Driving Toward the Glass Ceiling

I’m happy that the GOP has held out on the debt ceiling and continues to hold out for more budgetary discipline. But there are rumblings right now that have me very worried. They have broken off talks with the Democrats and are balking at any revenue increases at all. And a substantial part of the base seems to think that hitting the debt ceiling is preferable to the deal that is currently on the table.

I find that baffling. The deal that is currently on the table is a very good one and one that Republicans have usually accepted. Estimates of the ratio of spending cuts to tax hikes range from 3-1 to 5-1. If it is the latter, that is pretty much identical to the deal the Republicans proposed back in March. Moreover, the tax hikes are what they should be, what luminaries like Alan Greenspan have been advocating for years — the elimination of tax expenditures rather than hikes in marginal rates.

There’s another aspect of this: the baseline. If the Republicans do nothing, a number of policies are already programmed into the law. The Bush tax cuts will expire — raising taxes approximately six times what the Democrats are asking. The AMT patch will expire and the SGR cuts to Medicare fees will kick in. In other words, walking away now will give the Democrats everything they want.

Frankly, I’m not sure what the Republicans are holding out for. Further cuts are going to require statutory changes to Medicare and Social Security law, something that can’t be thrown together in a few weeks. We’re at the lowest level of taxation since Harry and Bess Truman were in the White House. There is little evidence that canceling tax expenditures will hurt the economy. What gives?

(I’m also not sure what they’re thinking politically. If we hit the debt ceiling, one of two things happens. Either we stop paying debt interest, which causes a default and the various economic woes. Or we stop cutting checks for military personnel and Social Security recipients. Maybe the Republicans are expecting a crowd of pitchfork waving people to descend on Washington demanding that we don’t raise taxes on people making six figures or more. I just don’t see it happening. If the government stops issuing checks, the Democrats have a winning issue in 2012 — they’re not the ones walking away from a deal. You can then welcome back Speaker Pelosi and enjoy Obama’s second term.)

There are lot of people out there who will tell you that nothing bad will happen if we default. I find this difficult to believe, given the sheer scale of our debt. I find that difficult to believe, given the near unanimity among economists that this would be Very Bad Thing — bad for the bond market, bad for the dollar, bad for the stock market, bad for unemployment.

Even if we give the debt ceiling breakers a doubt, I still don’t see it. Let’s say that there is a chance — however remote — that a default does not trigger another even worse economic crisis. Do we want to take that chance? Do we want to pull the trigger on the revolver to find out if the chamber is empty? That’s about as anti-conservative a position as I can imagine: to risk the economy because of the unwillingness to sign a great deal in favor of an ideologically pure one.

But then again, I don’t recognize today’s GOP. Heedless risk in the service of ideology defines them. They are willing to, for example, gamble hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives on nation building. Pragmatic conservatism, risk reduction, bet hedging — this is something alien to today’s GOP. They are more interested in sticking to ideology than governing.

In the end, the wild card here is whether Obama decides to take the 14h Amendment solution, bypassing Congress on the debt ceiling. While Congress is constitutionally charged with debt, the ceiling is more of an historical artifact than anything else. It was implemented when the Treasury actually had to physically raise funds and therefore needed instruction on just how much to raise. In today’s electronic era, it mainly serves as a political bone.

But you know what? I think the dirty little secret of the GOP is that they want Obama to bypass them. It would obviate the need for difficult budget cuts and/or tax increases. It would let them blame Obama for something and enrage the base. It would give them fodder for ranting and raving and calling for impeachment and slagging Obama as Marxist communist Kenyan anti-colonial whatever. The only people who would be hurt are the few remaining taxpayers, investors, the employed, the unemployed, business people, etc. But the political class would be set.

What’s to lose? Only their ability to govern. But I have yet to be convinced that the GOP values the ability to govern. I’ve been surprisingly impressed by Boehner so far this year. Now is his real test: to see if he can cut a deal and save the GOP from themselves.

Update: An interesting post at powerline argues that low taxes cause higher spending by, essentially, allowing people to buy more government at a discount. I think he makes an excellent point. If taxes were high enough to pay for the government we have, there would be a lot more conservatives.

