Analysis: True

Donald Trump got that right

Donald Trump got that right

Hate him, like him, or like me, vote against Hillary, the appeal he has makes sense when he points things like this out despite the democrat operatives with bylines trying to elect their boss.

Comments are closed.

  1. RonK

    you generalize it even more, anything a republican says, does, or is involved with gets way more scrutiny  than a democrat.

    Thumb up 0

  2. AlexInCT *

    It goes beyond scrutiny. The fucking scumbags will ignore and even lie to help democrats, while actually making up shit to hurt the other side, And it is not a recent phenomenon. These days the DNC operatives with bylines are just uinclined to expend any kind of effort to hide what they are doing.  When you believe people are just plain stupid or so beholden to your team that the truth don’t matter, you end up with today’s left. It is like these fuckers took “1984” and “Brave New World”, and instead of looking at them as warnings of how bad things can get when people claiming they have good intentions actually cut loose, decided to use them as instruction manuals.

    Thumb up 0

  3. AlexInCT *

    “This despising of the press is always a part of neo-fascist rhetoric.”

    Fascism, like communism, is a disease of the left. In both systems the press is an organ of the all powerful state, meaning the elite that pretend to hold all the power and make the life and death decisions for the good of others, and has as its primary function the selling of lies. That you actually have the temerity to say that the people that have pointed out that the press actually acts like one that is already beholden to their communist or fascist masters are the the ones motivated by fascism, is just staggering in its idiocy. Of course, the left has spend close to 8 decades now trying to convince people fascism isn’t leftist, and then used the accusation of being a fascist to shut down any kind of discussion of its failures. Like you did right here. When you are a corrupt entity serving as the mouthpiece of the corrupt and criminal master class, you shouldn’t get bent out of shape when that gets pointed out as to why you lack credibility.

    The Post editorial nails it. Trump is for those who think themselves as victims.

    Right, the problem isn’t that the people in charge have failed those that elected them and that our leadership basically now is comprised of corrupt, craven, and inept, ineffectual, and is downright destroying the creation of their betters, so those that elected them are now basically saying no more: it is that the peasants can’t see that the crooks, liars, and criminals in charge know what is best, and are getting uppity!

    How dare they not just shut the fuck up and grab their ankles when their betters tell them to take another ass reaming because their betters know that is what is best for them! Let them eat cake! How dare they stand up to their betters.

    Thumb up 0

  4. CM

    So your guy’s political opponent should be jailed, and you’re now promoting an actual ‘enemies’ list. Brilliant.

    Thumb up 0

  5. CM

    Trump is offering precisely zero solutions to any of those concerns. He is playing the ‘strongman’. He will just sort it out through his inherent ‘power’. Despite having a personal history of being corrupt, craven, and inept, ineffectual, and downright destroying others. Despite seven and a half years of people like you foaming at the mouth about Obama’s cult of personality or his lawlessness you’re now signing up to a guy that promises significantly more of both. This all goes to clearly show that it has been ODS all along, and now Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

    Thumb up 0

  6. CM

    You also make an ongoing argument that liberals rely on emotion (despite you being easily the one who most relies on emotion here, you must expend a lot of energy here). Did you happen to notice that the entire RNC was based on only feelings and perceptions? Particularly in relation to crimes by immigrants (but more generally how the country is ablaze with violent crime), and how terrible the economy is. That none of it is true is apparently irrelevant (and the fault of the media).

    Thumb up 0

  7. AlexInCT *

    So your guy’s political opponent should be jailed, and you’re now promoting an actual ‘enemies’ list. Brilliant.

    You are too stupid to live. First off Trump is not my guy. Hilary shouldn’t be jailed because she is running against Trump either you fucking moron, but because she broke so many laws. Laws that this very administration used to silence their opposition (speaking of enemies lists). She is a criminal. You are beyond lame.

    Trump is offering precisely zero solutions to any of those concerns. 

