Human nature will invariably draw us to any bit of info or media that reinforces any preconceived notions we have, about anything. It validates what we already know, or think we know, and makes us feel better about our analytical skills. In this vein, and admitting up front that it offers zero probative value, I present this:
The reason we exclude “Hearsay” assertions in courts of law is simple, they are unreliable, and in this video it is possible that what he is saying is 100% accurate, or it could be entirely made up. But is there anyone here who down deep was not nodding through out, saying to himself ,”Figures”? I’ll put it this way, it is consistent with other stuff I have read about how the various presidents have treated those tasked with protecting them. And whatever truth lies in the depictions, it speaks directly to the character and integrity of our leaders, who we hope are worthy of the job.