You can’t make this level of idiocy up, man

On this day where the collectivists celebrate the triumph of their murderous ideology – over 120 million killed and billions imprisoned in hell – there is bound to be so much stupidity making rounds that one would feel lost trying to find what to deal with, but then you run into gems like this one:

In an interview with “The New Yorker Radio Hour” broadcast over the weekend, CNN president Jeff Zucker derided Fox News as a propaganda outlet for the Trump administration, while claiming his own network was the only cable news outlet broadcasting “the truth.”

Asked for his assessment of the cable news landscape in the era of President Trump, Zucker began his reply by saying: “Obviously Fox News is, uh,” then paused for more than 11 seconds. “So, look, there’s three cable news networks. Certainly in primetime and in the morning, Fox is state-run TV and is extolling the line out of the White House.”

A spokeswoman for Fox did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The people that spent 8 years sucking Obama’s cock, then all but sold their dignity to try and push a lame and corrupt woman whose accomplishments all are negative unless they are whitewashed or made up whole cloth, over the finish line, now suddenly feel the game is rigged?

This is the response Fox News should give these idiots:

Here is the LSM projecting on others

Here is the LSM projecting on others

15 comments:

  1. CM

    I’ve been kind of inclined to think the whole narcissistic personality disorder accusations were closing in on conspiracy theory level, but I think we can in the very least say that whenever he says “nobody knew” or “nobody ever asks” what he’s acknowledging is he never knew, or he never asked or thought about, and is discovering these things for the first time, and truly doesn’t believe anyone before him ever thought about the things he’s shitting through his mouth about.

    Thumb up 1

  2. Starving Writer

    Meanwhile, in the last week alone, Trump has made these statements:

     

    Regarding the US Constitution and its system of checks and balances:   “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”

     

    Regarding the U.S. Civil War:  “People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why?” 

     

    Regarding Andrew “Trail of Tears” Jackson in a tweet:  “President Andrew Jackson, who died 16 years before the Civil War started, saw it coming and was angry. Would never have let it happen!”

     

    I mean, I get that the Democrats suck.  I truly do.  But why the hell are Republicans doubling down on the dumb that is Trump?  Isn’t the fact that this idiot is the so-called “leader of the free world” far more worrisome than what a bunch of hippies think about a date that very few Americans even celebrate?

    Thumb up 2

  3. Iconoclast

    Regarding the US Constitution and its system of checks and balances:   “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”

    Well, actually, Trump was talking about Senate rules in particular, not the Constitution, per se.  But yeah, many hard-left sources did indeed spin his remarks as being about the Constitution itself.  Gotta make Trump look as stupid and evil as possible, after all…..

    Trump On Senate: “A Very Rough System,” “An Archaic System” That’s “A Bad Thing For The Country”

    “The rules of the Senate and some of the things you have to go through, it’s — it’s really a bad thing for the country, in my opinion,” the president said. “They’re archaic rules.”

    Thumb up 0

  4. Starving Writer

    And what Senate rules, specifically, does Trump consider to be so anarchic and a bad thing for the country?  Please do elaborate.

    Thumb up 2

  5. Iconoclast

    Why must I “elaborate” on anything?  I have already clarified that Trumps remarks pertain to the Senate rules, and I provided a link to back up my statements.  Read the linked article if you need “elaboration”.  Or consult Google, making sure you stipulate “Senate Rules” to filter out the leftist misrepresentations.

    Thumb up 3

  6. AlexInCT *

    At least idiots this tool are dropping the pretense and showing how pissed off that people they look down upon and consider deplorable, beat them when they were sure they were invincible. Can you imagine if anyone had reacted like this spoiled brats are reacting now about Obama’s win what the howling and accusations would be like? Can you imagine Romney or that douchebag McCain complaining about the election being rigged – and after the media dropped their masks and whomever hacked the DNC servers and showed us how corrupt these people were, have no doubt the Obama elections were rigged by the standards they use today to pretend Trump stole it – and whining like Clinton is doing, and getting positive coverage from the media for it? Or would they have been ridiculed and attacked? These people are downright fucking despicable.

    Then you have our usual douchebag idiots here swallowing the misrepresentation by the false news peddlers about what Trump has said or done, because without that they have nothing to stand on.

    You don’t lower yourself to their level and try to actually debate them with facts Iconoclast. If these cunts actually cared about facts, the truth, and wanted to engage in any kind of real debating, Obama would have never been elected and you wouldn’t get either the stupidity in CM’s diatribe or starving writer just carrying water for the people that deiced to misrepresent what was said – on purpose – to keep the narrative going. Fuck the lot of them. The only reaction that is proper is to ignore them and to enjoy how their insane shit flinging keeps making even more people realize you can’t and shouldn’t compromise with them.

    It’s everyone else’s fault that the corrupt and vile democratic party and the corrupt and vile candidate they peddled didn’t beat a guy they consider to be a clown. And have no doubt that they hate everyone else that isn’t part of that cult for that.