    Says who? People like you that are beholden to the failed  collectivist agenda that are responsible for the problems in the first place? And even if it was true that Trump wasn’t offering any solutions at all, the fact that the opposition is basically a criminal offering more of the same failed policies under the guise of free shit, is far worse, and good enough reason to vote for anyone else. At this point I would vote for Charles Manson over another fucking establishment whore.

    BTW moron, all these bad things you and people like you are projecting on Trump, saying he will be doing, are the very things Obama has already been doing, and you have been defending him for doing. Now Hillary, a crook comes along and promises to not just double down on the corruption and stank, but to basically turn the country into Nazi Germany, and fucks like you are here acting is if that isn’t a problem.

    Seriously CM, nobody does more to show how corrupt the left is than you. Keep posting. The more people like you say the dumb shit you do about Trump, while ignoring all the illegal and criminal shit that Hillary has already done, and then pretending the one that will do it will be Trump if he wins, the better the odds are Hillary will go down in the flames she deserves. It is pathetic that people like you are so desperate to have a criminal win an election, to keep your failed ideology alive of all things, that you have to resort to hiding that person while erecting straw men to attack the other guy.

    You also make an ongoing argument that liberals rely on emotion (despite you being easily the one who most relies on emotion here, you must expend a lot of energy here).

    That was good for a laugh. The only emotion I have is contempt for the vileness of what you believe in. The rest of it is you moving goal posts and deflecting, and then acting as if you were actually interested in having a real argument.

    Did you happen to notice that the entire RNC was based on only feelings and perceptions?

    Didn’t watch any of that. I don’t care what these people have to say. I already was very clear that I was voting <b>against</b> the corrupt status quo, a brazen criminal that shows all the tendencies of a true fascist, and because I can’t think anyone more dangerous, inept, and disqualified from the job than Hilary Clinton. How about you stop trying to convince me how bad Trump is – I don’t care – and try to refute the fact that Clinton is a criminal and a despicable person that should actually be in jail, not running for the highest office on the planet.

    Particularly in relation to crimes by immigrants 

    You mean crimes by illegal aliens right? People that broke the fucking law – yet another one this administration enforced at its convenience only against those it viewed as its enemies – coming here? Because wile you would like to blur the lines to pretend there is no difference, there is a huge on.

    That none of it is true is apparently irrelevant 

    You are a blatant fucking liar, but what’s new? This is exactly what I was talking about above. You are not trying to have a debate. You lie, ignore what you don’t like or want to have talked about, lie even more, and then act hurt when called on it. No wonder you are actually championing Clinton’s cause and constantly defend Obama. You are all the same sort of lowlifes.

    Thumb up 0

  8. CM

    You are too stupid to live. 

    Well I’m alive so you’re also wrong about that.

    First off Trump is not my guy.

    You seem to have said plenty of positive things about him. So you won’t be voting for him then?

    Hilary shouldn’t be jailed because she is running against Trump either you fucking moron, but because she broke so many laws.

    I’m sure that’s what all tinpot dictators and their supporters say about their political opponents. In a democracy we don’t usually descend into those murky depths. Which is why Obama didn’t push for dealing with the Iraq invasion. Also, this isn’t something to be seen in isolation – you add it to the proposed control of the media, to a promised purge on Day 1 and many other tools of the ‘strongman’ dictator trade.

    She is a criminal. 

    By that measure so are Bush and Cheney. See the problem when you can’t restraint yourself?

    Says who?

    Says Trump.

    People like you that are beholden to the failed  collectivist agenda that are responsible for the problems in the first place?

    Nope, I couldn’t be more irrelevant to his complete lack of solutions.

    And even if it was true that Trump wasn’t offering any solutions at all, the fact that the opposition is basically a criminal offering more of the same failed policies under the guise of free shit, is far worse, and good enough reason to vote for anyone else. 

    And yet you’re absolutely unwilling or unable to extend that same courtesy to anyone else, as I pointed out. Trump is offering loads of free shit too though, did you not realise that? He’s promising to bring in far less money and spend more. For someone who has made a big deal out of the deficit and overall level of debt, I thought that might be something you’d have picked up on.

