Manning to Go Free

I’m actually shocked:

President Barack Obama on Tuesday commuted the sentence of Chelsea Manning, who was convicted of stealing and disseminating 750,000 pages of documents and videos to WikiLeaks.

The President also pardoned James Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, who pleaded guilty in October to a single charge of making false statements to federal investigators in 2012 when he was questioned about leaking top secret information on US efforts to cripple Iran’s nuclear program to two journalists.

A presidential commutation reduces the sentence being served but it does not change the fact of conviction, whereas a pardon forgives a certain criminal offense.

Manning, a transgender woman and former US Army soldier, was serving a 35-year sentence at Fort Leavenworth, an all-male Army prison in eastern Kansas, despite her request to transfer to a civilian prison. A White House statement on Tuesday said her prison sentence is set to expire on May 17.

The material, which WikiLeaks published in 2010, included a classified video of a US helicopter attacking civilians and journalists in Iraq in 2007. Labeled “Collateral Murder,” the film drew criticism from human rights activists for the deaths of innocent people.

Though found guilty on 20 out of 22 possible charges (including violating the US Espionage Act), Manning was not convicted of the most serious one; aiding the enemy, which could have earned the private a life sentence.
Instead, the former intelligence analyst was sentenced to prison, as well as demoted from private first class to private and dishonorably discharged.

Manning was in solitary for no apparent reason and was having problems (e.g., two suicide attempts). But this is honestly surprising. I know the intelligence community was vehemently opposed. Obama has been commuting a lot of sentences for drug dealers and such, which I don’t really have a problem with. But this is the biggest one yet.

I’ll have to think about this one a bit though. Manning’s leaks crossed me as less defensible than Snowden’s. Snowden, at least, was revealing NSA malfeasance and civil liberties violations, even if one disagrees with the manner in which he revealed them. Manning’s leaks seemed more motivated at embarrassing the military and political leadership than anything else (e.g., Cablegate, which revealed diplomatically embarrassing discussions but no actual scandals).

So why has Obama pardoned Manning and not Snowden? I suspect because Manning undermined Bush and Snowden undermined Obama. We’ve seen this kind of partisan bullshit with Wikileaks. Republicans who denounced it when Manning was releasing info praised it when it released the DNC’s e-mails. And Democrats who praised Wikileaks when it was humiliating Bush denounced it when it humiliated Clinton. My stance on Wikileaks evolved a bit in the early days (as you’ll see in the link below) but solidified by the end of the Bush years. While I appreciate the efforts to reveal lawbreaking and civil liberties violations, I do not trust this messenger. Assange does not have our interests at heart and the information he has revealed has generally not benefitted us or the world. Quite the contrary.

As an example, I wrote a long blog many years ago on the “collateral murder” video. I disagreed with Wikileaks editorializing of the video, seeing it more as a tragic accident than the deliberate targeting of civilians. And be sure to click through to letters from Andrew Sullivan’s readers who go into the context of the video.

Anyway, Manning is going free and I’m happy for her, I guess. But I’m very surprised and baffled by this. I really didn’t expect it.

Comments are closed.

  1. AlexInCT

    Not to mention that his leaks did put intelligence people in danger and likely got people killed WVR. I am not surprised Obama commuted his sentence: it is great politically for grievance peddlers. Now Snowden, he deserves a pardon for doing the American people a service, but I doubt he gets that.

    Thumb up 0

  2. Hal_10000 *

    Wikileaks released unredacted documents with names of US sources on them.  We don’t KNOW that anyone was killed because of it, but it was horribly reckless.

    I don’t blame Manning as much as I do Assange. I can be generous and think Manning thought she was doing the nation a service and revealing bad stuff (e.g., the Iraqi government torture thing).  But I can not be generous to Assange, who not only released info but editorialized it to make the US look as bad as possible.

    Thumb up 1

  3. stogy

    Manning’s long history of mental illness – plus what amounted to cruel and unusual punishment – makes this a decent humanitarian decision.

    Thumb up 2

  4. grady

    It was reported that Assange had said he would cooperate with the extradition process if Manning was freed.  Obama was ticked at what Assange had done and wanted him to face charges.  Is that the sole motivation, or is the humanitarian aspect a part, or the majority of the motivation?

    I do admit that I like it when the untouchables in the elite have their dirty laundry exposed.  We should all accept when the truth of our actions in life come out.  The extent of negative impact and when the truth is shaded for effect is when the valid arguments against exposure have weight.

    Thumb up 0