Matt Fracking Damon and the Anti-Science Left

And to think, all the Hollywood celebs joke that the facts have a liberal bias:

Matt Damon and John Krasinski ran into a big problem while making their film “Promised Land”; how they solved it tells us a lot about Hollywood.

Some time ago, the two actors decided to make a movie about fracking — a method of getting once-inaccessible oil and gas out of the ground that has become the bête noire of many environmentalists.

The two wrote a screenplay they said was about “American identity . . . and what defines us as a country.”

It was the usual Hollywood script. We all know the . . . drill: Damon’s character works for an “evil” oil company. He comes to small-town America and sells locals a dangerous bill of goods.

So far, so good. Damon was building a movie around environmentalist concerns about fracking. But then reality intervened:

But while “Promised Land” was in production, the story of Dimock [Pennsylvania] collapsed. The state investigated and its scientists found nothing wrong. So the 11 families insisted EPA scientists investigate. They did — and much to the dismay of the environmental movement found the water was not contaminated.

There was Wolf Eagle Environmental Engineers in Texas, a group that produced a frightening video of a flaming house water pipe and claimed a gas company had polluted the water. But a judge just found that the tape was an outright fraud — Wolf Eagle connected the house gas pipe to a hose and lit the water.

Other “pollution” cases collapsed in Wyoming and Colorado. Even Josh Fox, who with his Oscar-nominated documentary “Gasland” first raised concerns about flammable water, has had to admit he withheld evidence that fracking was not responsible.

These frauds and misrepresentations created huge problems for the Damon/Krasinski script about “what defines us as a country.”

Here in Pennsylvania, we’ve been jerked around quite a bit by these bozos. I’m willing to listen to concerns about fracking. We should pay attention to concerns about new technology, especially one as dramatic as fracking. It’s the basic precautionary principle.

But many of these concerns have turned out to be overblown or outright fraudulent. And the people who should be maddest about this are the environmentalists. It’s their movement, their concerns, their compassion which is being hijacked by anti-corporate hucksters. Now if a legitimate concern were found with fracking, no one would listen because they’ve been lied to so many times.

Well, I’m sure they’ll find someone else to demonize. Maybe GM crops?

I used to think that nothing rivaled the misinformation spewed by climate change skeptics and spinmeisters.

Then I started paying attention to how anti-GMO campaigners have distorted the science on genetically modified foods. You might be surprised at how successful they’ve been and who has helped them pull it off.

I’ve found that fears are stoked by prominent environmental groups, supposed food-safety watchdogs, and influential food columnists; that dodgy science is laundered by well-respected scholars and propaganda is treated credulously by legendary journalists; and that progressive media outlets, which often decry the scurrilous rhetoric that warps the climate debate, serve up a comparable agitprop when it comes to GMOs.

In short, I’ve learned that the emotionally charged, politicized discourse on GMOs is mired in the kind of fever swamps that have polluted climate science beyond recognition.

The latest and greatest is a claim that GM crops cause tumors in rats. Turns out this research was so bogus it got instantly torn apart on the science blogs. Read the details at the link. Read also that Grist, Mother Jones and other liberal publications — who are constantly excoriating global warming skeptics — continue to praise the researchers and their bogus anti-GMO science.

The vast middle of the country is pro-science. I see it every time we do public outreach — the genuine fascination, enthusiasm and wonder in each of the thousand eyes that looks through a telescope on a dark night or peers at one of Hubble’s new images. America loves science and technology. Even the evil fracking is greeted with amazement by many people.

But the hard fringes of either side of our political spectrum do not love science. Fundamentalists of any stripe hate science because science produce results that are inconvenient to their ideology. The Hard Left, which is just as fundamentalist as the hard Right, will accept scientific results — like global warming — if it can be used to support an agenda. But that support will vanish once science comes up with things they don’t like, such as fracking and genetically-modified crops.

And like it or not, these luddite attitudes influence the Democratic Party. You can read Ronald Bailey’s analysis of the 2012 DNC platform and how they have delivered on their 2008 promises. Some is good — oil production is booming, for example. But they’ve been dragging their heels on other issues. And, for all their bluster, federal R&D has fallen 8% under Obama. And if sequestration happens, the eagle will be coming for another chunk of our liver come January despite our never having been bulked up by the stimulus.

That’s the pro-science party?

As for Matt Damon, they are apparently rewriting their movie so that the fraudulent anti-fracking activists are moles for the industry. Okay. Good luck with that. I suspect this will simply be another “issue” movie that — like every issue movie for the last decade — no one watches.

Comments are closed.

  1. Seattle Outcast

    About 30 years ago a bunch of high-profile environmentalists came out and admitted that they lied, and lied all the fucking time, because truth wasn’t a motivator. In order to get legislation passed that they wanted they had to exaggerate just about everything they found, and then finally just settled on making shit up to suit their agendas.

    It worked pretty well with clean air and water, so they moved on to other “evils” in an attempt to gain ever greater control over those that didn’t want to live the way they had decided was best for everyone. The only problem was that everyone wanted clean air and water, and lots of people remembered their on-air confessions of lying. So, when “global warming”, “frankenfood” and “sustainability” came along, pushed by the same batch of lying envirotards, they didn’t gain the traction. Hell, fifteen, twenty years later and these same causes are pretty much treated as not even existing by most people.

    Pretty much only the far left gives automatic credence to the people that push these types of things. One of the biggest tells is when an issue is “too important” for confirming data to be gathered and analyzed – you must act NOW!

    Thumb up 5

  2. Hal_10000 *

    I don’t quite agree with that. The radical enviros do lie and exaggerate (see overpopulation) but some of the concerns are legtimate. We really did have dirty water. The Cayahoga really did catch fire. Lake Erie really was almost dead. Acid raid was really happening. The ozone hole was really there. That the overstated the case or exaggerated them to advance an agenda does not render them fictional.

    Thumb up 2

  3. Mississippi Yankee

    This Matt Damon?

    And will the movie be called “The Bourne Demagoguery”?

    Does anyone know why I am no longer notified of ‘follow-up comments’ even tho I still check the boxed? I still get new post notifications.

    I blame Alex… it only started since he returned!
    (CM paid me to say that)

    Thumb up 5

  4. Seattle Outcast

    That the overstated the case or exaggerated them to advance an agenda does not render them fictional.

    For clean air and water, no, those were real enough.

    Ozone hole? Most of that narrative is fiction or lacked adequate data to make the claims they did.

    Global warming/cooling – lies.

    GMO – lies.

    Fracking – lies.

    Vaccine/autism link – lies.

    Acid rain – mostly lies.

    Spotted Owl – lies.

    “Organic” agriculture – lies.

    Sustainability – lies, or at the very least, extremely misleading.

    Peak oil – lies.

    Still looking for where they didn’t just lie to us, “for our own good”….

    Thumb up 9