    At this point I would vote for Charles Manson over another fucking establishment whore.

    And that would make you completely deranged.

    all these bad things you and people like you are projecting on Trump, saying he will be doing, are the very things Obama has already been doing, and you have been defending him for doing

    Yeah I don’t think so – (a) Obama hasn’t, and (b) I haven’t been defending him for doing so. If you think I’m wrong, then provide some specific examples.

    but to basically turn the country into Nazi Germany

    Exactly what would she do to turn it into that? (Ignoring that Trump and said many things that mirror fascism).

     Seriously CM, nobody does more to show how corrupt the left is than you.

    When have I ever advocated corruption? Never.

    But you’re the worst advert for conservatism I think I’ve ever come across.

    Keep posting. The more people like you say the dumb shit you do about Trump

    Like what? Observing that he’s not actually providing any solutions to the issues that people are apparently railing against? Riiiight.

    pretending the one that will do it will be Trump if he wins

    He’s SAID he will do all these things that have been mentioned. The Post editorial also goes through what he HAS DONE in the past.

    It is pathetic that people like you are so desperate to have a criminal win an election

    No desperation here. You’re the one ranting and raving and throwing abuse around like an emotional desperate person.

    to keep your failed ideology alive of all things

    Here we go. You’re completely unhinged. I don’t have an iedology. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve argued AGAINST ideology. You moron!

    that you have to resort to hiding that person while erecting straw men to attack the other guy

    I’ve hid Hillary? Hahahaha. Brilliant. And no straw men are required, Trump says and does it all himself.

    The only emotion I have is contempt for the vileness of what you believe in.

    Except what you pretend I believe in it’s even remotely accurate, which makes it even more ridiculous that you waste so much effort and emotion. But without me you’d still be spitting all over the place and wailing and carrying on.

    Didn’t watch any of that.

    Then how can you be commenting on this?

    and because I can’t think anyone more dangerous, inept, and disqualified from the job than Hilary Clinton

    Yes, you’re deranged. We’ve established that.

    How about you stop trying to convince me how bad Trump is

    I’ve simply been illustrating what a massive hypocrite you are Alex.

    No wonder you are actually championing Clinton’s cause

    Derangement.

    Thumb up 0

  9. AlexInCT *

    Well I’m alive so you’re also wrong about that.

    No, I am absolutely right. Your existence is because people better than you do the necessary things to prevent your stupidity from costing you and others like you your own lives, and the sad part about it is that you aren’t even smart enough to see that or be thankful. But that is liberalism in a nutshell.

    Derangement.

    You mean deflection on your part right? Because that is all you have done. Actually that isn’t true: you have also worked real hard to avoid being honest that you do want Clinton to win and are just fine with the fact that she is what she is because you seem to think it benefits your agenda and ideology.

    Thumb up 0

  10. CM

     Your existence is because people better than you do the necessary things to prevent your stupidity from costing you and others like you your own lives

    Such as what? What are they better than me at? Invading Iraq and unleashing a generation of chaos on the world?

    Actually that isn’t true: you have also worked real hard to avoid being honest that you do want Clinton to win and are just fine with the fact that she is what she is because you seem to think it benefits your agenda and ideology.

    Like any rational and sane person, I don’t want Trump to be anywhere near power. By all accounts Clinton will essentially be business as usual, which is a lot better than Trump. As dislikable as Hillary is (and she is very dislikable). But I have the luxury of not having to make a decision though, and so by default I would prefer Hillary over Trump.

    You have the responsibility to make a decision. Will you be voting for Trump? Or pretending that your only other choice is voting for Hillary?

    If it makes no difference in your state, your vote for Trump will be doing nothing to assist Hillary. It will instead be a positive vote for what Trump has said he’ll do, and the person he is. From what I’ve read and seen of Trump, that would be a reasonably good fit for you. And it will be a strong indication that most of what you emotionally scream about every day here like a child isn’t in fact what you believe at all (thou dost protest too much?).

