam?

     

    Imam ‘protected van driver until police arrived’

    Witnesses have told Sky News that an imam from the mosque protected the driver of the van from angry members of the public until the police could arrive.
    That account seems to chime with the statement from the Muslim Welfare House that thanks imam Mohammed Mahmoud “whose bravery and courage helped calm the immediate situation after the incident and prevented further injury and loss of life”.

    Thumb up 1

  14. CM

    Apparently that’s not important, you shouldn’t even mention it.

    Yet another exception to Alex’s “practically all”. Well, until Alex finds on some nut job site that this was intentional to get sympathy for Muslims and tries to sell it here.

    Thumb up 1

  15. AlexInCT *

    Historian: Americans 13 times more likely to be killed by left-wing terrorist than right-wing one.

    Add in the religion of peace, and the odds are so fucking high that the chance any of these right wing boogymen the left tells us are the number one threat to Americans, drops to negligible. But hey, our resident douchebags are going to keep at it and act as if the left isn’t responsible for mass murder. The fact that their religion murdered over 120 million people and enslaved billions in misery in less than a century of effort, gets ignored or excused. And they argue hard with anyone that dares to point out that fascism is another form of collectivism too. Just like they did here when I pointed out the obvious.

    Shit, and the left wonders why people think they are lying cunts.

    Thumb up 0

  16. AlexInCT *

    No it doesn’t and that is because the guy that did the stabbing was not right wing despite the attempts to paint him as such.

    Thumb up 0

  17. ilovecress

    Yeah, it is a mystery as to whether he’s a lefty or a righty..

    A video camera inside a patrol car captured Christian saying, “I just stabbed a bunch of (expletive) in their neck. … I can die in prison a happy man,” the affidavit said. He said one of the men on the train kept resisting him, despite his threats. “That’s what liberalism gets you,” Christian said.

    Thumb up 1

  18. stogy

    Hmmm…. Alex, have a look at the long list of terrorist-related incidents in Appendix 2 of this report on “Countering Violent Extremism” from the US Government Accountability Office. You might also note the conclusions:

     

    While the September 11, 2001, attacks were perpetrated by foreign violent extremists, from September 12, 2001 through December 31, 2016, attacks by domestic or “homegrown” violent extremists in the United States resulted in 225 fatalities, according to the ECDB. Of these, 106 were killed by far right violent extremists in 62 separate incidents, and 119 were victims of radical Islamist violent extremists in 23 separate incidents. Figure 1 shows the locations and number of fatalities involved in these incidents. A detailed list of the incidents can be found in appendix II. According to the ECDB, activities of far left wing violent extremist groups did not result in any fatalities during this period. 

    It does cover a different period (although it overlaps in 2016) with your “Historian,” and I concede that there have been left-wing incidents since this time. But based on a broader look at the data it would be really hard to conclude that you have a 13 times greater chance of dying from left-wing extremism. In fact, the data overwhelmingly leans the opposite way. Focusing only on the last year or so and redefining most of the right wing perpetrators as “not right wing” would be the only way that you could end up with such a spurious conclusion.

    Looking at the Historian’s webpage on this, it appears that he has added the Portland attacker to the “leftist” list because he once expressed some support for Bernie Sanders, yet Jeremy Joseph Christian also posted death threats against Hillary Clinton, and said that if Trump was the next Hitler, he would sign up for Trump’s SS to end the “monotheist question.” Defining a nutter  like this as a “leftist” is an excellent example of massaging data to come up with a conclusion that suits your agenda. Likewise, defining the Dallas police shooter and Fresno attacker as left-wing, when his views are clearly black nationalist would also be a bit of a stretch – something your author acknowledges but goes on to do anyway.

    Anyone would think that you have simply chosen this story because it matches your own political leanings rather than its ability to present the facts dispassionately and logically. But that would hardly match your character or previous record on such topics, would it?

    Thumb up 2

  19. Iconoclast

    Anyone would think that you have simply chosen this story because it matches your own political leanings rather than its ability to present the facts dispassionately and logically.

    How is this not a two-way street?

     

    Thumb up 0

  20. Hal_10000

    Since January of 2016″ is how that report begins that shows 13-times more likely.

    Are.

    You.

    Fucking.

    Kidding.

    Me.

    Try taking a time sample that actually means something.  Like maybe the last twenty years.  I’m down-playing left-wing or Islamic terrorism. But holy fucking shit, you can not narrow your time window like that to “prove” there’s not right wing terrorism.  That would be like me saying, “Well, in April 1995, you were infinitely more likely to be killed by a right wing terrorist than any other”

    Thumb up 0

  21. stogy

    How is this not a two-way street?

    I am a political centrist, as in, I believe in the principles of centrism. Whatever you imagine my position to be probably isn’t what my position actually is.

    Thumb up 0

  22. stogy

    NO, YOU’RE NOT MORE LIKELY TO BE KILLED BY A RIGHT-WING EXTREMIST THAN AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST
    Let the flaming continue……………

    Statistically, you’d almost certainly be right on the money with that claim. But it is quite a bit different from what Alex was claiming above.

    If you’d like to flame you go right ahead. Self-immolation is all the rage, I hear. I’ll just watch, while I quietly file this as another case of Alex failing basic science.

    Thumb up 0

  23. Iconoclast

    Whatever you imagine my position to be probably isn’t what my position actually is.

    Perhaps, but my point is simply that we all tend to post links that support our position, regardless of where we are on the spectrum. That should be obvious. Also obvious is the fact that such links are more effective when factually accurate.

    Thumb up 0

  24. Iconoclast

    If you’d like to flame you go right ahead.

    Thanks, I guess, but my use of the word “continue” should have implied that the flaming seemed to be already in progress, at least from my vantage point.

    Thumb up 0

  25. AlexInCT *

    I am a political centrist, as in, I believe in the principles of centrism.

    OK Stogy, that was one heck of a laugh you gave me there bro. The problem with your kind is that you believe the radical leftist shit you believe in and peddle is actually centrist because you say it is so. That is why psuedo marxist Europeans and collectivism loving tools all think that everyone to the right of Marx is a radical right-wing nut.

    Thumb up 0

  26. AlexInCT *

    Alex has it set up so that no killings would ever be considered ‘right wing’, rendering the whole concept pointless.

    Unlike you morons CM, I actually expect someone to hold right wing beliefs – not to be confused with leftists basically labeling anyone to the right of Marx as a right wing nut – and not to just be accused of that by people that think Marx was (to borrow some words from Stogy), a centrist.

    Thumb up 0

Leave a Reply