Croney capitalist billionaire wants to stop others from getting rich like him

Say what you want about Bill gates, but as of late he has turned into a giant bag of dicks. The man that managed to successfully create and hold a incestuous monopolistic relationship with big government that allowed the mega corporation he ran to crush competition and make him a fucking billionaire, now in his old age, is basically trying his best to limit membership to the exclusive he belongs to by asking that the bar that keeps the riff-raff out of the new American aristocracy be raised even more.

Never mind the idiotic fact that the crony capitalism of the last few decades that has all but subverted and destroyed the small business industries that used to keep our overregulated and overburdened economy growing by some miracle, is a direct byproduct of big government socialism he tells us we need more of. He pleads his case by calling of all things on the idiotic and discredited big government booga-boo of climate change.

Seriously? Of course they need socialism to cure climate change, duh! In fact, the people that champion this idiotic cult’s teachings were hoping that they could scare everyone else with their doomsday climate change predictions to get even more oppressive socialism that would otherwise never be acceptable rammed down people’s throats.

Don’t be fooled by these mega rich assholes, like Gates or Buffet, whom for some ungodly reason seem to push anti-capitalist bullshit. They do this for personal gain. They know they have enough power and wealth to keep anyone from taking theirs, and they push for more corrupt government control precisely because it will both benefit them personally while making it possible for them to control whom gets allowed in the credentialed aristocratic circle the left has managed to create in this country.

Capitalism died a long time ago, right about the time government inserted itself in the middle of any business transaction between willing participants, through mechanisms that control entry and protect special interests while pretending to be done to serve the public.

Fuck these assholes and the horse they rode in on. What we really need is a culling of the new aristocracy.

Comments are closed.

  1. richtaylor365

    Gates is right about one thing;

    “If you’re not bringing math skills to the problem,” he said with a sort of amused asperity, “then representative democracy is a problem.”

    Yep, representative democracy is useless (and dangerous) when low information voters get anywhere near a voting booth, as this clearly shows;

     

    Thumb up 0

  2. Seattle Outcast

    Gates has always been a complete asshole.  After he married Melinda in order to thwart a massive sexual harassment that would have cost him many millions in both cash and negative publicity, she went on a program to rehabilitate his already horrid public image.  Clothes that fit, a haircut that didn’t look like he did it himself while drunk, an end to the $10K stripper outings at Seattle clubs, and generally keeping his mouth shut and handing Microsoft over to Balmer (another asshole) so the government lawsuits would cease.

    None of this actually changed the fact that Bill had always been an insufferable spoiled little prick that treated everyone around him like garbage.  Long term Seattle residents have all heard the stories, many of them dating well back into the 80’s – he may have gotten big into charity, but he’ll never be anyone that people want to associate with willingly.

    Thumb up 0

  3. CM

    ….discredited big government booga-boo of climate change.

    YAWN. Hopefully one day you and Rich and others will wake up and realise that this makes you guys the nutjobs. How do you expect to be taken seriously about anything when you’re still claiming the earth is flat?

    Thumb up 0

  4. CM

    Capitalism died a long time ago, right about the time government inserted itself in the middle of any business transaction between willing participants, through mechanisms that control entry and protect special interests while pretending to be done to serve the public.

    So when exactly was that then? You seem to be referring to ‘good old days’ that never actually existed. Through much (perhaps even most) of the last 100 years the government took money off you at a higher rate.

    Thumb up 0

  5. Nobody

    Hopefully one day you and Rich and others will wake up and realise that this makes you guys the nutjobs.

    Please.  Not toeing the liberal agenda line already makes us “nut jobs”, or “evil” even.  Not to mention below average in intelligence.  You liberals have been calling us names for years.  You just did so with your “flat earth” nonsense.

    Earth to CM:  Saying that the sky ain’t falling ain’t the same as calling the earth flat.  Not even close.

    Thumb up 0

  6. CM

    But you can keep pretending that cult who’s altar you worship on has a leg to stand on CM.

    To the contrary, I’m not relying entirely on grand conspiracy and assuming an entirely profession is corrupt to the core, simply because anything else would be potentially dangerous to my ideology. Your link is a laughable collection of straw men and ideological garbage which just further underlines that you just don’t care about the reality of the situation, you’re simply obsessed with the ideology around it.