    Thumb up 0

  11. AlexInCT *

    Such as what? What are they better than me at?

    Producing the wealth you want to steal in the name of social justice, for one.

    Invading Iraq and unleashing a generation of chaos on the world?

    The only thing your idiotic statement misses is the accusation that Boosh was also behind 911 so he could go start this chaos, because after all Bin Laden and the people that tell the West they are at war with us never would have done what they are doing now if we had just given in to them and what they wanted, right? Where did you get this brilliant insight BTW? From the Clinton campaign and the people that want “business as usual”? Here is some advice to you buddy: the chaos we have today is happening because of the “business as usual” types.

    I also redirect you to my exchange with you in the “Finally Some Theater” thread. That question about Boosh? QED.

    Like any rational and sane person, I don’t want Trump to be anywhere near power.

    Except that means you let Clinton, a proven criminal, murderer, and shyster in power? You don’t think Trump is sane, but Hillary, whom has sold this country out for power and wealth you are OK with? Yeah, you are being both reasonable and honest here, I am sure. Glad to see that you are far more worried about fantasies and bullshit than someone proven to be a dangerous criminal.

    By all accounts Clinton will essentially be business as usual, which is a lot better than Trump. 

    By all accounts from whom, pray tell? And by business as usual you mean they will sell the country to the highest bidder right? Or do you mean more of Obama? Because both of those have worked so well for anybody but them. Can you stop your dancing around and simply state that you think as long as the left is in power, no matter how corrupt or destructive what they do is, that is “business as usual” for you ,and that is fine?

    As dislikable as Hillary is (and she is very dislikable).

    Dislikable? Seriously? And you claim not to be carrying water for her? She is a a scumbag criminal! One that has allowed others to die to hide her corruption, enrich herself, or to increase or keep her hold on power. This woman isn’t qualified to be in charge of a lemonade stand, let alone the presidency, and you call this dislibable? I see Hillary’s appeal to you now: you share the same morality (none).

    Thumb up 0

  12. CM

    Producing the wealth you want to steal in the name of social justice, for one.

    I produce wealth and have done since I was 13. I’ve owned a company and am about start a business. I’ve paid off my mortgage. As an adult I’ve never received any state support. I’ve paid far far far more into the system than I have taken out. So please explain which wealth have I stolen in the name of social justice?

    The only thing your idiotic statement misses is the accusation that Boosh was also behind 911 so he could go start this chaos, because after all Bin Laden and the people that tell the West they are at war with us never would have done what they are doing now if we had just given in to them and what they wanted, right?

    Iraq wasn’t involved in 911. Not invading Iraq wouldn’t be “giving in” to terrorists, that is ludicrous. It’s more accurate to say that the invasion was giving in to those who want chaos and want to fight the West in the Middle East.

    Except that means you let Clinton, a proven criminal, murderer, and shyster in power? 

    No, it means I don’t believe Trump should be anywhere near power. It’s possible to have an opinion on Person A without considering Person B. Yes in reality if Trump doesn’t win that means Clinton is President, but that’s not the same as making a value judgement about whether Clinton would be a good President. I’m not and have never been a ‘fan’ of Clinton. She seems like most other politicians – opportunistic, cynical, untrustworthy. And she’s unlikeable. Unforuntatley you’re already falling into the same trap as you did with Obama though – by going unhinged you’re counting yourself from being taken even remotely seriously when she does things that justify criticism (assuming she wins of course).

    You don’t think Trump is sane

    I never said he was insane. He’s a very strange man, but I have no doubt that he’s ‘sane’. Perhaps if you stopped making shit up all the time this whole thing would be easier for you? You do realise that the group you consider your ‘enemy’ isn’t just one homogeneous group, right? No, of course you don’t, otherwise you wouldn’t keep posting as if they were.

    By all accounts from whom, pray tell?

    By what I’ve seen and read across a variety of sources. Not just hard-core conspiracy or partisan blogs.

