This is what “Social Justice” always ends up looking like

Everyone will be equally miserable and we will be celebrating failure. And that’s not by accident. Even if everyone was given the exact same opportunity I can guarantee you that the result would vary, and vary vastly, based on what each of us chose to do with that. Progtards simply don’t get, or don’t want to get that. To them the system is unjust unless we all cross the finish line at the same time, and with the same goodies. Otherwise someone got screwed over, and not because they did anything wrong, but because the system is inherently unjust. What a bunch of fucking idiotic gobbledygook, but that’s what they believe. So I can not say I am surprised to find out that “Social Justice” week at the University of Georgia would have a campaign decrying success as an injustice. Yes, you heard that right:

Success stories are EBIL!

Success stories are EBIL!

Shit like this is why I can never be a progressive. As has often been said: progressivism is a mental disorder based on capitalizing on jealousy and greed, by painting others that will not allow the progressives to punish them for their success, as the evil ones. This is the loser’s movement. Only they want to now punish those that do not want to let them rip them off even more, by denying them the opportunity for success. Things go wrong when people, and always the ones with the worst kind of psychosis, start deciding what is allowed and what is not. When they get to pick who wins and who loses. And thing really get bad, shit hitting the fan bad, when they start saying that success must be punished, because it leaves other behind. When everyone is mediocre, we are all going to be miserable: not happy. And anyone telling you that mediocrity is cool because it is “Social Justice” needs to have their head examined.

BTW, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and a whole bunch of other progressives that believed in precisely this sort of “Socials Justice” pushed by the U of G, were not available for comment. They all were too busy counting the souls of the over 100 million they murdered, and the dead included in the countless other billions they put through the misery of “Social Justice”, in their special “Progressive Social Justice Stadium” in hell to talk to me. These guys also disliked success for the masses a lot. BTW, the Obamacare website happens to be a great implementation of what the “Social Justice” these types want looks like.

Comments are closed.

  1. richtaylor365

    This sounds like one of those “We know you are a loser (not your fault BTW) so come to our gathering of other losers, mingle with the other unfortunates, and who knows, you might find out that compared to all the colossal losers, you are just an average loser, yea for you” meeting. Naturally there will be free eats, stuff that somebody else paid for.

    Thumb up 5

  2. antoniolorusso

    “Nobody must be a success!”

    “How are we going to succeed at nobody being a success if we can’t be successful?”

    “Errr … “

    Thumb up 0

  3. Seattle Outcast

    I keep seeing various “progressive” bloggers and columnists citing the evils of income inequality, and how it must be abolished, starting with confiscation of the “evil” “excess” income and handing it out to life’s losers (relative scale).

    How is it that none of these idiots (starting with CM, who has mentioned it several times in his crusade for 100%+ taxes on people with more money than him (mild sarcasm off)) that severe income inequality (extremely few “rich” with no middle class and most people in an economic death spiral) is the symptom/result of socialist/marxist economic activity, and not an indication to engage in it.

    YOU’RE LOOKING AT THE PROBLEM BACKWARDS, MORON

    Thumb up 4

  4. CM

    “starting with CM, who has mentioned it several times in his crusade for 100%+ taxes on people with more money than him (mild sarcasm off)”

    There’s no sarcasm there, that’s clearly what you honestly think, as evidenced by what you keep posting. Which bears no relationship whatsoever to anything I’ve posted. But apparently you can’t actually read.

    Thumb up 0

  5. Seattle Outcast

    There’s no sarcasm there, that’s clearly what you honestly think, as evidenced by what you keep posting. Which bears no relationship whatsoever to anything I’ve posted. But apparently you can’t actually read.

    You’ve already shown numerous times you don’t actually understand about 90% of what you post links to, that you lie constantly about what you have posted isn’t surprising, or do you claim you were just “misunderstood”?

    Thumb up 2

  6. Xetrov

    You’ve already shown numerous times you don’t actually understand about 90% of what you post links to, that you lie constantly about what you have posted isn’t surprising, or do you claim you were just “misunderstood”?

    The downvote is mine. CM may disagree with a lot of my beliefs, and disregard evidence I’ve posted about various topics. But he doesn’t lie.

    Thumb up 2

  7. HARLEY

    and i have to say this CM is not the 100% taxes man , stogy is… just to clarify..
    But CM just tends to ignore that there are other options that a all encompassing state bureaucracy that provides for everyone lil boobobos..

    Thumb up 2

  8. HARLEY

    I keep seeing various “progressive” bloggers and columnists citing the evils of income inequality, and how it must be abolished, starting with confiscation of the “evil” “excess” income and handing it out to life’s losers

    Hell i keep seeing politicians bark this mantra…….

    Thumb up 3

  9. Seattle Outcast

    Stogy can be too much, but CM has repeatedly harked on the whole 99% bit, and several times made the idiotic reference to “how much better the economy was when we had a 96% tax rate on the rich”, which led to several people slamming him on being an idiot. Which is confusing, because normally people in NZ are considered to be pretty cool, well educated, and certainly not obsessed with the politics of a nation on the other side of the planet that he constantly proves he doesn’t “get”.

    Also, CM’s constant denial of his words, what he implies, and general support of far-left “progressive” ideology is more annoying than anything Stogy ever dreamed of. That and the fact that he acts like Obama’s mini-me with annoying lectures and links to websites that generally consist of brain-dead propaganda, disinformation, and thoroughly debunked “facts” that only Rachel Maddow quotes in public.

    Thumb up 4

  10. CM

    LMAO, my god you spin some horseshit SO, you grumpy old fart. As I keep saying, you should feel free to back up any of your claims with actual evidence. Instead of making shit up and continuing to fail miserably at answering any of my genuinely posed questions about a sustainable economy.

    Far left ideology is as desperate, blind, and clueless as far right, or any other ideology.

    I do love how you claim to ‘know’ about what people in NZ are “normally” like though, directly before having a go at me for apparently pretending to know about the US. Brilliant. (I guess economics works differently there, like the water swirling down the plughole in the opposite direction).

    Thumb up 3

  11. CM

    “CM has repeatedly harked on the whole 99% bit, and several times made the idiotic reference to “how much better the economy was when we had a 96% tax rate on the rich”, ”

    Earlier this week I said I thought corporate tax should be about 20%. But I’m guessing you saw that as “Go live in Somalia then!”.
    Is it an eyesight issue?

    Thumb up 2