Comments are closed.

  1. Mississippi Yankee

    I want US to hit the debt ceiling so hard we all need a to wear a neck brace. I want it to be just like when an alcoholic/drug-addict hits rock bottom.

    The sooner we stop kicking this can down the road and ‘bottom out’ the sooner we can rebuild this financial clusterfuck.

    Thumb up 0

  2. Kimpost

    You’re not worried that this would have financial consequences? What’s wrong with a long term solution balancing the budget and attacking the deficit gradually over time? I mean, other than that you don’t trust politicians to do just that? After all, if you don’t trust them to do that, then why would you trust them to do right after hitting the ceiling?

    I would suggest addressing the problem now, in a responsible way. You could exempt social security and medicare/medicaid for now (lack of time), but appoint a group with a timetable for looking at those issues as well. I’m sure you could slash trillions over the next couple of decades. Obama wants to do that. Republicans want to do that (but more so), so getting a deal shouldn’t be too hard. If politics could be left on the sidelines that is…

    Thumb up 0

  3. Mississippi Yankee

    If politics could be left on the sidelines that is…

    Pretty big if Kimpost.

    I’d like to believe many, maybe most most, of our congress critters don’t start off as partisan crooks. I think it’s similar to a mob mentality though. Ideology breeds ideology coupled with power corrupts…. Term limits would correct a lot of that but that’s for another day.

    A Phoenix rising from the ashes of the crash that is coming is preferable, to me, than the lice ridden pigeon with the bandaged wing you suggest.
    And I do understand to will hit you Europeans harder than it will hit me and mine. But stretching it out is not going to save anyone in the end.

    And now today we have the (p)resident trying to play tough guy at Bill Clinton’s prodding. I see no good coming from this at all

    Thumb up 0

  4. hist_ed

    I’m sure you could slash trillions over the next couple of decades. Obama wants to do that.

    Wow, that was a good one. Haven’t laughed so hard at something posted here since our resident monkey poo flinger was banished (and dammit I can’t even remember his name.)

    Thumb up 0

  5. hist_ed

    You could exempt social security and medicare/medicaid for now (lack of time)

    And uhh, if you exepmt them them but manage some other cuts then many politicians will say “Look we fixed it re-elect me, see how brave I am” and the can will get kicked down the road again (and again and again).

    Thumb up 0

  6. Kimpost

    Just saying that finding a solution to a society’s structural problems, and mustering support for one in a couple of weeks, might be a little naive. Cut where you can agree to cut, and don’t raise taxes but end some tax exemptions and cut back on some subsidies. Just avoiding another Iraq and Afghanistan will save you guys a trillion or two depending on time span.

    I think you need and deserve a proper national debate on Social Security. One that takes years. Even socialist hell hole Sweden has addressed its retirement system. Here it pretty much happened without a big national debate, which in turn pissed some people off. Our major political parties agreed on long term reform, which resulted in a marked based solution, basically meaning that if times are tough, retirement will be tough, and if times are good, retirement will be good. The previously built-in unsustainabilities no longer exist.

    There’s also been some loose talk about raising the retirement age, but that has not yet happened. I would imagine it will eventually. Perhaps such an age should be revised every ten years or so based on a debate on elderly health numbers, or something.

    Thumb up 0

  7. hist_ed

    Sorry the laughter was about the line “Obama wants to do that”

    And I know that this:

    Just avoiding another Iraq and Afghanistan will save you guys a trillion or two depending on time span.

    is an article of faith among many and has been repeated over and over again, but war funding ain’t the biggest problem. One year of Obama’s stimulus was more expensive that 10 years of both wars.

    Regarding social security-I think citizens should be given a choice. Keep something like the current system (though with a higher retirement age, some means testing and some benefits trimmed) or private accounts in which most deductions are taken and invested according to the tax payers direction. Those taking private accounts would have a small portion of their deductions taxed out into the old system to keep paying for it (though there would have to be a big chunk of general fund money put in too to keep it afloat while all the boomers die off) based on how much they have laready put in-the older folks would have to put in less or none because they have already pissed a shitload of money into the system.

    Thumb up 0