    And by business as usual you mean they will sell the country to the highest bidder right? Or do you mean more of Obama?

    More of Obama I would suggest.

    Because both of those have worked so well for anybody but them. 

    As Obama has a good approval rating clearly he’s ‘worked out’ for a lot of people yeah.

    Can you stop your dancing around and simply state that you think as long as the left is in power, no matter how corrupt or destructive what they do is, that is “business as usual” for you ,and that is fine?

    Ah, no, because I don’t believe that at all.

    Dislikable? Seriously? 

    Seriously. That is seriously my opinion.

    And you claim not to be carrying water for her? 

    I’m carrying water for her because I said she was very dislikeable? Sorry, that makes no sense Alex. Again, are you relying on making shit up again?

     

     

    Thumb up 0

  13. AlexInCT *

    I produce wealth and have done since I was 13. I’ve owned a company and am about start a business. I’ve paid off my mortgage. As an adult I’ve never received any state support. I’ve paid far far far more into the system than I have taken out. So please explain which wealth have I stolen in the name of social justice?

    I call bullshit. Leftists are notorious for inflating their resumes to avoid the obvious. I have not seen anyone more beholden to the politics of envy and greed than you here.

    Iraq wasn’t involved in 911. Not invading Iraq wouldn’t be “giving in” to terrorists, that is ludicrous. It’s more accurate to say that the invasion was giving in to those who want chaos and want to fight the West in the Middle East.

    Really? Then you better backtrack your support for Clinton. Not only did she vote for it: she first made excuses, then kind of got caught trying to imply her vote was bought. Someone like this sure as hell is going to be chaos.

    No, it means I don’t believe Trump should be anywhere near power.

    But Clinton is OK? The same Clinton you accuse of being part of the chaos cabal, and the one that has shown her hand as a manipulator and criminal that fancies herself above the law the rest of us are held to? You will pardon me for again mentioning that if it wasn’t for double standards people like you have none.

    I’m carrying water for her because I said she was very dislikeable?

    Now your just showing your pedantic nature again. No, you are carrying water for her because with a record like hers the worst you can call her is dislikeable. You seem to have no problem saying Trump is a madman, but Hillary, with a proven criminal record and the lowest character, she is just “very dislikeable”. Yeah, I think Pol Pot was dislikeable too. Wink, wink…

    Thumb up 0

  14. CM

    I call bullshit.

    Of course you do, because you’re unable to comprehend anything other than ones and zeros, as you continually demonstrate. You have no choice but to just disbelieve me. This is the sorry state you’ve got yourself into.

    I have not seen anyone more beholden to the politics of envy and greed than you here.

    Of course.

    Then you better backtrack your support for Clinton

    The support I never gave…..good one.

    I would say that at least she admitted she got it wrong, but then I’m assuming that was a carefully calculated mea culpa (she’d gain more than she’d lose, so it was worth doing, rather than being geniune).

    But Clinton is OK? 

    My opinion about Trump says nothing about whether Clinton is “OK” or not.

    You will pardon me for again mentioning that if it wasn’t for double standards people like you have none.

    Again, that relies on the shit you’ve invented about me actively supporting Clinton. I don’t and never have, no matter how much you keep repeating what you’ve invented. If I were American the only way I’d vote for her would be if I was in a swing state, and then I’d be voting to stop Trump from winning the state.

    It’s ironic that you want to talk about ‘standards’ given how much you rely on making shit up and don’t even care to try to hide it.

    Now your just showing your pedantic nature again.

    No, that’s you making more shit up again and inferring that because I said she was dislikeable, that must constitute the entirety of my opinion about her. I do seriously think she is unlikeable, as opposed to likeable. Seriously.

    You seem to have no problem saying Trump is a madman

    I never said he was a ‘madman’. Yet again, you’re making shit up. I never said he was insane. He’s a very strange man, but I have no doubt that he’s ‘sane’. 

