Comments are closed.

  1. Seattle Outcast

    They meant a partisan source that wasn’t themselves.

    Standard libtard reasoning is to deny/ignore facts and “discredit” the source of the information by telling lies and exagerations, and misleading opinions about the source. It doesn’t matter if if this guy has been humping underage girls in the butt for years. He could be murdering them and serving them up for BBQ the next day and that wouldn’t be important; what is important is that non-liberals broke the rules and told everyone about it before the LSM decided he needed to go.

    Ditto with AGW and any “grassroots” resistance to “progesssive” (Marxist) politics. It’s all funded by those evil Koch brothers, big oil/tobacco/energy/pharma/insurance/medical/whatever, tax dodgers, 1-percenters, and believed soley by mouth-breathing gun nuts, that dropped out of the 3rd grade, work at Walmart, and go to church 3 times a day, where Rush Limbaugh and Fox News brainwash them.

    Thumb up 3

  2. Hal_10000

    I saw that, salinger. It’s bizarre. We’ll see what falls out. If someone did pay these women to lie, it’s going to be very ugly.

    Thumb up 0

  3. AlexInCT *


    Without informing readers in the story or elsewhere, on Monday night The Washington Post deleted its explicit claim that the Dominican prostitute who recanted her allegation against Sen. Robert Menendez had appeared in a video posted to The Daily Caller.

    In a story by investigative reporter Carol Leonnig, the Post initially reported at 4:47 p.m. that “the women’s videotaped claims, with their faces obscured, were played on the conservative Web site The Daily Caller. The news site reported that ‘the two women said they met Menendez around Easter at Casa de Campo, an expensive 7,000-acre resort in the Dominican Republic.’”

    But by late Monday evening, the paragraph had been changed to read, “the videotaped claims of two women, made with their faces obscured, were posted on the conservative Web site the Daily Caller” — making it ambiguous whether the two women who appeared in TheDC’s video are the same ones Leonnig identified as retracting their allegations against Menendez.

    My bet is we will find out the WaPo KNOWINGLY went with the bullshit story, taking it down later when the damage was already done and nobody is paying any attention anymore, to protect Menendez, and that’s because he is part of Team Blue. Menendez did this. I have no doubt about it. That’s why they are so desperate to cover for him.

    Thumb up 0

  4. Hal_10000

    Alex, elsewhere in the article, they maintain that she was in the video. The FBI has also said they have found no evidence of the prostitution thing.

    The other corruption charges still stand.

    Thumb up 0