    Without the constant lies an misrepresentation, these people would have no case, and worse, they would have to actually take time to do some thinking of why they and the destructive things they believe in and have foisted on us were rejected.

    The establishment is pissed. The leftists in the establishment and the usual leftist tools beholden to the establishment have lost whatever shred of dignity or sanity they might have once had. Trump is like a case of penicillin to their venereal disease: it fucking drives them to death.

    Enjoy their misery and their stupid lashing out. Rub it in. That’s all they deserve.

    Thumb up 0

  7. Iconoclast

    I see that Starving Writer got two thumbs up for doing nothing more than moving the goal posts. Pitiful, but not surprising. Kind of illustrates Alex’ point.

    Thumb up 0

  8. CM

    You guys are sure doing an amazing job “holding him to account”. There’s so much of it I can’t keep up with it all.

    Oh that’s right, someone probably got a job somewhere (lots happening in Mar-a-lago), so no need. Also, those emails.

    Thumb up 1

  9. CM

    I see that Starving Writer got two thumbs up for doing nothing more than moving the goal posts. Pitiful, but not surprising. 

    Not nearly as unsurprising as your blatant misrepresentation. ‘Nothing more than’? It was one example of three given. Is this another one of your ‘alternative facts’?

    Thumb up 0

  10. CM

    Trump, and the active support and defence of him, is the ultimate ongoing firm proof that almost everything Obama got abused for was pure partisanship and idiocy. Even when the inevitable “i know you are you said you are but what am i” response comes shitting in, it’ll only prove it.

    Thumb up 1

  11. Iconoclast

    Not nearly as unsurprising as your blatant misrepresentation. ‘Nothing more than’? It was one example of three given. Is this another one of your ‘alternative facts’?

    Clearly, I was referring to his response to my correction of his misrepresentation.  If you weren’t such a moron, you’d have figured that out.  He claimed that Trump was talking about the Constitution, I corrected him, telling him Trump  was referring to the Senate rules.  His response to that was clearly a case of moving goal posts, and his response contained nothing more than that.

    Moron.

    Also, given that I only “defended” one out of three items Starving Writer originally brought up, it’s asinine to imply that I “defend” everything Trump says.  Misrepresenting what he says utterly fails to qualify as “holding him to account”.

    Thumb up 0

  12. Iconoclast

    And what’s all this “hold him to account” nonsense, anyway?  Hal has been quite critical of Trump, and I personally never made any promises about “holding him to account”.  As I recall, the only thing I cared about was SCOTUS appointments, and Trump has come through on that one.  Otherwise, I recall lamenting that neither choice was worth a shit, and the SCOTUS issue was the only thing giving Trump even a slight edge.

    If Trump somehow manages to get anything else right (like firing missiles into Syria, getting widespread praise for that, your forthcoming denials notwithstanding), that’s just gravy.  But otherwise, yeah, I am already on record as wishing Trump would shut the hell up.

    Thumb up 0

  13. Iconoclast

    (lots happening in Mar-a-lago)

    Well, yeah, Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping there and they discussed North Korea.  Also, while Trump was hosting the Chinese leader, he ordered the missile attack on the Syrian base.  The Chinese President may have taken notice of that…..

    Also, those emails.

    This is leftist code for, “I Got Nuthin'”.

     

    Thumb up 1

  14. Starving Writer

    Iconoclast,

    I read the link you provided.  Trump says that Senate and House rules are archaic and the things he has to go through are “bad for our country.”

    So what rules, exactly, is Trump talking about?  What, exactly, does Trump need to go through that is “bad for our country”?

    Leftists have interpreted this to mean that Trump is frustrated he has to go through Senate and the House to impose his actions — in other words, he’s frustrated at the separation of powers — and he sees the rules designed to keep powers separate as archaic and bad for our country.

    What, exactly, is your interpretation of Trump’s comments? What Senate rules is archaic and is bad for our country? Because Trump sure as hell didn’t point out any specific rules.  He basically says “Senate sucks because they won’t let me do whatever I want.”

    Thumb up 1

  15. Iconoclast

    So what rules, exactly, is Trump talking about?

    I have read the “Face the Nation” transcript, and it doesn’t appear that Trump got into specific rules.  He started complaining about how obstructionist the Democrats were and then Dickerson steered the interview toward health care before any specific rules were ever mentioned.

    Leftists have interpreted this to mean that Trump is frustrated he has to go through Senate and the House to impose his actions — in other words, he’s frustrated at the separation of powers……

    Of course they do, but then, Obama went around calling the Republicans “The Party of ‘No'” because of their lack of cooperation.  I don’t recall the MSM jumping to the stupid conclusion that Obama was a Nazi authoritarian who hated the Constitution.  No, such honors are reserved for Republican Presidents, it appears.

     He basically says “Senate sucks because they won’t let me do whatever I want.”

    Just like Obama did, but the MSM got all tingly over Obama.  Go figure.

    Thumb up 2

Leave a Reply