    I guess the other right-wingers here are carrying water for her too because they haven’t called her a murderer and proven criminal right? (I thought to be a proven criminal you actually had to be found guilty, otherwise how are you different to anyone who calls Bush or Blair the same?)

    Thumb up 0

  15. AlexInCT *

    Of course you do, because you’re unable to comprehend anything other than ones and zeros, as you continually demonstrate. You have no choice but to just disbelieve me. This is the sorry state you’ve got yourself into.

    Well can you blame me? I have not got anything but your fantasies and your dishonesty to go by, so until proven otherwise, I am going to assume this is more of the same. You did after all, after being pressed to explain why, pointed out that you believed Trump was a crazy and dangerous person you felt should be nowhere near power, while Clinton, a person with an actual track record of abuse of government power , criminal and abusive behavior behavior (read up on her insane tantrums, throwing shit at people and so on), and down right vile behavior and lying, you chose to basically call “very unlikable”. But hey, I am the one with a problem, or not being honest. Heh.

    The support I never gave…..good one.

    What do you call it when you have basically have made the argument Trump should never be near power, on a fucking whim of all things because the guy isn’t a PC cunt, while referring to a person that should be in jail for her criminal behavior and has a rap sheet of despicable and criminal acts as “very unlikable”? Whatever fictitious bad behavior you are now pretending Trump will engage in have already been done by Hillary. But here we are arguing and you are arguing that Hillary is a better choice than Trump. You may want to engage in Clintonesque “what is the mean of the word ‘is”” lawyerese, but people like me see through that and see it for what it is.

    Want to settle this? Just come right out and denounce Clinton as the conniving, deceitful, criminal she is, and say she shouldn’t ever be allowed in office, period. Point out that I am right that she has already done the things the left is now pretending Trump will do. I will shut right up and you will have won an argument for once. I am not holding my breath, though.

    It’s ironic that you want to talk about ‘standards’ given how much you rely on making shit up and don’t even care to try to hide it.

    What did I make up again?

    I never said he was a ‘madman’. Yet again, you’re making shit up. I never said he was insane. He’s a very strange man, but I have no doubt that he’s ‘sane’. 

    So you didn’t post this above:

    Like any rational and sane person, I don’t want Trump to be anywhere near power

    So what then disqualifies Trump in your mind? Seriously. Because anything you would accuse him of having done or doing in the future, Hilary has already done and plans to do more of.

    I guess the other right-wingers here are carrying water for her too because they haven’t called her a murderer and proven criminal right?

    I have seen most of them say just that in one post or another about the evil monster, CM. I will let them know that you need another citation from them that they need to specifically tell you they believe she is a murderer and a criminal.

    Thumb up 0

  16. AlexInCT *

    I just caught you making this statement above CM:

    By that measure so are Bush and Cheney. See the problem when you can’t restraint yourself?

    First off, this is exhibit #2 on the Boosh derangement and attacks. Now to your comment: what measure would that be that would make Boosh and Cheney criminals on par with Hillary, pray tell? Are you saying that Boosh and Cheney got a pass from the media and the democrats, the that constantly hounded them and falsely accused them of criminal behavior of all manner – even when they got approval from congress, went to the UN, dotted every I and crossed every T to do things the right way and had democrats go along with all of it until it became convenient to forget that was how things happened for political gain- if they had really broken so many laws like Clinton did? Really?
    Shit, and you accused me of making stuff up and arguing out of emotion. Priceless.

    Citation please.

    Thumb up 0

  17. CM

    Well can you blame me?

    Yes, stop making shit up. It doesn’t help you. It just makes you look like a nut. As does continually making empty accusations.

    I have not got anything but your fantasies and your dishonesty to go by, so until proven otherwise, I am going to assume this is more of the same. 

    What fantasies have I expressed? What dishonesty? Go on, back it up FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE.

    You did after all, after being pressed to explain why, pointed out that you believed Trump was a crazy and dangerous person you felt should be nowhere near power, while Clinton, a person with an actual track record of abuse of government power , criminal and abusive behavior behavior (read up on her insane tantrums, throwing shit at people and so on), and down right vile behavior and lying, you chose to basically call “very unlikable”.