    I can also discuss the subject rationally rather than going all quiet whenever I’m asked to support what I’ve claimed. Unlike you, who runs away every single time you start getting questions that you simply cannot answer. Yet again, your position is far more consistent with being a ‘cult’. Mine doesn’t even remotely fit (which is why you can never go beyond your initial empty claim).

    Please.  Not toeing the liberal agenda line already makes us “nut jobs”, or “evil” even. 

    Typical knee-jerk straw-man nonsense non-response. The climate doesn’t give two shits about ideological agendas.

    You liberals 

    There we go. Ideology-based blindness in all its glory. You could have just responded with those two words and it would have added as much value. You nutjob.

    You just did so with your “flat earth” nonsense.

    Plenty of non-liberals accept climate science as legit. E.g. Hal here.

    Earth to CM:  Saying that the sky ain’t falling ain’t the same as calling the earth flat.  Not even close.

    You don’t need to listen to anyone who says ‘the sky is falling’. Simply look at what the science says. That would be consistent with living on Earth. Sticking your fingers in the your ears when things get inconvenient is precisely like staunchly remaining adamant that the earth is flat despite all the expert evidence to the contrary.

     

    Thumb up 0

  7. Nobody

    Typical knee-jerk straw-man nonsense non-response. The climate doesn’t give two shits about ideological agendas.

    Talk about straw man nonsense.  Dangerous ideological agendas do exist, and it doesn’t matter if the environment gives two shits or not.

    There we go.

    Well, there you go.  Are you denying that you are a liberal?

    Plenty of non-liberals accept climate science as legit.

    Doesn’t prove it is correct.  Or that they are for accepting it.

    You don’t need to listen to anyone who says ‘the sky is falling’. Simply look at what the science says.

    The science is saying the earth is getting warmer.  That doesn’t mean the sky is falling.

    I’m ignoring the rest of your straw man frothing.

     

     

    Thumb up 0

  8. CM

    Dangerous ideological agendas do exist, and it doesn’t matter if the environment gives two shits or not.

    Of course they do. One is very clearly in evidence here. It involves dismissing/denying a vast body of scientific knowledge relating to one issue, which is patently ridiculous. It paints climate changes concerns as merely an ideological issue (merely “toeing the line”), rather than one arising from scientific knowledge and understanding. It’s woeful.

    Are you denying that you are a liberal?

    How is that relevant to what the vast body of scientific knowledge tells us about climate change? 

    Doesn’t prove it is correct.  Or that they are for accepting it.

    Sure but it does indicate that it’s not a “liberal” issue, which is the point. And proof is for mathematics, this is science.

    The science is saying the earth is getting warmer.

    It says much more than that.

    That doesn’t mean the sky is falling.

    I never claimed that it was. But then I guess it all depends on how you define it. Does making the planet increasingly less inhabitable in a reasonably short space of time equate to “the sky falling”? I’m sure you’ll do what you need to semantically justify what you’ve already decided on ideological grounds. Unfortunately that isn’t going to change reality.

    I’m ignoring the rest of your straw man frothing.

    Nothing you’ve ever written indicates that it’s inaccurate. “You liberals” sums it all up nicely. It really is all you need to say, it tells us everything we need to know.

    Thumb up 0

  9. Nobody

    Don’t you ever get tired of talking out your ass, CM?

    Sure but it does indicate that it’s not a “liberal” issue, which is the point

    I never said it was a “liberal” issue.  I talked about “toeing the liberal line”.  Not the same thing.

    It says much more than that.

    Depends on who you talk to.  I have read that the ocean temps will continue to rise for the next 500 years regardless of whether we cap our emissions today, which is itself an impossible task.  But the real issue is that those who scream the loudest are hypocrites who fly around in private jets.  As long as that remains the case, the science doesn’t matter and the liberal power grab agenda becomes the focus.

    Period.  Whether you like it or not.

    it tells us everything we need to know

    Eh, you know it all already, doesn’t matter what I or anyone else says.

     

    Thumb up 0