Racism can only come from honkeys

At least that is the message we are now getting, loud and clear, from incident after incident, where the victims are attacked for clearly racial reasons, just like this case in Philly, the city of brotherly love:

THREE JUVENILES accused of assaulting a cabdriver and his passenger in Center City Saturday night while shouting racial slurs will not be charged with a hate crime, the District Attorney’s Office said yesterday.

The teens, who are black, were not charged with hate crimes because there was no evidence that the assault had been motivated by the race of the victims, who are white, said Tasha Jamerson, D.A. spokeswoman. Just shouting racial epithets during the commission of a crime doesn’t rise to the level of ethnic intimidation, she said.

Can you imagine the reverse being dismissed as non racial? Some white teens beat up a black whatever, use racial language, and the people that straddled us with the bullshit racial double standards come out and tell us straight faced that it is not clear the attack was motivated by racial reasons? BTW, this is NOT the first of these kinds of attacks. A clear pattern is emerging, and the message is frightening to me: basically we are getting confirmation that our suspicions that all the crusade to deal with their ever prevailing notion of rampant racism against minorities, was not really about getting rid racism, but was a cover to propagate racism in one direction.

“They just didn’t have that in this case,” she said. “If they had somebody who, two blocks before, heard them say, ‘We’re going to beat somebody up because they’re white, brown or purple,’ it might be different.”

How likely are they to apply this same standard when the reverse occurs? Historically the same people now telling us there was no evidence of racism have constantly and consistently impugned anyone else, to the point that they made it obvious they had the ability to read minds or something, when the race baiting machine stood to gain. I guess there is no gain here admitting that this case, which doesn’t fit the narrative, actually is racism pure and simple.

Watch these teens get off with neary a slap. Don’t be surprised if they all take it to mean they have a free hand to do more of this either. That’s exactly the message these people want send.

Comments are closed.

  1. CM

    In this case the attack was on a black AND a white person. Not just a black person. There is a big difference between being able to make a case for a ‘hate crime’ and racist comments being made during the commission of a crime. My understanding is that they only go for ‘hate crimes’ when there is sufficient evidence to support that. Otherwise, it would be pointless to do so.

    However, there was no evidence that the race of the victims was a factor in the assault, according to the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.

    “I fully support the DA’s decision, 100 percent,” Goldman, a Daily Pennsylvanian columnist, said.

    http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2012/02/penn_student_attacked_during_cab_ride

    Racist!

    He wrote a column about it, and nowhere did he mention a racial aspect. Probably because it was seemingly just a random attack, not one motivated by race.

    http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2012/01/brian_goldman_flashback_to_a_flashmob

    Thumb up 0

  2. Seattle Outcast

    My understanding is that they only go for ‘hate crimes’ when there is sufficient evidence to support that.

    And you’d be wrong – the USA legal system has established considerable precedent for only charging white people with race-based “hate crimes” and frequently with only the fact that the victim was non-white white the alleged perpetrator was white. Had the races been reversed, absolutely any utterance of a racial slur would have been used as “proof” of a hate crime.

    Of course, the entire concept of a “hate crime” is incredibly flawed to begin with. The crime itself is to be punished, not the supposed motivations or prejudices of the offender. We have literally made “thought crimes” punishable by prison sentences and opened the door for more.

    Thumb up 5

  3. Xetrov

    In this case the attack was on a black AND a white person. Not just a black person. There is a big difference between being able to make a case for a ‘hate crime’ and racist comments being made during the commission of a crime.

    Gang Member pleads guilty to Hate Crime

    The guy (a white skinhead) attacked a white man who was with a black woman, and yelled racial slurs during the attack. He was charged, and pled guilty to a Hate Crime over it.

    BTW, the DA who chose not to press hate crime charges in the case posted by Alex just happens to be African-American.

    Thumb up 1

  4. CM

    Just love how people know ‘the truth’ after they read a single news report. They know better than the cops and DA who put together all the relevant information and make a decision on how to proceed. They even know better than one of the victims.
    Genius.

    Thumb up 0