    So which one was that – a fantasy, or dishonesty? And how?

    But hey, I am the one with a problem

    You appear to have considerable problems, and yet have no interest at all in reducing them.

    What do you call it when you have basically have made the argument Trump should never be near power, on a fucking whim of all things because the guy isn’t a PC cunt, 

    That’s not my argument. Again, stop making shit up. It’s not helping you.

    while referring to a person that should be in jail for her criminal behavior and has a rap sheet of despicable and criminal acts as “very unlikable”? 

    I did refer to her as “dislikeable” but, AGAIN, you have simply inferred far beyond that. And then that becomes your ‘truth’. This is one of your regular problems.

    Whatever fictitious bad behavior you are now pretending Trump will engage in have already been done by Hillary. 

    Such as? ALWAYS short on specifics aren’t you.

    But here we are arguing

    I’m not really arguing. There is nothing to argue against. You’re not being rational, and it’s not possibly to argue against someone who cannot be rational. I’m mostly pointing out how you’re just making shit up, and are clearly deranged with HDS.

    You may want to engage in Clintonesque “what is the mean of the word ‘is”” lawyerese, but people like me see through that and see it for what it is.

    Actually you’re just making shit up, over and over again.

    Want to settle this?

    I don’t see that there is anything to ‘settle’.

    Just come right out and denounce Clinton as the conniving, deceitful, criminal she is, and say she shouldn’t ever be allowed in office, period.

    Sorry I don’t go in for all the emotion-based histrionics that you’re so keen on. I have no doubt that she’s conniving and deceitful, there seems clear evidence of that. As she hasn’t been found guilty of anything she can’t be accurately be called a ‘criminal’, just as Blair and Bush can’t be.

    I will shut right up and you will have won an argument for once.

    Brilliant. Where did you ‘win’ one? I still remember our very first exchange (it was on Keystone) where it turned out you hadn’t even read the document you were talking about. You clearly couldn’t be bothered checking sources, you just promoted nonsense from a partisan blog as ‘the truth’. And nothing has changed since. Actually you’ve gotten worse. Lately you’ve been particularly batshit insane,

    What did I make up again?

    See all the specific examples above where I said that you were making shit up.

    So you didn’t post this above:

    I did post that. That is different to what you are claiming, as usual.

    So what then disqualifies Trump in your mind? 

    Not one thing in particular, far from it. See the Washington Post editorial I posted the link to, it has a good summary with evidenced examples.

    Because anything you would accuse him of having done or doing in the future, Hilary has already done and plans to do more of.

    That’s your narrative. I haven’t seen that shown, even remotely.

    I have seen most of them say just that in one post or another about the evil monster, CM

    You’ve seen them call her a murderer and proven criminal? I don’t think so.

    I will let them know that you need another citation from them that they need to specifically tell you they believe she is a murderer and a criminal.

    Knock yourself out.

    I just caught you making this statement above CM:

    No “catching” required, it was in exactly the same font as the rest.

    First off, this is exhibit #2 on the Boosh derangement and attacks.

    What was Exhibit #1 again?

    How is that evidence of “derangement and attacks”? If you’re saying Clinton is a criminal when she hasn’t been found guilty of anything in court, then where does it end? Anyone can call anyone else (e.g. Bush, Blair) a criminal just because they personally consider themselves to be that. But they run the risk of being seen as a nut. You clearly don’t care.

    went to the UN, dotted every I and crossed every T to do things the right way a

    I used them as an example because they did not get the required UN authorisation. It was far from crossing every T.

    Shit, and you accused me of making stuff up and arguing out of emotion

    What have I made up? Nothing. And I’m not even remotely arguing out of emotion, I’m not ranting and raving like you. I’m perfectly calm thanks.

    Citation please.

    For what? The fact that they didn’t get UN approval? I think that’s widely known. Look it up yourself.

     

     

     

     

     

    Thumb up 0